-
Something wrong with this record ?
Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer
K. Pálsdóttir, S. Fridsten, L. Blomqvist, Z. Alagic, D. Fischerova, A. Gaurilcikas, K. Hasselrot, F. Jäderling, AC. Testa, A. Sundin, E. Epstein
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article
PubMed
33915001
DOI
10.1002/uog.23662
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cervix Uteri diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gynecology statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Clinical Competence statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Radiology statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Ultrasonography methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Vagina diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in women with cervical cancer, among experienced and less experienced observers, using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The TVS observers were all gynecologists and consultant ultrasound specialists, six with and seven without previous experience in cervical cancer imaging. The MRI observers were five radiologists experienced in pelvic MRI and four less experienced radiology residents without previous experience in MRI of the pelvis. The less experienced TVS observers and all MRI observers underwent a short basic training session in the assessment of cervical tumor extension, while the experienced TVS observers received only a written directive. All observers were assigned the same images from cervical cancer patients at all stages (n = 60) and performed offline evaluation to answer the following three questions: (1) Is there a visible primary tumor? (2) Does the tumor infiltrate > ⅓ of the cervical stroma? and (3) Is there parametrial invasion? Interobserver agreement within the four groups of observers was assessed using Fleiss kappa (κ) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Experienced and less experienced TVS observers, respectively, had moderate interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.46 (0.40-0.53) and 0.46 (0.41-0.52)), stromal invasion > ⅓ (κ (95% CI), 0.45 (0.38-0.51) and 0.53 (0.40-0.58)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.57 (0.51-0.64) and 0.44 (0.39-0.50)). Experienced MRI observers had good interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.70 (0.62-0.78)), while less experienced MRI observers had moderate agreement (κ (95% CI), 0.51 (0.41-0.62)), and both experienced and less experienced MRI observers, respectively, had good interobserver agreement regarding stromal invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.80 (0.72-0.88) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.69 (0.61-0.77) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)). CONCLUSIONS: We found interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in patients with cervical cancer to be moderate for TVS and moderate-to-good for MRI. The level of interobserver agreement was associated with experience among TVS observers only for parametrial invasion. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Diagnostic Radiology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Danderyd Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Radiology Capio S t Göran Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
Division of Pelvic Cancer Theme Cancer Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Obstetrics and Gynecology Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Lithuania
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003375
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127150310.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/uog.23662 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33915001
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Pálsdóttir, K $u Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden $u Division of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- 245 10
- $a Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer / $c K. Pálsdóttir, S. Fridsten, L. Blomqvist, Z. Alagic, D. Fischerova, A. Gaurilcikas, K. Hasselrot, F. Jäderling, AC. Testa, A. Sundin, E. Epstein
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To evaluate interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in women with cervical cancer, among experienced and less experienced observers, using transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The TVS observers were all gynecologists and consultant ultrasound specialists, six with and seven without previous experience in cervical cancer imaging. The MRI observers were five radiologists experienced in pelvic MRI and four less experienced radiology residents without previous experience in MRI of the pelvis. The less experienced TVS observers and all MRI observers underwent a short basic training session in the assessment of cervical tumor extension, while the experienced TVS observers received only a written directive. All observers were assigned the same images from cervical cancer patients at all stages (n = 60) and performed offline evaluation to answer the following three questions: (1) Is there a visible primary tumor? (2) Does the tumor infiltrate > ⅓ of the cervical stroma? and (3) Is there parametrial invasion? Interobserver agreement within the four groups of observers was assessed using Fleiss kappa (κ) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Experienced and less experienced TVS observers, respectively, had moderate interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.46 (0.40-0.53) and 0.46 (0.41-0.52)), stromal invasion > ⅓ (κ (95% CI), 0.45 (0.38-0.51) and 0.53 (0.40-0.58)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.57 (0.51-0.64) and 0.44 (0.39-0.50)). Experienced MRI observers had good interobserver agreement with respect to tumor detection (κ (95% CI), 0.70 (0.62-0.78)), while less experienced MRI observers had moderate agreement (κ (95% CI), 0.51 (0.41-0.62)), and both experienced and less experienced MRI observers, respectively, had good interobserver agreement regarding stromal invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.80 (0.72-0.88) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)) and parametrial invasion (κ (95% CI), 0.69 (0.61-0.77) and 0.71 (0.61-0.81)). CONCLUSIONS: We found interobserver agreement for the assessment of local tumor extension in patients with cervical cancer to be moderate for TVS and moderate-to-good for MRI. The level of interobserver agreement was associated with experience among TVS observers only for parametrial invasion. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a cervix uteri $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D002584
- 650 _2
- $a klinické kompetence $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D002983
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a gynekologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D006176
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
- 650 _2
- $a radiologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011871
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D014463
- 650 _2
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D002583
- 650 _2
- $a vagina $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D014621
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Fridsten, S $u Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Blomqvist, L $u Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Alagic, Z $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerova, D $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gaurilcikas, A $u Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 700 1_
- $a Hasselrot, K $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Jäderling, F $u Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden $u Department of Radiology, Capio S:t Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Testa, A C $u Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy $u Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Sundin, A $u Department of Surgical Sciences, Section for Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Epstein, E $u Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 58, č. 5 (2021), s. 773-779
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33915001 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127150306 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1750979 $s 1154524
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 58 $c 5 $d 773-779 $e - $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113