• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Correlation between ADR of screening and all colonoscopies

I. Mikoviny Kajzrlikova, P. Vitek, J. Chalupa, J. Kuchar, J. Platos, P. Reha, P. Klvana

. 2021 ; 165 (4) : 386-389. [pub] 20201216

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22007890

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy with polypectomy are associated with a reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as mortality, secondary to CRC. Because of the variation in physicians' performance and the risk of interval CRC after a colonoscopy, several quality indicators have been established. ADR (adenoma detection rate) is a generally accepted quality indicator. But it is also a target of possible gaming and achieving an adequate number of colonoscopies only from screening may be a problem for some practices. The aim of this study was to compare ADR for colonoscopies done for various indications and to look for correlations between the ADR of screening and all examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the quality indicators of all colonoscopies performed in a nonuniversity hospital, Frydek-Mistek, from January 2013 to December 2017. We calculated the ADR for all colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age (subdivided into screening, surveillance, diagnostic) and separately only for screening colonoscopies. Correlations were made using the Pearson's correlation coeficient. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 6925 patients over 50 years of age (3620 men, 3305 women, mean age 66.2 years). The ADRs for screening and surveillance were higher than for diagnostic colonoscopies for all of the endoscopists, and the ADRs for all colonoscopies were lower than for screening, but sufficiently over 25%. There was a positive correlation between the ADR of screening and all colonoscopies (r=0.906, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The calculation of ADR for all colonoscopies was possible in our endoscopic department, and there was a positive correlation with ADR for screening colonoscopies. ADR for all colonoscopies is a good tool for calculating real ADR from large sample sizes without gaming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03730441).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22007890
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220323102123.0
007      
ta
008      
220309s2021 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2020.059 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33325459
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Mikoviny Kajzrlíková, Ivana, $d 1982- $7 mzk2006377294 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Correlation between ADR of screening and all colonoscopies / $c I. Mikoviny Kajzrlikova, P. Vitek, J. Chalupa, J. Kuchar, J. Platos, P. Reha, P. Klvana
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy with polypectomy are associated with a reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as mortality, secondary to CRC. Because of the variation in physicians' performance and the risk of interval CRC after a colonoscopy, several quality indicators have been established. ADR (adenoma detection rate) is a generally accepted quality indicator. But it is also a target of possible gaming and achieving an adequate number of colonoscopies only from screening may be a problem for some practices. The aim of this study was to compare ADR for colonoscopies done for various indications and to look for correlations between the ADR of screening and all examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the quality indicators of all colonoscopies performed in a nonuniversity hospital, Frydek-Mistek, from January 2013 to December 2017. We calculated the ADR for all colonoscopies in patients over 50 years of age (subdivided into screening, surveillance, diagnostic) and separately only for screening colonoscopies. Correlations were made using the Pearson's correlation coeficient. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 6925 patients over 50 years of age (3620 men, 3305 women, mean age 66.2 years). The ADRs for screening and surveillance were higher than for diagnostic colonoscopies for all of the endoscopists, and the ADRs for all colonoscopies were lower than for screening, but sufficiently over 25%. There was a positive correlation between the ADR of screening and all colonoscopies (r=0.906, P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The calculation of ADR for all colonoscopies was possible in our endoscopic department, and there was a positive correlation with ADR for screening colonoscopies. ADR for all colonoscopies is a good tool for calculating real ADR from large sample sizes without gaming. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03730441).
650    12
$a adenom $x diagnóza $7 D000236
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kolonoskopie $7 D003113
650    12
$a kolorektální nádory $x diagnóza $7 D015179
650    _2
$a časná detekce nádoru $7 D055088
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a plošný screening $7 D008403
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vítek, Petr, $d 1974- $7 xx0190565 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Hospital Frydek-Mistek and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chalupa, Josef, $d 1956- $7 xx0238104 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kuchař, Jan $7 xx0252925 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Platoš, Jiří $7 xx0103373 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Řeha, Pavel $7 xx0192087 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Klvaňa, Pavel $7 xx0105873 $u Beskydy Gastrocentre, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 165, č. 4 (2021), s. 386-389
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33325459 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220309 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220323102118 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1773020 $s 1159083
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 165 $c 4 $d 386-389 $e 20201216 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20220309

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...