-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Study [Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie]
M. Demirel, AS. Kendirci, Y. Saglam, ON. Ergin, C. Sen, I. Öztürk
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kyčelní protézy * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhrada kyčelního kloubu * metody MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- vývojová dysplazie kyčelního kloubu * chirurgie MeSH
- vývojová kyčelní dysplazie * diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.
Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22026945
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230426103049.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 221108s2022 xr a f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2022/044
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36055667
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Demirel, M. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Study / $c M. Demirel, AS. Kendirci, Y. Saglam, ON. Ergin, C. Sen, I. Öztürk
- 246 31
- $a Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $7 D019644
- 650 12
- $a vývojová dysplazie kyčelního kloubu $x chirurgie $7 D000082602
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 12
- $a vývojová kyčelní dysplazie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D006618
- 650 12
- $a kyčelní protézy $7 D006622
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kendirci, A. S. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Saglam, Y. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Ergin, O. N. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Sen, C. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 700 1_
- $a Öztürk, I. $u Demiroglu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 89, č. 4 (2022), s. 272-278
- 856 41
- $u https://achot.cz/pdfs/ach/2022/04/05.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20221108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230426103044 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1892760 $s 1178252
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 89 $c 4 $d 272-278 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20221108