Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Study [Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie]

M. Demirel, AS. Kendirci, Y. Saglam, ON. Ergin, C. Sen, I. Öztürk

. 2022 ; 89 (4) : 272-278. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22026945

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.

Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22026945
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230426103049.0
007      
ta
008      
221108s2022 xr a f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2022/044
035    __
$a (PubMed)36055667
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Demirel, M. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
245    10
$a Comparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Study / $c M. Demirel, AS. Kendirci, Y. Saglam, ON. Ergin, C. Sen, I. Öztürk
246    31
$a Porovnání technik High Hip Center a anatomické rekonstrukce v léčbě VDK typu Crowe II a III: retrospektivní klinická studie
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $7 D019644
650    12
$a vývojová dysplazie kyčelního kloubu $x chirurgie $7 D000082602
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    12
$a vývojová kyčelní dysplazie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D006618
650    12
$a kyčelní protézy $7 D006622
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kendirci, A. S. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Saglam, Y. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Ergin, O. N. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Sen, C. $u Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Öztürk, I. $u Demiroglu Bilim University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 89, č. 4 (2022), s. 272-278
856    41
$u https://achot.cz/pdfs/ach/2022/04/05.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20221108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230426103044 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1892760 $s 1178252
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 89 $c 4 $d 272-278 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20221108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...