-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Should I stay or should I go? Three-year-olds' reactions to appropriate motives to interrupt a joint activity
F. Bonalumi, B. Siposova, W. Christensen, J. Michael
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
679092
European Research Council - International
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- morální závazky MeSH
- motivace * MeSH
- mravy * MeSH
- pud MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Understanding when it is acceptable to interrupt a joint activity is an important part of understanding what cooperation entails. Philosophical analyses have suggested that we should release our partner from a joint activity anytime the activity conflicts with fulfilling a moral obligation. To probe young children's understanding of this aspect, we investigated whether 3-year-old children (N = 60) are sensitive to the legitimacy of motives (selfish condition vs. moral condition) leading agents to intentionally interrupt their joint activity. We measured whether children protested or released their partner by scoring their reactions. Our results indicate that children did not manifest different reactions when the motive behind their partner leaving was moral than when the motive was selfish. However, our data showed a stable pattern: regardless of the partner's motives, some 3-year-olds take initiatives to release their partners from joint activity, suggesting that measuring release is a valuable tool for investigating joint action.
Department of Cognitive Science Central European University Vienna Austria
Department of Philosophy University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Philosophy University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom
Department of Psychology and Life Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Psychology University of Warwick Coventry United Kingdom
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016887
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105504.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0288401 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37440499
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bonalumi, Francesca $u Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/000000015598376X
- 245 10
- $a Should I stay or should I go? Three-year-olds' reactions to appropriate motives to interrupt a joint activity / $c F. Bonalumi, B. Siposova, W. Christensen, J. Michael
- 520 9_
- $a Understanding when it is acceptable to interrupt a joint activity is an important part of understanding what cooperation entails. Philosophical analyses have suggested that we should release our partner from a joint activity anytime the activity conflicts with fulfilling a moral obligation. To probe young children's understanding of this aspect, we investigated whether 3-year-old children (N = 60) are sensitive to the legitimacy of motives (selfish condition vs. moral condition) leading agents to intentionally interrupt their joint activity. We measured whether children protested or released their partner by scoring their reactions. Our results indicate that children did not manifest different reactions when the motive behind their partner leaving was moral than when the motive was selfish. However, our data showed a stable pattern: regardless of the partner's motives, some 3-year-olds take initiatives to release their partners from joint activity, suggesting that measuring release is a valuable tool for investigating joint action.
- 650 12
- $a motivace $7 D009042
- 650 12
- $a mravy $7 D009014
- 650 _2
- $a pud $7 D004328
- 650 _2
- $a morální závazky $7 D028681
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Siposova, Barbora $u Department of Psychology and Life Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Christensen, Wayne $u Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/000000017146285X
- 700 1_
- $a Michael, John $u Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/000000034516196X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 18, č. 7 (2023), s. e0288401
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37440499 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105458 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000424 $s 1203249
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 18 $c 7 $d e0288401 $e 20230713 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- GRA __
- $a 679092 $p European Research Council $2 International
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013