Unrestrained 5-20-ns explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations using the Cornell et al. force field have been carried out for d[GCG(N)11GCG]2 (N, purine base) considering guanine*cytosine (G*C), adenine*thymine (A*T), inosine*5-methyl-cytosine (I*mC), and 2-amino-adenine*thymine (D*T) basepairs. The simulations unambiguously show that the structure and elasticity of N-tracts is primarily determined by the presence of the amino group in the minor groove. Simulated A-, I-, and AI-tracts show almost identical structures, with high propeller twist and minor groove narrowing. G- and D-tracts have small propeller twisting and are partly shifted toward the A-form. The elastic properties also differ between the two groups. The sequence-dependent electrostatic component of base stacking seems to play a minor role. Our conclusions are entirely consistent with available experimental data. Nevertheless, the propeller twist and helical twist in the simulated A-tract appear to be underestimated compared to crystallographic studies. To obtain further insight into the possible force field deficiencies, additional multiple simulations have been made for d(A)10, systematically comparing four major force fields currently used in DNA simulations and utilizing B and A-DNA forms as the starting structure. This comparison shows that the conclusions of the present work are not influenced by the force field choice.

J Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry Czech Academy of Sciences and Center for Complex Molecular Systems and Biomolecules 182 23 Praha 8 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2001 Nov 16;314(1):23-40 PubMed

Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2000;51:435-71 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1999 Mar 12;274(11):6957-62 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 18;97(2):629-33 PubMed

Biopolymers. 2000-2001;56(4):232-56 PubMed

Nature. 1980 Oct 23;287(5784):755-8 PubMed

J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Apr 11;123(14):3295-307 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 2;29(39):9269-73 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(23):8385-9 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 5;221(3):761-4 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):1081-96 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 7;297(4):907-22 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3497-502 PubMed

Biopolymers. 1983 Mar;22(3):919-33 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1984 Jul 25;259(14):8974-9 PubMed

Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2313-36 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1999 Feb;16(4):845-62 PubMed

Nature. 1987 Nov 19-25;330(6145):221-6 PubMed

J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Aug 15;123(32):7745-55 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1987 Jun 16;26(12):3745-8 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 29;285(4):1623-32 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2035-9 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Feb;2(5):1021-32 PubMed

Chem Rev. 1999 Nov 10;99(11):3247-76 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 4;267(3):595-623 PubMed

Biophys J. 1998 Jul;75(1):134-49 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 20;231(4):1024-39 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Dec 15;28(24):4893-902 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2000 Aug 18;301(3):643-63 PubMed

Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1985 Mar;31(3):1695-1697 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(23):8257-61 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2000 Jun 9;299(3):695-709 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1999 Feb;16(4):787-810 PubMed

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000 Apr;10(2):182-96 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1980 Oct 15;143(1):49-72 PubMed

Biopolymers. 1992 Feb;32(2):145-59 PubMed

Biopolymers. 1997;44(1):45-63 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998 Oct;16(2):265-80 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1981 Aug;118(2):215-22 PubMed

Biochemistry. 2000 Oct 10;39(40):12121-7 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998 Dec;16(3):487-509 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Feb 11;18(3):613-8 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(24):7664-8 PubMed

Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):375-8 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1998 Jun 26;279(5):1123-36 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):9087-91 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1989 Apr 4;28(7):2763-7 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1997 Oct 31;273(3):668-80 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 Oct 1;26(19):4309-14 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1995 Mar 17;247(1):34-48 PubMed

Biophys J. 2001 Jan;80(1):455-68 PubMed

Anticancer Drug Des. 1999 Jun;14(3):291-303 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1998 Aug 28;281(4):675-87 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1986 Jan 20;195(1-2):53-6 PubMed

Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):935-43 PubMed

Biophys J. 1997 Jul;73(1):76-87 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1993 Jul 20;232(2):530-54 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 15;95(19):11163-8 PubMed

Int J Biol Macromol. 1994 Feb;16(1):3-6 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2001 Mar 9;306(5):1081-98 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1993 Oct;11(2):277-92 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1989 Mar 7;28(5):1993-2000 PubMed

Nature. 1986 Apr 10-16;320(6062):501-6 PubMed

Biochemistry. 2001 Jan 30;40(4):968-76 PubMed

EMBO J. 1995 May 1;14(9):2121-31 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 25;11(12):4141-55 PubMed

Biopolymers. 1988 Apr;27(4):585-603 PubMed

Nature. 1987 Feb 26-Mar 4;325(6107):821-3 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1993 Nov 9;32(44):11776-84 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1816-20 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2001 Feb 2;305(5):1025-33 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1990 May 5;265(13):7093-6 PubMed

Biophys J. 2001 Jan;80(1):140-8 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1988 Aug;6(1):63-91 PubMed

J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Feb;6(4):655-67 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1995 Sep 1;251(5):648-64 PubMed

Nature. 1984 Apr 5-11;308(5959):509-13 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 11;22(24):5497-503 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 2000 Dec 15;304(5):803-20 PubMed

J Med Chem. 1994 May 27;37(11):1602-9 PubMed

Biophys J. 1999 Nov;77(5):2366-76 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1999 Feb 26;286(3):651-60 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1999 Jan 22;285(3):1039-52 PubMed

Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):378-80 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1992 Jun 5;225(3):729-38 PubMed

Temperature-dependent elasticity of DNA, RNA, and hybrid double helices

A measure of bending in nucleic acids structures applied to A-tract DNA

Molecular dynamics simulations of Guanine quadruplex loops: advances and force field limitations