Development of flow cytogenetics and physical genome mapping in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

. 2002 ; 10 (8) : 695-706.

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid12575797

Procedures for flow cytometric analysis and sorting of mitotic chromosomes (flow cytogenetics) have been developed for chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Suspensions of intact chromosomes were prepared from root tips treated to achieve a high degree of metaphase synchrony. The optimal protocol consisted of a treatment of roots with 2 mmol/L hydroxyurea for 18 h, a 4.5-h recovery in hydroxyurea-free medium, 2 h incubation with 10 micromol/L oryzalin, and ice-water treatment overnight. This procedure resulted in an average metaphase index of 47%. Synchronized root tips were fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 20 min, and chromosome suspensions prepared by mechanical homogenization of fixed root tips. More than 4 x 10(5) morphologically intact chromosomes could be isolated from 15 root tips. Flow cytometric analysis of DAPI-stained chromosomes resulted in histograms of relative fluorescence intensity (flow karyotypes) containing eight peaks, representing individual chromosomes and/or groups of chromosomes with a similar relative DNA content. Five peaks could be assigned to individual chromosomes (A, B, C, G, H). The parity of sorted chromosome fractions was high, and chromosomes B and H could be sorted with 100% purity. PCR on flow-sorted chromosome fractions with primers for sequence-tagged microsatellite site (STMS) markers permitted assignment of the genetic linkage group LG8 to the smallest chickpea chromosome H. This study extends the number of legume species for which flow cytogenetics is available, and demonstrates the potential of flow cytogenetics for genome mapping in chickpea.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Planta. 1992 Aug;188(1):93-8 PubMed

Methods Cell Sci. 2001;23(1-3):71-82 PubMed

Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Mar;242(5):551-8 PubMed

Chromosoma. 2000 Nov;109(7):482-9 PubMed

World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995 Jul;11(4):438-48 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1999;7(6):431-44 PubMed

Methods Cell Biol. 2001;64:3-31 PubMed

Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1269-77 PubMed

Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Aug;262(1):90-101 PubMed

Cytometry. 2000 Oct 1;41(2):102-8 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Feb;85(6-7):665-72 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Mar;87(8):893-9 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1996 May;92(6):744-51 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(1):63-71 PubMed

Biotechniques. 1998 Jul;25(1):32-4, 36, 38 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1993 Jul;1(2):107-15 PubMed

Cell. 1988 Apr 8;53(1):127-36 PubMed

Mol Cells. 1999 Aug 31;9(4):436-9 PubMed

Genome. 1996 Apr;39(2):258-65 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1996 Nov;4(7):531-9 PubMed

Genome. 1999 Apr;42(2):210-7 PubMed

Genome. 1997 Oct;40(5):633-8 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):713-6 PubMed

Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):2033-41 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):656-63 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1998 Feb;6(2):97-104 PubMed

Methods Cell Sci. 1999;21(2-3):95-107 PubMed

Science. 2000 Jun 2;288(5471):1602-3 PubMed

Genome. 1996 Aug;39(4):697-703 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1998 Mar;96(3-4):348-53 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace