Integration of genetic and physical maps of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome using flow-sorted chromosomes

. 2011 Aug ; 19 (6) : 729-39. [epub] 20110927

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid21947955

Cultivated chickpea is the third most important legume after field bean and garden pea worldwide. Despite considerable breeding towards improved yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, the production of chickpea remained stagnant, but molecular tools are expected to increase the impact of current improvement programs. As a first step towards this goal, various genetic linkage maps have been established and markers linked to resistance genes been identified. However, until now, only one linkage group (LG) has been assigned to a specific chromosome. In the present work, mitotic chromosomes were sorted using flow cytometry and used as template for PCR with primers designed for genomic regions flanking microsatellites. These primers amplify sequence-tagged microsatellite site markers. This approach confirmed the assignment of LG8 to the smallest chromosome H. For the first time, LG5 was linked to the largest chromosome A, LG4 to a medium-sized chromosome E, while LG3 was anchored to the second largest chromosome B. Chromosomes C and D could not be flow-sorted separately and were jointly associated to LG6 and LG7. By the same token, chromosomes F and G were anchored to LG1 and LG2. To establish a set of preferably diagnostic cytogenetic markers, the genomic distribution of various probes was verified using FISH. Moreover, a partial genomic bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was constructed and putative single/low-copy BAC clones were mapped cytogenetically. As a result, two clones were identified localizing specifically to chromosomes E and H, for which no cytogenetic markers were yet available.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1998 Feb;6(2):97-104 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(1):63-71 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2003 May;106(8):1447-56 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010 Jul;129(1-3):211-23 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1993 Jul;1(2):107-15 PubMed

BMC Genomics. 2008 Jun 19;9:294 PubMed

Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):101-4 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):713-6 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):550-5 PubMed

Plant J. 2004 Sep;39(6):960-8 PubMed

Genome. 2007 Jan;50(1):26-34 PubMed

Plant J. 2006 Sep;47(6):977-86 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2005 Apr;137(4):1189-96 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Jun;104(8):1362-1372 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 26;101(43):15289-94 PubMed

Cytometry. 1997 Jul 1;28(3):236-42 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):496-505 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(8):695-706 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 May 27;274(933):227-74 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Mar;87(8):893-9 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010 Jul;129(1-3):190-8 PubMed

Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1269-77 PubMed

Plant Biotechnol J. 2011 Sep;9(7):768-75 PubMed

Mol Gen Genet. 1999 Aug;262(1):90-101 PubMed

Genome. 2003 Oct;46(5):893-905 PubMed

Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Mar;39(5):1037-50 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2011 Apr;23(4):1249-63 PubMed

Genome. 1996 Apr;39(2):258-65 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2004;12(1):77-91 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2007;15(1):51-66 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2011 May;122(8):1577-89 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2011 May;23(5):1706-18 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Aug;113(4):651-9 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2009;17(7):899-915 PubMed

Genetics. 2005 Jun;170(2):823-9 PubMed

Genome. 2010 Dec;53(12):1090-102 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2010 May;120(7):1415-41 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...