Interference of Salmonella enteritidis and Lactobacillus spp. with IL-8 levels and transepithelial electrical resistance of enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17007422
DOI
10.1007/bf02931810
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Caco-2 buňky metabolismus mikrobiologie MeSH
- elektrická impedance MeSH
- interleukin-8 metabolismus MeSH
- Lactobacillus fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Salmonella enteritidis patogenita MeSH
- salmonelóza imunologie MeSH
- slizniční imunita MeSH
- střevní sliznice metabolismus mikrobiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- interleukin-8 MeSH
Caco-2 cells (exhibiting characteristics of mature villus enterocytes) were used to determine bacteria (Salmonella enteritidis causing human gastroenteritis)-intestinal cell interactions. The interference of bacteria with the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of filter-grown Caco-2 cells and the production of IL-8 after exposure of the cells to S. enteritidis 857 and/or Lactobacillus strains (L. gasseri LF221 and L. rhamnosus BGT10) was evaluated. The strain 857 decreased TEER of filter-grown Caco-2 cells; in contrast, lactobacilli had a little or no effect. The effect of S. enteritidis on the TEER decreased if Caco-2 cells were pre-incubated with lactobacilli. This strain induced high levels of IL-8 (which can lead to cell damage). Compared to the IL-8 synthesis after exposure of Caco-2 cells to S. enteritidis 857, simultaneous exposure of Caco-2 cells to S. enteritidis and lactobacilli inhibited the IL-8 synthesis after short recovery periods.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Front Biosci. 1997 Jan 01;2:d12-26 PubMed
Pflugers Arch. 1996 Jun;432(2):225-33 PubMed
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Jun;61(2):136-69 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998 May;49(5):606-12 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1989 Dec;3(12):1833-41 PubMed
J Immunol. 1998 Jan 1;160(1):455-66 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 May 26;41(2):85-101 PubMed
Clin Exp Immunol. 2005 Jul;141(1):62-71 PubMed
J Infect Dis. 1990 Nov;162(5):1096-106 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;69(10):5802-11 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1995 Mar;177(6):1610-3 PubMed
Int J Immunopharmacol. 1995 Feb;17(2):103-8 PubMed
Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Aug;105(1):21-7 PubMed
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2003 Summer;8(2):194-203 PubMed
Microbiol Immunol. 2002;46(4):293-7 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):12283-8 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;23(8):1371-6 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Dec 1;112(3):266-74 PubMed
Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 3:III54-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):203-7 PubMed
Arch Microbiol. 2001 Jan;175(1):46-51 PubMed
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Jul;59(1):221-6 PubMed
Nature. 1993 Aug 12;364(6438):639-42 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Mar;66(3):1152-7 PubMed
Br J Nutr. 1998 Aug;80 Suppl 1:S147-71 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(6):519-23 PubMed
Innate immune response in the gut against Salmonella - review
Auto-aggregation and co-aggregation ability in bifidobacteria and clostridia
Analysis of the presence of prtR proteinase gene in natural isolates of Lactobacillus rhamnosus