Arterial HTN in children with T1DM--frequent and not easy to diagnose
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
19500279
DOI
10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00514.x
PII: PDI514
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- albuminurie epidemiologie MeSH
- ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku MeSH
- cirkadiánní rytmus MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu komplikace MeSH
- diabetické angiopatie diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- diastola MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin analýza MeSH
- hypertenze komplikace diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- kreatinin moč MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- systola MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost MeSH
- tělesná výška MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- glykovaný hemoglobin MeSH
- kreatinin MeSH
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the office blood pressure (OBP) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in the assessment of hypertension (HTN) in children with diabetes mellitus type 1 (T1DM). METHODS: We analyzed OBP and ABPM measurements in 84 diabetic children (43 boys) obtained at a median age of 14.9 yr and 6.3 +/- 3.5 yr after diagnosis of T1DM. OBP and ABPM results were converted into standard deviation scores (SDS). In addition, we analyzed blood pressure loads and nighttime dipping. The comparison between OBP and ABPM was performed using kappa coefficient and receiver operator curve (ROC). RESULTS: HTN was diagnosed in 43/84 (51%) patients using OBP (>95th percentile), and in 24/84 (29%) patients using ABPM ( > or = 95th percentile during 24 h, day or night). Both methods were in agreement in 33 ABPM normotensive and 16 ABPM hypertensive patients (most had nighttime HTN); 32% patients had white-coat HTN and 9.5% patients had masked HTN. The kappa coefficient was 0.175 (95% CI from -0.034 to 0.384) suggesting poor agreement between OBP and ABPM. Diastolic OBP was a better predictor of ABPM HTN (ROC area under the curve (AUC) = 0.71 +/- 0.06) than systolic OBP (AUC = 0.58 +/- 0.07). The percentage of non-dippers ranged from 7 to 23% in ABPM normotensive patients, and 21-42% in ABPM hypertensive patients who also had significantly higher BP loads (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Children with T1DM often suffer from nocturnal, white coat- and masked HTN, which can not be assessed and predicted by the OBP.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Masked Hypertension in Healthy Children and Adolescents: Who Should Be Screened?
Early Vascular Aging in Children With Type 1 Diabetes and Ambulatory Normotension
Should mean arterial pressure be included in the definition of ambulatory hypertension in children?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pediatric renal transplantation