Flow sorting of C-genome chromosomes from wild relatives of wheat Aegilops markgrafii, Ae. triuncialis and Ae. cylindrica, and their molecular organization
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26043745
PubMed Central
PMC4512188
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcv073
PII: mcv073
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Ae. cylindrica, Ae. triuncialis, Aegilops markgrafii, COS, FISH, GISH, Poaceae, Triticum aestivum, conserved orthologous set markers, flow cytometric chromosome sorting, fluorescence in situ hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, goatgrass, physical mapping, wheat,
- MeSH
- chromozomy rostlin genetika MeSH
- genom rostlinný * MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- indoly MeSH
- karyotyp MeSH
- karyotypizace MeSH
- konzervovaná sekvence genetika MeSH
- lipnicovité genetika MeSH
- metafáze MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie metody MeSH
- pšenice genetika MeSH
- sekvenční homologie nukleových kyselin MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DAPI MeSH Prohlížeč
- indoly MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aegilops markgrafii (CC) and its natural hybrids Ae. triuncialis (U(t)U(t)C(t)C(t)) and Ae. cylindrica (D(c)D(c)C(c)C(c)) represent a rich reservoir of useful genes for improvement of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum), but the limited information available on their genome structure and the shortage of molecular (cyto-) genetic tools hamper the utilization of the extant genetic diversity. This study provides the complete karyotypes in the three species obtained after fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with repetitive DNA probes, and evaluates the potential of flow cytometric chromosome sorting. METHODS: The flow karyotypes obtained after the analysis of 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained chromosomes were characterized and the chromosome content of the peaks on the flow karyotypes was determined by FISH. Twenty-nine conserved orthologous set (COS) markers covering all seven wheat homoeologous chromosome groups were used for PCR with DNA amplified from flow-sorted chromosomes and genomic DNA. KEY RESULTS: FISH with repetitive DNA probes revealed that chromosomes 4C, 5C, 7C(t), T6U(t)S.6U(t)L-5C(t)L, 1C(c) and 5D(c) could be sorted with purities ranging from 66 to 91 %, while the remaining chromosomes could be sorted in groups of 2-5. This identified a partial wheat-C-genome homology for group 4 and 5 chromosomes. In addition, 1C chromosomes were homologous with group 1 of wheat; a small segment from group 2 indicated 1C-2C rearrangement. An extensively rearranged structure of chromosome 7C relative to wheat was also detected. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of purifying Aegilops chromosomes provides an attractive opportunity to investigate the structure and evolution of the Aegilops C genome and to develop molecular tools to facilitate the identification of alien chromatin and support alien introgression breeding in bread wheat.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Badaeva ED, Friebe B, Gill BS. 1996a. Genome differentiation in PubMed
Badaeva ED, Friebe B, Gill BS. 1996b PubMed
Badaeva ED, Amosova AV, Muravenko OV, et al. 2002
Badaeva ED, Amosova AV, Samatadze TE, et al. 2004
Bai D, Scoles GJ, Knott DR. 1995 PubMed
Bedbrook J, Jones J, O’Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB. 1980 PubMed
Bennetzen JL. 2007 PubMed
Brenchley R, Spannag M, Pfeifer M, et al. 2012. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 491: 705–710. PubMed PMC
Burt C, Nicholson P. 2011 PubMed
Chang KD, Fang SA, Chang FC, Chung MC. 2010 PubMed
Choulet F, Alberti A, Theil S, et al. 2014 PubMed
Colmer TD, Flowers TJ, Munns R. 2006 PubMed
Contento A, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T. 2005 PubMed
Cox TS. 1998
Cseh A, Soós V, Rakszegi M, Türkösi E, Balázs E, Molnár-Láng M. 2013
Doležel J, Binarová P, Lucretti S. 1989
Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. 2003 PubMed
Doležel J, Kubaláková M, Paux E, Bartoš J, Feuillet C. 2007 PubMed
Doležel J, Vrána J, Safář J, Bartoš J, Kubaláková M, Simková H. 2012 PubMed PMC
Dvořák J. 2009
Eichler EE, Sankoff D. 2003 PubMed
Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Sagi-Assif O, Feldman M. 2007 PubMed
Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Feldman M. 2008 PubMed
Feuillet C, Keller B. 2002 PubMed PMC
Feuillet C, Langridge P, Waugh R. 2008 PubMed
Friebe B, Schubert V, Blüthner WD, Hammer K. 1992 PubMed
Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS. 1996
Furuta Y. 1970
Galiba G, Quarrie SA, Sutka J, Morgounov A, Snape JW. 1995 PubMed
Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR. 1979 PubMed PMC
Giorgi D, Farina A, Grosso V, Gennaro A, Ceoloni C, Lucretti S. 2013 PubMed PMC
Grosso V, Farina A, Gennaro A, Giorgi D, Lucretti S. 2012 PubMed PMC
International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2014 PubMed
Jia J, Zhao S, Kong X, et al. 2013 PubMed
Kilian B, Mammen K, Millet E, et al. 2011
Koebner RMD, Martin PK, Orford SM, Miller TE. 1996
Kubaláková M, Macas J, Doležel J. 1997
Kubaláková M, Valárik M, Bartoš J, et al. 2003 PubMed
Kubaláková M, Kovářová P, Suchánková P, et al. 2005 PubMed PMC
Linc G, Friebe B, Kynast RG, et al. 1999 PubMed
Ling H-Q, Zhao S, Liu D, et al. 2013 PubMed
Luo M-C, Gu YQ, You FM, et al. 2013 PubMed PMC
Lysák MA, Číhalíková J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Künzel G, Doležel J. 1999 PubMed
Martin-Sanchez JA, Gomez-Colmenarejo M, Del Moral J, et al. 2003 PubMed
Mayer KFX, Martis M, Hedley PE, et al. 2011 PubMed PMC
Molnár I, Cifuentes M, Schneider A, Benavente E, Molnár-Láng M. 2011a PubMed PMC
Molnár I, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Cseh A, Molnár-Láng M, Doležel J. 2011b PubMed PMC
Molnár I, Šimková H, Leverington-Waite M, et al. 2013 PubMed PMC
Molnár I, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, et al. 2014 PubMed
Molnár-Láng M, Molnár I, Szakács É, Linc G, Bedő Z. 2014
Mukai Y, Nakahara Y, Yamamoto M. 1993 PubMed
Muramatsu M. 1973
Nagaki K, Tsujimoto H, Isono K, Sasakuma T. 1995 PubMed
Paux E, Sourdille P, Salse J, et al. 2008 PubMed
Qi L, Friebe B, Gill BS. 2006 PubMed
Quarrie SA, Gulli M, Calestani C, Steed A, Marmiroli N. 1994 PubMed
Quraishi UM, Abrouk M, Bolot S, et al. 2009 PubMed
Raskina O, Barber JC, Nevo E, Belyayev A. 2008 PubMed
Rayburn AL, Gill BS. 1986
Rawat N, Tiwari VK, Singh N, et al. 2009
Riar AK, Kaur S, Dhaliwal HS, Singh K, Chhuneja P. 2012 PubMed
Riley R, Chapman V. 1967
Romero MD, Montes MJ, Sin E, et al. 1998
Šafář J, Bartoš J, Janda J, et al. 2004 PubMed
Schneider A, Linc G, Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M. 2005 PubMed
Schneider A, Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M. 2008. Utilisation of
Schwarzacher T, Leitch AR, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS. 1989. In situ localization of parental genomes in a wild hybrid. Annals of Botany 64: 315–324.
Sears ER. 1956
Šimková H, Svensson JT, Condamine P, et al. 2008 PubMed PMC
Snape JW, Semikhodskii A, Fish L, et al. 1997
Sutka J, Snape JW. 1989
Tiwari VK, Wang SC, Sehgal S, et al. 2014 PubMed PMC
Váguújfalvi A, Galiba G, Cattivelli L, Dubcovsky J. 2003 PubMed PMC
Van Slageren MW. 1994
Vida Gy, Cséplő M, Gulyás G, Karsai I, et al. 2011
Vrána J, Kubaláková M, Šimková H, Číhalíková J, Lysák MA, Doležel J. 2000 PubMed PMC
Yu J, Wang J, Lin W, et al. 2005 PubMed PMC
Zhang H, Jia J, Gale MD, Devos KM. 1998
Flow Cytometric Analysis and Sorting of Plant Chromosomes
Chromosome analysis and sorting