A Randomized Phase IIb Study of Mavrilimumab and Golimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
28941039
PubMed Central
PMC5767745
DOI
10.1002/art.40323
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Methotrexate therapeutic use MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid drug therapy MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha antagonists & inhibitors MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antirheumatic Agents MeSH
- golimumab MeSH Browser
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized MeSH
- mavrilimumab MeSH Browser
- Methotrexate MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This 24-week, phase IIb, double-blind study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab (a monoclonal antibody to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor α) and golimumab (a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (referred to as DMARD-IR) and/or inadequate response to other anti-TNF agents (referred to as anti-TNF-IR). METHODS: Patients with active RA and a history of DMARD-IR (≥1 failed regimen) or DMARD-IR (≥1 failed regimen) and anti-TNF-IR (1-2 failed regimens) were randomized 1:1 to receive either mavrilimumab 100 mg subcutaneously every other week or golimumab 50 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks alternating with placebo every 4 weeks, administered concomitantly with methotrexate. The primary end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20), 50% improvement, and 70% improvement response rates at week 24, percentage of patients achieving a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) of <2.6 at week 24, percentage of patients with a score improvement of >0.22 on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) at week 24, and safety/tolerability measures. This study was not powered to formally compare the 2 treatments. RESULTS: At week 24, differences in the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates between the mavrilimumab treatment group (n = 70) and golimumab treatment group (n = 68) were as follows: in all patients, -3.5% (90% confidence interval [90% CI] -16.8, 9.8), -8.6% (90% CI -22.0, 4.8), and -9.8% (90% CI -21.1, 1.4), respectively; in the anti-TNF-IR group, 11.1% (90% CI -7.8, 29.9), -8.7% (90% CI -28.1, 10.7), and -0.7% (90% CI -18.0, 16.7), respectively. Differences in the percentage of patients achieving a DAS28-CRP of <2.6 at week 24 between the mavrilimumab and golimumab groups were -11.6% (90% CI -23.2, 0.0) in all patients, and -4.0% (90% CI -20.9, 12.9) in the anti-TNF-IR group. The percentage of patients achieving a >0.22 improvement in the HAQ DI score at week 24 was similar between the treatment groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 51.4% of mavrilimumab-treated patients and 42.6% of golimumab-treated patients. No deaths were reported, and no specific safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate the clinical efficacy of both treatments, mavrilimumab at a dosage of 100 mg every other week and golimumab at a dosage of 50 mg every 4 weeks, in patients with RA. Both regimens were well-tolerated in patients who had shown an inadequate response to DMARDs and/or other anti-TNF agents.
Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
Center for Rheumatology Albany New York
Glasgow Biomedical Research Centre Glasgow UK
Institute of Rheumatology Charles University Prague Czech Republic
MedImmune Gaithersburg Maryland
Universidad de Chile and Hospital San Juan de Dios Santiago Chile
See more in PubMed
Mulherin D, Fitzgerald O, Bresnihan B. Synovial tissue macrophage populations and articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:115–24. PubMed
McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2205–19. PubMed
Di Franco M, Gerardi MC, Lucchino B, Conti F. Mavrilimumab: an evidence based review of its potential in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Core Evid 2014;9:41–8. PubMed PMC
Reynolds G, Gibbon JR, Pratt AG, Wood MJ, Coady D, Raftery G, et al. Synovial CD4+ T‐cell‐derived GM‐CSF supports the differentiation of an inflammatory dendritic cell population in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:899–907. PubMed PMC
Fiehn C, Wermann M, Pezzutto A, Hufner M, Heilig B. Plasma GM‐CSF concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and spondyloarthropathy. Z Rheumatol 1992;51:121–6. PubMed
Bell AL, Magill MK, McKane WR, Kirk F, Irvine AE. Measurement of colony‐stimulating factors in synovial fluid: potential clinical value. Rheumatol Int 1995;14:177–82. PubMed
Greven DE, Cohen ES, Gerlag DM, Campbell J, Woods J, Davis N, et al. Preclinical characterisation of the GM‐CSF receptor as a therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1924–30. PubMed PMC
Minter RR, Cohen ES, Wang B, Liang M, Vainshtein I, Rees G, et al. Protein engineering and preclinical development of a GM‐CSF receptor antibody for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Pharmacol 2013;168:200–11. PubMed PMC
Burmester GR, Weinblatt ME, McInnes IB, Porter D, Barbarash O, Vatutin M, et al. Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1445–52. PubMed PMC
Burmester G, McInnes IB, Kremer JM, Miranda P, Korkosz M, Vencovsky J, et al. Efficacy and safety/tolerability of mavrilimumab, a human GM‐CSFRα monoclonal antibody in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66 Suppl 10:S1231.
Burmester GR, McInnes IB, Kremer J, Miranda P, Korkosz M, Vencovsky J, et al. A randomised phase 2b study of mavrilimumab, a novel GM‐CSF receptor α monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1020–30. PubMed
Rubbert‐Roth A, Finckh A. Treatment options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis failing initial TNF inhibitor therapy: a critical review. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11 Suppl 1:S1. PubMed PMC
Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty‐eight–joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:44–8. PubMed
Furst DE, Pangan AL, Harrold LR, Chang H, Reed G, Kremer JM, et al. Greater likelihood of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated earlier in the disease course: results from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:856–64. PubMed PMC
Emery P. Optimizing outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti‐TNF treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51 Suppl 5:22–30. PubMed
Lundquist LM, Cole SW, Sikes ML. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. World J Orthop 2014;5:504–11. PubMed PMC
Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Moreland LW, Weisman MH, Birbara CA, et al. Adalimumab, a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:35–45. PubMed
Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, Bulpitt KJ, Fleischmann RM, Fox RI, et al. A trial of etanercept, a recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. N Engl J Med 1999;340:253–9. PubMed
Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C, et al. American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:727–35. PubMed
Borie R, Danel C, Debray MP, Taille C, Dombret MC, Aubier M, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Eur Respir Rev 2011;20:98–107. PubMed PMC
Juvet SC, Hwang D, Waddell TK, Downey GP. Rare lung disease II: pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Can Respir J 2008;15:203–10. PubMed PMC
Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137–45. PubMed
Van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:34–40. PubMed
Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, Uffmann M, Pflugbeil S, Machold K, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7:R796–806. PubMed PMC
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, et al. A Simplified Disease Activity Index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:244–57. PubMed
Ge M, Durham LK, Meyer RD, Xie W, Thomas N. Covariate‐adjusted difference in proportions from clinical trials using logistic regression and weighted risk differences. Drug Information Journal 2011;45:481–93.
Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, Baker PR, Groh J, Redelmeier DA. Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective. J Rheumatol 1993;20:557–60. PubMed
Furst DE, Gaylis N, Bray V, Olech E, Yocum D, Ritter J, et al. Open‐label, pilot protocol of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switch to infliximab after an incomplete response to etanercept: the opposite study. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:893–9. PubMed PMC
Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle M, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Gaylis N, et al. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors: findings with up to five years of treatment in the multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 GO‐AFTER study. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:14. PubMed PMC
Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewe R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, et al. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (GO‐AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial. Lancet 2009;374:210–21. PubMed
Kay J, Fleischmann R, Keystone E, Hsia EC, Hsu B, Mack M, et al. Golimumab 3‐year safety update: an analysis of pooled data from the long‐term extensions of randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:538–46. PubMed PMC