Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study

. 2018 Feb ; 77 (2) : 234-240. [epub] 20171017

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid29042358

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity results from the phase III study of SB2, a biosimilar of reference infliximab (INF), were previously reported through 54 weeks. This transition period compared results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from INF to SB2 with those in patients who maintained treatment with INF or SB2. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate treatment were randomised (1:1) to receive SB2 or INF at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 46. At week 54, patients previously receiving INF were rerandomised (1:1) to switch to SB2 (INF/SB2 (n=94)) or to continue on INF (INF/INF (n=101)) up to week 70. Patients previously receiving SB2 continued on SB2 (SB2/SB2 (n=201)) up to week 70. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 78. RESULTS: Efficacy was sustained and comparable across treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses between weeks 54 and 78 ranged from 63.5% to 72.3% with INF/SB2, 66.3%%-69.4% with INF/INF and 65.6%-68.3% with SB2/SB2. Treatment-emergent adverse events during this time occurred in 36.2%, 35.6% and 40.3%, respectively, and infusion-related reactions in 3.2%, 2.0% and 3.5%. Among patients who were negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA) up to week 54, newly developed ADAs were reported in 14.6%, 14.9% and 14.1% of the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profiles remained comparable among the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups up to week 78, with no treatment-emergent issues or clinically relevant immunogenicity after switching from INF to SB2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01936181; EudraCT number: 2012-005733-37.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dörner T, Strand V, Cornes P, et al. . The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:974–82. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209166 PubMed DOI PMC

Nam JL, Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, et al. . Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:516–28. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204577 PubMed DOI

Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK, et al. . Variations in criteria regulating treatment with reimbursed biologic DMARDs across European countries. Are differences related to country’s wealth? Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:2010–21. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203819 PubMed DOI

Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK, et al. . Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:198–206. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202603 PubMed DOI

Singh SC, Bagnato KM. The economic implications of biosimilars. Am J Manag Care 2015. PubMed

European Medicines Agency. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing monoclonal antibodies – non-clinical and clinical issues. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/06/WC500128686.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2017).

US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2017).

Choe JY, Prodanovic N, Niebrzydowski J, et al. . A randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:58–64. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207764 PubMed DOI PMC

Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. . A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:51–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588 PubMed DOI PMC

Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. . A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1613–20. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090 PubMed DOI PMC

Kay J. Editorial: biosimilars: new or deja vu? Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68:1049–52. PubMed

Janssen Biologics B.V. Summary of product characteristics: Remicade; http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000240/WC500050888.pdf (accessed 28 Feb 2017).

Shin D, Kim Y, Kim YS, et al. . A randomized, phase I pharmacokinetic study comparing SB2 and Infliximab reference product (Remicade(®)) in healthy subjects. BioDrugs 2015;29:381–8. 10.1007/s40259-015-0150-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Hong J, Lee Y, Lee C, et al. . Physicochemical and biological characterization of SB2, a biosimilar of Remicade® (infliximab). MAbs 2017;9:365–83. 10.1080/19420862.2016.1264550 PubMed DOI PMC

European Medicines Agency. Summary of opinion (initial authorisation). Flixabi. Infliximab. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Summary_of_opinion_-_Initial_authorisation/human/004020/WC500203991.pdf (accessed 12 Apr 2017).

Samsung Bioepis. Samsung Bioepis' Biologics License Application for SB2 infliximabb: Newsroom; http://www.samsungbioepis.com/en/newsroom/detail/Samsung-Bioepis-Biologics-License-Application-for-SB2-Infliximab-Biosimilar-Accepted-by-FDA.html (accessed 12 Apr 2017).

Smolen JS, Choe JY, Prodanovic N, et al. . Comparing biosimilar SB2 with reference infliximab after 54 weeks of a double-blind trial: clinical, structural and safety results. Rheumatology 2017;56:1771-1779 10.1093/rheumatology/kex254 PubMed DOI PMC

Anderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J, et al. . Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: american college of rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:640–7. 10.1002/acr.21649 PubMed DOI PMC

Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. . Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2017;389:2304–16. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30068-5 PubMed DOI

Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG, et al. . A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1426–31. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210742 PubMed DOI

Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:355–63. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208786 PubMed DOI PMC

Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1986–91. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591 PubMed DOI PMC

Griffiths CEM, Thaçi D, Gerdes S, et al. . The EGALITY study: a confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs. the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2017;176:928–38. 10.1111/bjd.15152 PubMed DOI

Weissenfeld J, Stock S, Lüngen M, et al. . The nocebo effect: a reason for patients' non-adherence to generic substitution? Pharmazie 2010;65:451–6. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01936181

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...