Olfactory function in patients after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas-a short review
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
30276575
DOI
10.1007/s10143-018-1034-1
PII: 10.1007/s10143-018-1034-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Endoscopic surgery, Microscopic surgery, Olfaction, Pituitary adenoma, Skull base, Transsphenoidal approach,
- MeSH
- adenom chirurgie MeSH
- chirurgické laloky škodlivé účinky MeSH
- čich MeSH
- endoskopické operace přirozenými otvory škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- hypofýza chirurgie MeSH
- klínová kost chirurgie MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrochirurgie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- nádory hypofýzy chirurgie MeSH
- neuroendoskopie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- poruchy čichu etiologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Olfaction is an important sensory input that obviously affects many daily activities. However, olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia and anosmia) leads to a pronounced decrease in quality of life. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to olfactory changes after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of the effects of transsphenoidal pituitary surgery on olfaction and compare different surgical techniques. Based on selected studies, the endoscopic approach, in comparison with the microscopic approach, seems to be superior in terms of preservation of olfactory function, although the quality of data from these studies is generally poor. The best results were observed when the endoscopic approach was used without harvesting of the nasoseptal flap.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Am J Rhinol. 1999 Jan-Feb;13(1):45-8 PubMed
Chem Senses. 2003 Oct;28(8):691-4 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1882-6 PubMed
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 PubMed
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jan;142(1):95-7 PubMed
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Oct;29(4):E10 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2011 May;121(5):990-3 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2011 Aug;121(8):1611-3 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):125-7 PubMed
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jan;3(1):62-5 PubMed
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Mar;3(3):217-20 PubMed
Neurosurgery. 2013 Apr;72(4):540-6 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1602-6 PubMed
Acta Med Port. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):200-7 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2112-9 PubMed
Chem Senses. 2014 Mar;39(3):185-94 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124(11):2470-5 PubMed
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Jul;156(7):1393-401 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):517-9 PubMed
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e465 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):145-50 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):221-5 PubMed
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015 Oct;48(5):795-804 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):365-8 PubMed
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Dec;76(6):464-70 PubMed
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:162-9 PubMed
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151531 PubMed
Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):1970-1975 PubMed
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jun;28(4):959-962 PubMed
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017 Sep 1;31(5):334-337 PubMed
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 May 28;2(5):281-287 PubMed
J Neurosurg. 1987 Jan;66(1):140-2 PubMed
Is nasal airflow disrupted after endoscopic skull base surgery? A short review
Sinonasal quality of life in patients after an endoscopic endonasal surgery of a sellar tumour
