BACKGROUND: Capacitation involves physiological changes that spermatozoa must undergo in the female reproductive tract or in vitro to obtain the ability to bind, penetrate and fertilize the egg. Up to date, several methods have been developed to characterize this complex biological process. The goal of the presented study is to mutually compare several fluorescent techniques, check their ability to detect changes in molecular processes during the capacitation progress and determine their ability to predict the percentage of acrosome reacted (AR) sperm after the exposure to solubilized zona pellucida (ZP). The capacitation process was analyzed using four fluorescent techniques: 1. chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, 2. anti-acrosin antibody (ACR.2) assay, 3. anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody assay, 4. fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (FITC-phall) assay. All these methods were tested using fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: All selected methods are capable to detect the capacitation progress of boar sperm in vitro, but there are significant differences in their outcome when using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry experimental arrangements and subsequent statistical analysis (KW-ANOVA). Also, the ability to predict the absolute numbers of sperm which will undergo ZP-induced AR differ significantly (CTC and ACR.2 gave the best predictions). CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared four largely used methods used to characterize capacitation process, highlighted their differences and showed that all are able to detect capacitation progress, CTC and ACR.2 are furthermore able to accurately predict the percentage of AR sperm after ZP-induced AR.

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Laboratory of Reproductive Biology Institute of Biotechnology Czech Academy of Sciences BIOCEV Vestec Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Austin CR. Observation on penetration of sperm into the mammalian egg. Aust J Sci Res. 1951;4:581–596. PubMed

Austin CR. Capacitation of spermatozoa. Int J Fertil. 1967;12:25–31. PubMed

Chang MC. Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes. Nature. 1951;168:997–998. doi: 10.1038/168697b0. PubMed DOI

Reyes A, Goicoechea B, Rosado A. Calcium ion requirement for rabbit spermatozoal capacitation and enhancement of fertilizing ability by ionophore A23187 and cyclic adenosine 3′:5′-monophosphate. Fertil Steril. 1978;29(4):451–455. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)43224-3. PubMed DOI

Peknicova J, Moos J, Mollova M, Srsen V, Capkova J. Changes in immunochemical localisation of acrosomal and sperm proteins in boar spermatozoa during capacitation and induced acrosome reaction. Anim Reprod Sci. 1994;35:255–271. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(94)90041-8. DOI

Breitbart H, Cohen G, Rubinstein S. Role of actin cytoskeleton in mammalian sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction. Reproduction. 2005;129(3):263–268. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00269. PubMed DOI

Dvoráková K, Moore HD, Sebková N, Palecek J. Cytoskeleton localization in the sperm head prior to fertilization. Reproduction. 2005;130(1):61–69. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00549. PubMed DOI

Pĕknicová J, Kubátová A, Sulimenko V, Dráberová E, Viklický V, Hozák P, Dráber P. Differential subcellular distribution of tubulin epitopes in boar spermatozoa: recognition of class III beta-tubulin epitope in sperm tail. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(3):672–679. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod65.3.672. PubMed DOI

Duncan AE, Fraser LR. Cyclic AMP-dependent phosphorylation of epididymal mouse sperm proteins during capacitation in vitro: identification of an Mr 95 000 phosphotyrosine-containing protein. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;97:287–299. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0970287. PubMed DOI

Seshagiri PB, Mariappa D, Aladakatti RH. Tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in mammalian spermatozoa: molecular and functional aspects. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;63:313–325. PubMed

Cross NL. Role of cholesterol in sperm capacitation. Biol Reprod. 1998;59(1):7–11. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod59.1.7. PubMed DOI

Ward CR, Storey BT. Determination of the time course of capacitation in mouse spermatozoa using a chlortetracycline fluorescence assay. Dev Biol. 1984;104:287–296. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90084-8. PubMed DOI

Maxwell WM, Johnson LA. Chlortetracycline analysisof boar spermatozoa after incubation, flow cytometric sorting, cooling, or cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;46:408–418. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<408::AID-MRD21>3.0.CO;2-T. PubMed DOI

Ded L, Dostalova P, Dorosh A, Dvorakova-Hortova K, Peknicova J. Effect of estrogens on boar sperm capacitation in vitro. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-87. PubMed DOI PMC

Brener E, Rubinstein S, Cohen G, Shternall K, Rivlin J, Breitbart H. Remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton during mammalian sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(3):837–845. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.009233. PubMed DOI

Kalab P, Peknicová J, Geussová G, Moos J. Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in boar sperm through a cAMP-dependent pathway. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51(3):304–314. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199811)51:3<304::AID-MRD10>3.0.CO;2-2. PubMed DOI

Piehler E, Petrunkina AM, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Töpfer-Petersen E. Dynamic quantification of the tyrosine phosphorylation of the sperm surface proteins during capacitation. Cytometry A. 2006;69(10):1062–1070. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20338. PubMed DOI

Berger T, Turner KO, Meizel S, Hedrick JL. Zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction in boar sperm. Biol Reprod. 1989;40(3):525–530. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod40.3.525. PubMed DOI

Schmid S, Henning H, Oldenhof H, Wolkers WF, Petrunkina AM, Waberski D. The specific response to capacitating stimuli is a sensitive indicator of chilling injury in hypothermically stored boar spermatozoa. Andrology. 2013;1(3):376–386. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00045.x. PubMed DOI

Peknicová J, Moos J. Monoclonal antibodies against boar acrosomal antigens labelling undamaged acrosomes of spermatozoa in immunofluorescence test. Andrologia. 1990;22(5):427–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1990.tb02022.x. PubMed DOI

Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Fraser LR, Niwa K. Functional analysis using chlortetracycline fluorescence and in vitro fertilization of frozen-thawed ejaculated boar spermatozoa incubated in a protein-free chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104(2):305–313. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1040305. PubMed DOI

Fraser LR, Abeydeera LR, Niwa K. Ca(2+)-regulating mechanisms that modulate bull sperm capacitation and acrosomal exocytosis as determined by chlortetracycline analysis. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;40(2):233–241. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080400213. PubMed DOI

Martínez-Pastor F, Mata-Campuzano M, Alvarez-Rodríguez M, Alvarez M, Anel L, de Paz P. Probes and techniques for sperm evaluation by flow cytometry. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45(Suppl 2):67–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01622.x. PubMed DOI

Gil MC, García-Herreros M, Barón FJ, Aparicio IM, Santos AJ, García-Marín LJ. Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology. 2009;71(2):254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.007. PubMed DOI

Maxwell WM, Johnson LA. Chlortetracycline analysis of boar spermatozoa after incubation, flow cytometric sorting, cooling, or cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;46(3):408–418. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<408::AID-MRD21>3.0.CO;2-T. PubMed DOI

Harkema W, Harrison RA, Miller NG, Topper EK, Woelders H. Enhanced binding of zona pellucida proteins to the acrosomal region of the intact boar spermatozoa in response to fertilizing conditions: a flow cytometric study. Biol Reprod. 1998;58(2):421–430. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod58.2.421. PubMed DOI

Birck A, Labouriau R, Christensen P. Dynamics of the induced acrosome reaction in boar sperm evaluated by flow cytometry. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009;115(1–4):124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.10.017. PubMed DOI

Buckman C, George TC, Friend S, Sutovsky M, Miranda-Vizuete A, Ozanon C, Morrissey P, Sutovsky P. High throughput, parallel imaging and biomarker quantification of human spermatozoa by ImageStream flow cytometry. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2009;55(5–6):244–251. doi: 10.3109/19396360903056224. PubMed DOI

Kerns K, Zigo M, Drobnis EZ, Sutovsky M, Sutovsky P. Zinc ion flux during mammalian sperm capacitation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2061. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04523-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Yeste M, Fernández-Novell JM, Ramió-Lluch L, Estrada E, Rocha LG, Cebrián-Pérez JA, Muiño-Blanco T, Concha II, Ramírez A, Rodríguez-Gil JE. Intracellular calcium movements of boar spermatozoa during ‘in vitro’ capacitation and subsequent acrosome exocytosis follow a multiple-storage place, extracellular calcium-dependent model. Andrology. 2015;3(4):729–747. doi: 10.1111/andr.12054. PubMed DOI

Macías-García B, García-Marín LJ, Bragado MJ, González-Fernández L. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates protein tyrosine phosphorylation through PDK1 in boar spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019;86(7):751–761. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23160. PubMed DOI

Darszon A, Nishigaki T, Wood C, Treviño CL, Felix R, Beltrán C. Calcium channels and Ca2+ fluctuations in sperm physiology. Int Rev Cytol. 2005;243:79–172. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(05)43002-8. PubMed DOI

Darszon A, Treviño CL, Wood C, Galindo B, Rodríguez-Miranda E, Acevedo JJ, Hernandez-González EO, Beltrán C, Martínez-López P, Nishigaki T. Ion channels in sperm motility and capacitation. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;65:229–244. PubMed

Calvo L, Dennison-Lagos L, Banks SM, Fugger EF, Sherins RJ. Chemical composition and protein source in the capacitation medium significantly affect the ability of human spermatozoa to undergo follicular fluid induced acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(4):575–580. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138099. PubMed DOI