BACKGROUND: The presence and extent of ventricular dyssynchrony are currently assessed from the QRS complex morphology and width. However, similar electrocardiography (ECG) pattern may be caused by variable ventricular activation sequence. This may then contribute to interindividually different response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Electroanatomical mapping and magnetic resonance imaging scan were performed in 11 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB, QRS 170 ± 14 ms) and heart failure of ischemic (coronary artery disease (CAD), n = 2) and nonischemic (dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), n = 9) etiology. Ventricular activation sequence was studied during LBBB and final CRT programming. Presence and extent of scarring were analyzed in the 17-segment left-ventricular (LV) model. RESULTS: Regardless of etiology, presence of typical LBBB was associated with diffuse prolongation of impulse conduction with right-to-left activation sequence. Basal lateral wall was constant site of late activation. This activation pattern was present in "true LBBB," but also in LBBB-like pattern (persistent S wave in V5-6) and left axis deviation. Activation started in right vetricular (RV) apex in patients with left axis deviation at RV free wall in normal axis. Individuals with CAD and DCM patient displayed focal scar. Despite that they exhibited typical LBBB and activation sequence mirrored findings in other LBBB individuals. Reverse remodeling (∆LVESV > 15% after 6 months) was evident in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both typical LBBB and LBBB-like pattern might be associated with constant activation sequence regardless of etiology and scar localization. Activation initiation in RV apex, not LV activation sequence can be surrogate for left axis deviation. CRT caused inter- and intraventricular LV resynchronization without significantly changed RV activation sequence and duration.

Children's Heart Centre Motol University Hospital 1st and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Biomedical Technology Faculty of Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Cardiology Motol University Hospital and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Radiology Motol University Hospital and 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281-2329.

Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e235-e240.

Daubert JC, Saxon L, Adamson PB, et al. EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1524-1576.

Belkin MN, Upadhyay GA. Does cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit patients with non-left bundle branch block prolonged QRS patterns? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19:125.

Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(6):927-934.

Ploux S, Lumens J, Whinnett Z, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(24):2435-2443.

Dawoud F, Schuleri KH, Spragg DD, et al. Insights from novel noninvasive CT and ECG imaging modalities on electromechanical myocardial activation in canine model of ischemic dyssynchronous heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1454-1461.

Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CT). Circulation. 2011;123:1061-1072.

Cunnington C, Kwok CS, Satchithananda DK, et al. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is not associated with a reduction in mortality or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with non-left bundle branch block QRS morphology: metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2015;101(18):1456-1462.

Brenyo A, Rao M, Barsheshet A, et al. QRS axis and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure enrolled in MADIT-CRT. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:442-448.

Gervais R, Leclercq C, Shankar A, et al. Surface electrocardiogram to predict outcome in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a sub-analysis of the CARE-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:699-705.

Sciarra L, Golia P, Palama Z, et al. Patients with left bundle branch block and left axis deviation show specific left ventricular asynchrony pattern: implications for left ventricular lead placement during CRT implantation. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51:175-181.

Eschalier R, Ploux S, Lumens J, et al. Detailed analysis of ventricular activation sequences during right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch block and the potential implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:137-143.

van Bommel RJ, Ypenburg C, Mollema SA, et al. Site of latest activation in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy: patterns of dyssynchrony among different QRS configurations and impact of heart failure etiology. Am Heart J. 2011;161:1060-1066.

Dawoud F, Spragg DD, Berger RD, et al. Non-invasive electromechanical activation imaging as a tool to study left ventricular dyssynchronous patients: implication for CRT therapy. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49:375-382.

Verbeek XA, Vernooy K, Peschar M, Cornelussen RNM, Prinzen FW. Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:558-567.

Bonakdar HR, Jorat MV, Fazelifar AF, et al. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tools. Europace. 2009;11(10):1330-1337.

Rickard J, Popovic Z, Verhaert D, et al. The QRS narrowing index predicts reverse left ventricular remodelling following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:604-611.

Barsheshet A, Moss AJ, McNitt S, et al. Long-term implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing among patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:212-218.

Jackson T, Claridge S, Behar J, et al. Differential effect with septal and apical RV pacing on ventricular activation in patients with left bundle branch block assessed by non-invasive electrical imaging and in silico modelling.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;57:115-123.

Riedlbauchová L, Cihák R, Bytesník J, et al. Optimization of right ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8(6):609-614.

Ploux S, Lumens JWhinnett Z, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2435-2443.

Ploux S, Eschalier R, Whinnet ZI, et al. Electrical dyssynchrony induced by biventricular pacing: implications for patient selection and therapy improvement. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:782-791.