Monotonic Tension-Torsion Experiments and FE Modeling on Notched Specimens Produced by SLM Technology from SS316L
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
19-03282S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
SP2020/23
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/17_049/0008407
Structural Funds of European Union
TN01000024
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
PubMed
33374722
PubMed Central
PMC7793519
DOI
10.3390/ma14010033
PII: ma14010033
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- additive manufacturing, digital image correlation method, finite element method (FEM), hill yield criterion, isotropic hardening, multiaxial loading, plasticity, stainless steel 316L,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The aim of this work was to monitor the mechanical behavior of 316L stainless steel produced by 3D printing in the vertical direction. The material was tested in the "as printed" state. Digital Image Correlation measurements were used for 4 types of notched specimens. The behavior of these specimens under monotonic loading was investigated in two loading paths: tension and torsion. Based on the experimental data, two yield criteria were used in the finite element analyses. Von Mises criterion and Hill criterion were applied, together with the nonlinear isotropic hardening rule of Voce. Subsequently, the load-deformation responses of simulations and experiments were compared. Results of the Hill criterion show better correlation with experimental data. The numerical study shows that taking into account the difference in yield stress in the horizontal direction of printing plays a crucial role for modeling of notched geometries loaded in the vertical direction of printing. Ductility of 3D printed specimens in the "as printed" state is also compared with 3D printed machined specimens and specimens produced by conventional methods. "As printed" specimens have 2/3 lower ductility than specimens produced by a conventional production method. Machining of "as printed" specimens does not affect the yield stress, but a significant reduction of ductility was observed due to microcracks arising from the pores as a microscopic surface study showed.
See more in PubMed
Šebek F., Kubík P., Hůlka J., Petruška J. Strain hardening exponent role in phenomenological ductile fracture criteria. Eur. J. Mech. Solids. 2016;57:149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.12.006. DOI
Marya M., Singh V., Marya S., Hascoet J.Y. Microstructural development and technical challenges in laser additive manufacturing: Case study with a 316L industrial part. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2015;46:1654–1665. doi: 10.1007/s11663-015-0310-5. DOI
Kořínek M., Halama R., Fojtík F., Pagáč M., Krček J., Šebek F., Krzikalla D. Monotonic Testing of 3D Printed SS316L under Multiaxial Loading; Proceedings of the Experimental Stress Analysis 2020; Ostrava, Czech Republic. 19–22 October 2020; Ostrava, Czech Republic: VSB—Technical University of Ostrava; 2020. pp. 213–224.
Metelkova J., Kinds Y., Kempen K., de Formanoir C., Witvrouw A., Hooreweder B.V. On the influence of laser defocusing in selective laser melting of 316L. Addit. Manuf. 2018;23:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.006. DOI
Tapia G., Khairallah S., Matthews M., King W.E., Elwany A. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018;94:3591–3603. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z. DOI
Pham M.S., Dovgyy B., Hooper P.A. Twinning induced plasticity in austenitic stainless steel 316L made by additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;704:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.082. DOI
Chen X., Li J., Cheng X., He B., Wang H., Huang Z. Microstructure and mechanical properties of the austenitic stainless steel 316L fabricated by gas metal arc additive manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;703:567–577. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.024. DOI
Tan Z.E.E., Pang J.H.L., Kaminski J., Pepin H. Characterisation of porosity, density, and microstructure of directed energy deposited stainless steel AISI 316L. Addit. Manuf. 2019;25:286–296.
Leicht A., Klement U., Hryha E. Effect of build geometry on the microstructural development of 316L parts produced by additive manufacturing. Mater. Charact. 2018;143:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.040. DOI
Kaynak Y., Kitay O. The effect of post-processing operations on surface characteristics of 316L stainless steel produced by selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 2019;26:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.021. DOI
Wang D., Wu S., Yang Y., Dou W., Deng S., Wang Z., Li S. The Effect of a Scanning Strategy on the Residual Stress of 316L Steel Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Materials. 2018;11:1821. doi: 10.3390/ma11101821. PubMed DOI PMC
Wu A.S., Brown D.W., Kumar M., Gallegos G.F., King W.E. An Experimental Investigation into Additive Manufacturing-Induced Residual Stresses in 316L Stainless Steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2014;45:6260–6270. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2549-x. DOI
Bartlett J.L., Croom B.P., Burdick J., Henkel D., Li X. Revealing mechanisms of residual stress development in additive manufacturing via digital image correlation. Addit. Manuf. 2018;22:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.025. DOI
Hagara M., Lengvarský P., Bocko J., Pavelka P. The Use of Digital Image Correlation Method in Contact Mechanics. Am. J. Mech. Eng. 2016;4:445–449.
Paška Z., Halama R., Fojtík F., Gajdoš P. Strain response determination in notched specimens under multiaxial cyclic loading by DICM; Proceedings of the EAN 2017—55th Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis 2017; Novy Smokovec, Slovakia. 30 May–1 June 2017; Košice; Slovakia: TU–Košise; 2017. pp. 143–149.
Gibson I., Rosen D., Tucker B.S. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2014. Direct Digital Manufacturing; pp. 375–397. DOI
3D Hubs Introduction to Metal 3D Printing|3D Hubs. [(accessed on 16 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.3dhubs.com/knowledge-base/introduction-metal-3d-printing/
Hajnyš J., Pagáč M., Mesíček J., Petrů J., Krol M. Influence of scanning strategies parameters on residual stress in SLM process according to bridge curvature method for stainless steel AISI 316L. Materials. 2020;13:1659. doi: 10.3390/ma13071659. PubMed DOI PMC
Hajnyš J., Pagáč M., Kotera O., Petrů J., Scholz S. Influence of Basic Process Parameters on Mechanical and Internal Properties of 316L Steel in SLM Process for Renishaw AM400. MM Sci. J. 2019:2790–2794. doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2019_03_2018127. DOI
Data Sheets—Additive Manufacturing. [(accessed on 16 June 2020)]; Object Moved©. Available online: https://www.renishaw.com/en/data-sheets-additive-manufacturing--17862.
Renishaw . Magics Training: Material Profile Editing. Apply Innovation. Renishaw; New Mills, UK: 2016. [(accessed on 16 June 2020)]. Available online: https://www.renishaw.com.
Lecompte D., Smits A., Bossuyt S., Sol H., Vantomme J., Van Hemelrijck D., Habraken A.M. Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2006;44:1132–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2005.10.004. DOI
Hitzler L., Hirsch J., Heine B., Merkel M., Hall W., Öchsner A. On the anisotropic mechanical properties of selective laser-melted stainless steel. Materials. 2017;10:1136. doi: 10.3390/ma10101136. PubMed DOI PMC
Bian P., Shi J., Liu Y., Xie Y. Influence of laser power and scanning strategy on residual stress distribution in additively manufactured 316L steel. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020;132:106477. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106477. DOI
Zhang N., Li H., Zhang X., Hardacre D. Review of the fatigue performance of stainless steel 316L parts manufactured by selective laser melting. In: Chua C.K., Yeong W.Y., Tan M.J., Liu E., Tor S.B., editors. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing; Singapore. 16–19 May 2016; Singapore: Research Publishing; 2016.
Afkhami S., Dabiri M., Alavi S.H., Björk T., Salminen A. Fatigue characteristics of steels manufactured by selective laser melting. Int. J. Fatigue. 2019;122:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.029. DOI
Song X., Feih S., Zhai W., Sun C.N., Li F., Maiti R., Wei J., Yang Y., Oancea V., Brandt L.R., et al. Advances in additive manufacturing process simulation: Residual stresses and distortion predictions in complex metallic components. Mater. Des. 2020;193:108779. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108779. DOI
Ferro P., Berto F., Romanin L. Understanding powder bed fusion additive manufacturing phenomena via numerical simulation. Frattura Integrità Strutt. 2020;14:252–284. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.21. DOI
Colby R.B. Ph.D. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2013. Equivalent Plastic Strain for the Hill’s Yield Criterion under General Three-Dimensional Loading.
Altan T., Tekkaya A.E. Sheet Metal Forming: Fundamentals. 1st ed. ASM International; Materials Park, OH, USA: 2012. Plastic deformation—State of stress, yield criteria flow rule, and hardening rules; pp. 53–73.
Bertin M., Hild F., Roux S. On the identifiability of Hill-1948 plasticity model with a single biaxial test on very thin sheet. Strain. 2017;53:12233. doi: 10.1111/str.12233. DOI
Lichovník J., Mizera O., Sadílek M., Čepová L., Zelinka J., Čep R. Influence of Tumbling Bodies on Surface Roughness and Geometric Deviations by Additive SLS technology. Manuf. Technol. 2020;20:342–346. doi: 10.21062/mft.2020.050. DOI
Kubík P., Šebek F., Petruška J., Hůlka J., Park N., Huh H. Comparative investigation of ductile fracture with 316L austenitic stainless steel in small punch tests: Experiments and simulations. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2018;98:186–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.10.005. DOI
Effect of Oxide Systems on Purity of Tool Steels Fabricated by Electro Slag Remelting
Influence of Imposed Strain on Weldability of Dievar Alloy
Restoration and Possible Upgrade of a Historical Motorcycle Part Using Powder Bed Fusion
Study of Optimal Cam Design of Dual-Axle Spring-Loaded Camming Device
Special Issue: Selected Papers from Experimental Stress Analysis 2020