Interinstitutional analysis of the outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu pozorovací studie, multicentrická studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
36826589
PubMed Central
PMC10449993
DOI
10.1007/s00068-023-02248-2
PII: 10.1007/s00068-023-02248-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Aortic dissection, Type A aortic dissection, Volume,
- MeSH
- disekce aorty * chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
- nemocnice MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 1,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-2-azido-2-deoxyglucopyranose MeSH Prohlížeč
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of individual institutions on the outcome after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). METHODS: This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including 3902 patients who underwent surgery for TAAD at 18 university and non-university hospitals. RESULTS: Logistic regression showed that four hospitals had increased risk of in-hospital mortality, while two hospitals were associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were lower in four hospitals and higher in other four hospitals compared to the overall in-hospital mortality rate (17.7%). Participating hospitals were classified as overperforming or underperforming if their risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate was lower or higher than the in-hospital mortality rate of the overall series, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded 1729 pairs of patients operated at over- or underperforming hospitals. Overperforming hospitals had a significantly lower in-hospital mortality (12.8% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.0001) along with decreased rate of stroke and/or global brain ischemia (16.5% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.009) compared to underperforming hospitals. Aggregate data meta-regression of the results of participating hospitals showed that hospital volume was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (p = 0.043). Hospitals with an annual volume of less than 15 cases had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 1.345, 95% CI 1.126-1.607). CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that there are significant differences between hospitals in terms of early outcome after surgery for TAAD. Low hospital volume may be a determinant of poor outcome of TAAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831073.
Anesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit of Surgery University of Oulu Oulu Finland
Cardiac Surgery Molinette Hospital University of Turin Turin Italy
Cardiothoracic Department University Hospital Udine Italy
Cardiovascular Surgery Department University Hospital Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
Center for Global Health National Health Institute Rome Italy
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois Épagny Metz Tessy France
Department of Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint Denis Paris France
Department of Cardiac Surgery Glenfield Hospital Leicester UK
Department of Cardiac Surgery Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg Genk Belgium
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg Hamburg Germany
Department of Medicine South Karelia Central Hospital University of Helsinki Lappeenranta Finland
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery University of Franche Comte Besancon France
Division of Cardiac Surgery University of Verona Medical School Verona Italy
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany
Heart and Lung Center Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki 00029 Helsinki Finland
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool UK
LMU University Hospital Ludwig Maximilian University Munich Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Kaura A, et al. Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit. Eur Heart J. 2021;43:44–52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab586. PubMed DOI PMC
Larsen M, Trimarchi S, Patel HJ, et al. Extended versus limited arch replacement in acute Type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1104–1110. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx214. PubMed DOI
Mariscalco G, Maselli D, Zanobini M, et al. Aortic centres should represent the standard of care for acute aortic syndrome. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(1_suppl):3–14. doi: 10.1177/2047487318764963. PubMed DOI
Biancari F, Mariscalco G, Yusuff H, et al. European registry of type A aortic dissection (ERTAAD)—rationale, design and definition criteria. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01536-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Brescia AA, Patel HJ, Likosky DS, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in surgical and endovascular repair of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:1299–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.047. PubMed DOI PMC
Kazui T, Osada H, Fujita H. An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:483–492. doi: 10.1007/s11748-007-0172-0. PubMed DOI
Dobaria V, Kwon OJ, Hadaya J, et al. Impact of center volume on outcomes of surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissections. Surgery. 2020;168:185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.007. PubMed DOI
Kontopodis N, Galanakis N, Akoumianakis E, Ioannou CV, Tsetis D, Antoniou GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of institutional and surgeon procedure volume on outcomes after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62:388–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.015. PubMed DOI
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04831073