Routine use of automated FiO2 control in Poland: prospective registry and survey
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37719452
PubMed Central
PMC10502171
DOI
10.3389/fped.2023.1213310
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- adoption of technology, automated oxygen control, neonatal care, oxygen control, routine use,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The performance of automated control of inspired oxygen (A-FiO2) has been confirmed in dozens of studies but reports of routine use are limited. Broadly adopted in Poland, our aim is to share that experience. METHODS: We used a prospectively planned observational study of the performance, general use patterns, unit practices, and problems with A-FiO2, based on a web registry of case reports, complemented by surveys of subjective impressions. RESULTS: In 2019, a total of 92 A-FiO2 systems were in routine use in 38 centers. Of the 38 centers, 20 had agreed in 2013 to participate in the project. In these centers, A-FiO2 was applied in infants of all weights, but some centers restricted its use to weaning from oxygen and unstable infants. A cohort had reported their experience with each use (5/20 centers, 593 cases). A quarter of those infants were managed with a lower target range and three-quarters with alarms looser than European guidelines for manual SpO2 control. The perceived primary advantages of A-FiO2 were as follows: keeping the readings in the target range, reducing exposure to SpO2 extremes, reducing risk from nurse distraction, reducing workload, and reducing alarm fatigue. Practices did evolve with experience, including implementing changes in the alarm strategy, indications for use, and target range. The potential for over-reliance on automation was cited as a risk. There were a few reports of limited effectiveness (moderate 12/593 and poor 2/593). CONCLUSIONS: Automated oxygen control is broadly perceived by users as an improvement in controlling SpO2 with infrequent problems.
Clinical Department of Neonatology Independent Public Hospital Warsaw Poland
Department of Neonatology and Intensive Neonatal Care Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin Poland
Department of Neonatology Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education Warsaw Poland
Department of Neonatology Complex of Health Care Facilities Ostrow Wielkopolski Poland
Department of Neonatology Provincial Specialist Hospital Biala Podlaska Poland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hagadorn JI, Furey AM, Nghiem TH, Schmid CH, Phelps DL, Pillers DA, et al. Achieved versus intended pulse oximeter saturation in infants born less than 28 weeks’ gestation: the AVIOx study. Pediatrics. (2006) 118(4):270–6. 10.1542/peds.2005-0413 PubMed DOI
Nair V, Loganathan P, Lal MK, Bachman T. Automated oxygen delivery in neonatal intensive care. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:915312. 10.3389/fped.2022.915312 PubMed DOI PMC
Abdo M, Hanbal A, Asla MM, Ishqair A, Alfar M, Elnaiem W, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control in preterm infants receiving respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2022) 35(25):6069–76. 10.1080/14767058.2021.1904875 PubMed DOI
Maiwald CA, Niemarkt HJ, Poets CF, Urshitz M, Konig J, Humler H, et al. FiO2-C study group. Effects of closed-loop automatic control of the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FiO2-C) on outcome of extremely preterm infants—study protocol of a randomized controlled parallel group multicenter trial for safety and efficacy. BMC Pediatr. (2019) 19:363. 10.1186/s12887-019-1735-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Bachman TE, Marks NE, Rimensberger PC. Factors effecting adoption of new neonatal and pediatric respiratory technologies. Intensive Care Med. (2008) 34(1):174–8. 10.1007/s00134-007-0914-6 PubMed DOI
Swietliński J, Bober K, Gajewska E, Helwich E, Lauterbach R, Manowska M, et al. Polish Noninvasive respiratory support program study group. Introduction of infant flow nasal continuous airway pressure as the standard of practice in Poland: the initial 2-year experience. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2007) 8(2):109–14. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000257096.57260.3F PubMed DOI
Wilinska M, Bachman T, Swietlinski J, Gajewska E, Meller J, Helwich E, et al. Impact of the shift to neonatal noninvasive ventilation in Poland: a population study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2014) 15(2):155–61. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182a125f3 PubMed DOI
Wilińska M, Skrzypek M, Bachman T, Swietliński J, Kostuch M, Bierla K, et al. Using the automated FiO2-SpO2 control in neonatal intensive care units in Poland: a preliminary report. Dev Period Med. (2015) 3(216):263–70. . PubMed
Bachman T, Wilinska M, Piwowarczyk P, Skrzypek M. The adoption of automated FiO2 into Polish NICU: 2012-2019. Clin Tech. 2019, 49(4)19–24. 10.14311/CTJ.2019.4.03 DOI
Kaltsogianni O, DassiosT T, Belbal R, Greenough A. Survey of closed-loop automated oxygen control systems in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. (2022) 111:1002–3. 10.1111/apa.16239 PubMed DOI PMC
Van Zanten HA, Kuypers KLAM, Stenson BJ, Bachman TE, Pauws SC, Te Pas AB. The effect of implementing an automated oxygen control on oxygen saturation in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2017) 102(5):F395–9. 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312172 PubMed DOI
Salverda HH, Oldenburger NJ, Rijken M, Pauws SC, Dargaville PA, Te Pas AB. The effect of automated oxygen control on clinical outcomes in preterm infants: a pre- and post-implementation cohort study. Eur J Pediatr. (2021) 180(7):2107–13. 10.1007/s00431-021-03982-8 PubMed DOI PMC
Warakomska M, Bachman TE, Wilinska M. Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study. BMC Pediatr. (2019) 19(1):142. 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, Hallman M, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Ozek E, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update. Neonatology. (2023) 120(1):3–23. 10.1159/000528914 PubMed DOI PMC
Cummings JJ, Polin RA. Committee on fetus and newborn. Oxygen targeting in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. (2016) 138(2):e20161576. 10.1542/peds.2016-1576 PubMed DOI