Viability of Human Arterial Grafts Monitored by Comet Assay
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
38710053
PubMed Central
PMC11081180
DOI
10.33549/physiolres.935055
PII: 935055
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Arteries transplantation MeSH
- Comet Assay * MeSH
- Cryopreservation * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cadaver MeSH
- Graft Survival physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay. Keywords: Arterial grafts, Cryopreservation, Cadaveric, Multiorgan procurement, Viability, Comet assay.
See more in PubMed
Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Štádler P, Adamec M, Vlachovský R, Guňka I, Navrátil P, Thieme F, Špunda R, Burkert J, Staffa R, Němec P, Lindner J. Current vascular allograft procurement, cryopreservation and transplantation techniques in the Czech Republic. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28:529–534. doi: 10.17219/acem/90037. PubMed DOI
Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Štádler P, Adamec M, Vlachovský R, Guňka I, Navrátil P, Thieme F, Mitáš P, Špunda R, Špatenka J, Staffa R, Němec P, Lindner J. Organization model for allotransplantations of cryopreserved vascular grafts in Czech Republic. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018;19:437–445. doi: 10.1007/s10561-018-9691-4. PubMed DOI
Měřička P, Janoušek L, Benda A, Lainková R, Sabó J, Dalecká M, Prokšová P, Salmay M, Špunda R, Pecha O, Jandová M, Gregor J, Štěrba L, Špaček M, Lindner J. Cell viability assessment using fluorescence vital dyes and confocal microscopy in evaluating freezing and thawing protocols used in cryopreservation of allogeneic venous grafts. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10653. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910653. PubMed DOI PMC
Špunda R, Hrubý J, Měřička P, Mlček M, Pecha O, Splith K, Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Lindner J, Matia I, Spacek M. Immunosuppressive protocols with tacrolimus after cryopreserved aortal allotransplantation in rats. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201984. PubMed DOI PMC
Hrubý J, Špunda R, Měřička P, Mlček M, Pecha O, Splith K, Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Lindner J, Špaček M, Matia I. Influence of the new standardized clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol on immunogenicity of arterial allografts in rats. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0230234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230234. PubMed DOI PMC
Singh NP, McCoy MT, Ticce RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for the quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research. 1988;175:184–191. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0. PubMed DOI
Kumaravel T, Vilhar B, Faux S, Jha A. Comet Assay measurements: a perspective. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2009;25:53–56. doi: 10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9. PubMed DOI
Nandhakumar S, Parasuraman S, Shanmugam M, Ramachandra Rao K, et al. Evaluation of DNA damage using single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet Assay) J Pharmacol Pharmacotherapeut. 2011;2:107–111. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.81903. PubMed DOI PMC
Møller P, Azqueta A, Boutet-Robinet E, Koppen G, Bonassi S, Milič M, et al. Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:3817–3826. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0398-1. PubMed DOI PMC
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2019.
Rosseel Y, Lavaan An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48:1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. DOI
Muthén B. Multilevel covariance structure analysis. In: Hox J, Kreft I, editors. Multilevel Modeling, a special issue of Sociological Methods & Research. Vol. 22. 1994. pp. 376–398. DOI
Johnson LA, Ferris JA. Analysis of postmortem DNA degradation by single-cell gel electrophoresis. Forensic Sci International. 2002;126:43–47. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00027-0. PubMed DOI
Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26:249–261. doi: 10.1385/MB:26:3:249. PubMed DOI
Bankoglu EE, Schuele C, Stopper H. Cell survival after DNA damage in the comet assay. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95:3803–3813. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03164-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Špaček M, Měřička P, Janoušek L, Dalecká M, Benda A, Krs O, Slížová D, Špunda R, Hrubý J, Matia I, Honegrová B, Lindner J. Comparison of different thawing protocols in human cryopreserved venous grafts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;64:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.026. PubMed DOI