BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Understanding interspecific differences in plant growth rates and their internal and external drivers is key to predicting species responses to ongoing environmental changes. Annual growth rates vary among plants based on their ecological preferences, growth forms, ecophysiological adaptations and evolutionary history. However, the relative importance of these factors remains unclear, particularly in high-mountain ecosystems experiencing rapid changes. METHODS: We examined how habitat associations, elevational optima, growth forms, and ecophysiological and anatomical traits influence interspecific differences in radial growth rates among 324 vascular dicot species naturally occurring in the western Himalayas. Growth rates were determined from annual ring width measurements on the oldest plant sections of over 7800 individuals from a range of habitats (desert, steppe, wetland, alpine, subnival), growth forms (perennial tap-rooted, rhizomatous, cushiony, woody) and climatic gradients (elevations of 2650-6150 m). KEY RESULTS: Habitat associations accounted for 24 % of the variability in interspecific growth rates. Adding growth form and height increased the explanation to 42 %, and incorporating plant functional traits further improved predictions to 46 %. Growth rates were higher in warmer, drier conditions and lower in cold, wet environments. Subnival cushion plants had the slowest growth, while ruderal plants grew the fastest. Desert plants showed higher growth rates, reflecting their drought adaptive strategies, while wetland forbs had lower growth rates due to increased resource competition. Growth was positively correlated with leaf nitrogen content and non-structural carbohydrates (mainly fructans), due to enhanced photosynthesis and stress tolerance, and negatively correlated with leaf carbon and root nitrogen content. CONCLUSION: Our study of 324 dicot species in the western Himalayas suggests that plant growth in high elevations is determined by a combination of habitat conditions, morphological traits and ecophysiological adaptations. Growth variations among the highest-growing angiosperms reflect adaptive strategies along the global 'fast-slow' and 'acquisitive-conservative' spectrums. These results underscore the importance of habitat-specific studies for predicting plant growth responses to environmental changes, emphasizing a species-specific approach for effective conservation in fragile ecosystems.

Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway

Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Dukelská 135 379 01 Třeboň Czech Republic

Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Zámek 1 252 43 Průhonice Czech Republic

University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Kamýcká 129 165 21 Praha 6 Suchdol Czech Republic

University of South Bohemia Faculty of Science Branišovská 1645 31a 370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic

University of Tartu Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences J Liivi tn 2 50409 Tartu linn Tartu Estonia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, et al. 2014. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 740–745. PubMed PMC

Aerts R. 1996. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? The Journal of Ecology 84: 597.

Aerts R, Chapin FS.. 1999. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. In: Advances in ecological research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–67.

Blum A. 2005. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1159.

Bowman DMJS, Brienen RJW, Gloor E, Phillips OL, Prior LD.. 2013. Detecting trends in tree growth: not so simple. Trends in Plant Science 18: 11–17. PubMed

Buckley J, Widmer A, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM.. 2019. Variation in growth and defence traits among plant populations at different elevations: Implications for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Ecology 107: 2478–2492.

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS.. 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology: FPB 30: 239–264. PubMed

Chlumská Z, Janeček S, Doležal J.. 2014. How to preserve plant samples for carbohydrate analysis? Test of suitable methods applicable in remote areas. Folia Geobotanica 49: 1–15.

Chlumská Z, Liancourt P, Hartmann H, et al. 2022. Species- and compound-specific dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates toward the world’s upper distribution of vascular plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 201: 104985.

Chondol T, Klimeš A, Altman J, et al. 2023. Habitat preferences and functional traits drive longevity in Himalayan high‐mountain plants. Oikos 2023: e010073.

Colesie C, Stangl ZR, Hurry V.. 2020. Differences in growth-economics of fast vs. slow growing grass species in response to temperature and nitrogen limitation individually, and in combination. BMC Ecology 20: 63. PubMed PMC

de Bello F, Lavorel S, Hallett LM, et al. 2021. Functional trait effects on ecosystem stability: assembling the jigsaw puzzle. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 36: 822–836. PubMed

Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, et al. 2016. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529: 167–171. PubMed

Dietz H, Fattorini M.. 2002. Comparative analysis of growth rings in perennial forbs grown in an alpine restoration experiment. Annals of Botany 90: 663–668. PubMed PMC

Doležal J, Dvorsky M, Kopecky M, et al. 2016b. Vegetation dynamics at the upper elevational limit of vascular plants in Himalaya. Scientific Reports 6: 24881. PubMed PMC

Doležal J, Leheckova E, Sohar K, et al. 2016a. Annual and intra-annual growth dynamics of

Doležal J, Dvorský M, Börner A, Wild J, Schweingruber FH.. 2018. Anatomy, age and ecology of high mountain plants in Ladakh, the Western Himalaya. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Doležal J, Klimes A, Dvorsky M, Riha P, Klimesova J, Schweingruber F.. 2019. Disentangling evolutionary, environmental and morphological drivers of plant anatomical adaptations to drought and cold in Himalayan graminoids. Oikos 128: 1576–1587.

Doležal J, Jandova V, Macek M, et al. 2021. Climate warming drives Himalayan alpine plant growth and recruitment dynamics. Journal of Ecology 109: 179–190.

Doležal J, Chondol T, Chlumská Z, et al. 2024. Contrasting biomass allocations explain adaptations to cold and drought in the world’s highest-growing angiosperms. Annals of Botany 134: 401–414. PubMed PMC

Dvorský M, Doležal J, de Bello F, Klimešová J, Klimeš L.. 2011. Vegetation types of East Ladakh: species and growth form composition along main environmental gradients: vegetation of East Ladakh. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 132–147.

Dvorský M, Altman J, Kopecký M, et al. 2015. Vascular plants at extreme elevations in eastern Ladakh, northwest Himalayas. Plant Ecology & Diversity 8: 571–584.

Dvorský M, Chlumská Z, Altman J, et al. 2016. Gardening in the zone of death: an experimental assessment of the absolute elevation limit of vascular plants. Scientific Reports 6: 24440. PubMed PMC

Dvorský M, Macek M, Kopecký M, Wild J, Doležal J.. 2017. Niche asymmetry of vascular plants increases with elevation. Journal of Biogeography 44: 1418–1425.

Dvorský M, Klimes L, Dolezal J, Wild J, Dickoré WB.. 2018. A field guide to the flora of Ladakh. Prague: Academia, 291 pp.

Fagundes MV, Souza AF, Oliveira RS, Ganade G.. 2022. Functional traits above and below ground allow species with distinct ecological strategies to coexist in the largest seasonally dry tropical forest in the Americas. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 5: 930099.

Falster DS, Westoby M.. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 337–343.

Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT.. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40: 503–537.

Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125: 1–15. PubMed

Fernández‐Marín B, Gulías J, Figueroa CM, et al. 2020. How do vascular plants perform photosynthesis in extreme environments? An integrative ecophysiological and biochemical story. The Plant Journal 101: 979–1000. PubMed

Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M.. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. The American Naturalist 160: 712–726. PubMed

Freschet GT, Cornelissen JHC, van Logtestijn RSP, Aerts R.. 2010. Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora. Journal of Ecology 98: 362–373.

Gärtner H, Schweingruber FH.. 2013. Microscopic preparation techniques for plant stem analysis. Remagen-Oberwinter: Kessel.

Grime JP. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 250: 26–31.

Hartmann H, Trumbore S.. 2016. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees – from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytologist 211: 386–403. PubMed

Herben T, Klimešová J, Chytrý M.. 2018. Effects of disturbance frequency and severity on plant traits: An assessment across a temperate flora. Functional Ecology 32: 799–808.

Hiltbrunner E, Arnaiz J, Körner C.. 2021. Biomass allocation and seasonal non-structural carbohydrate dynamics do not explain the success of tall forbs in short alpine grassland. Oecologia 197: 1063–1077. PubMed PMC

Hilty J, Muller B, Pantin F, Leuzinger S.. 2021. Plant growth: the what, the how, and the why. The New Phytologist 232: 25–41. PubMed

Ho LST, Ané C.. 2014. A linear-time algorithm for gaussian and non-gaussian trait evolution models. Systematic Biology 63: 397–408. PubMed

Huisman J, Olff H, Fresco LFM.. 1993. A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 37–46.

Kang Y, Deng Z, Zang R, Long W.. 2017. DNA barcoding analysis and phylogenetic relationships of tree species in tropical cloud forests. Scientific Reports 7: 12564. PubMed PMC

Klimeš L, Doležal J.. 2010. An experimental assessment of the upper elevational limit of flowering plants in the western Himalayas. Ecography 33: 590–596.

Klimešová J, Doležal J, Dvorský M, de Bello F, Klimeš L.. 2011. Clonal growth forms in eastern Ladakh, Western Himalayas: classification and Habitat Preferences. Folia Geobotanica 46: 191–217.

Klimešová J, Martínková J, Pausas JG, et al. 2019. Handbook of standardized protocols for collecting plant modularity traits.

Körner C. 2021. Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Liancourt P, Doležal J.. 2023. Overgrowth competition or facilitation from cushion plants: implication for the role of plant–plant interactions. Ecology 104: e3989. PubMed

Liancourt P, Song X, Macek M, Santrucek J, Doležal J.. 2020. Plant’s‐eye view of temperature governs elevational distributions. Global Change Biology 26: 4094–4103. PubMed

Livingston DP, Hincha DK, Heyer AG.. 2009. Fructan and its relationship to abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS 66: 2007–2023. PubMed PMC

Luo M, Meng F, Sa C, et al. 2021. Response of vegetation phenology to soil moisture dynamics in the Mongolian Plateau. CATENA 206: 105505.

Macek P, Klimeš L, Adamec L, et al. 2012. Plant nutrient content does not simply increase with elevation under the extreme environmental conditions of Ladakh, NW Himalaya. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 44: 62–66.

Macek M, Dvorský M, Kopecký M, Wild J, Doležal J.. 2021. Elevational range size patterns of vascular plants in the Himalaya contradict Rapoport’s rule. Journal of Ecology 109: 4025–4037.

Morris H, Plavcová L, Cvecko P, et al. 2016. A global analysis of parenchyma tissue fractions in secondary xylem of seed plants. The New Phytologist 209: 1553–1565. PubMed PMC

Nobis MP, Schweingruber FH.. 2013. Adult age of vascular plant species along an elevational land‐use and climate gradient. Ecography 36: 1076–1085.

Noy-Meir I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 25–51.

Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877–884. PubMed

Palacio S, Hoch G, Sala A, Körner C, Millard P.. 2014. Does carbon storage limit tree growth? The New Phytologist 201: 1096–1100. PubMed

Poorter H, Garnier E.. 2007. Ecological significance of inherent variation in relative growth rate and its components In: Functional plant ecology. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 67–100.

Poorter H, Navas M.. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. The New Phytologist 157: 175–198. PubMed

Poorter H, Remkes C, Lambers H.. 1990. Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiology 94: 621–627. PubMed PMC

R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301.

Reich PB, Oleksyn J.. 2004. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 11001–11006. PubMed PMC

Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, et al. 2003. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S143–S164.

Rixen C, Wipf S, Rumpf SB, et al. 2022. Intraspecific trait variation in alpine plants relates to their elevational distribution. Journal of Ecology 110: 860–875.

Robinson D. 2001. δ PubMed

Roeder A, Schweingruber FH, Ebeling A, Eisenhauer N, Fischer M, Roscher C.. 2021. Plant diversity effects on plant longevity and their relationships to population stability in experimental grasslands. Journal of Ecology 109: 2566–2579.

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP.. 2003. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. PubMed

Rosell JA, Olson ME, Anfodillo T, Martínez‐Méndez N.. 2017. Exploring the bark thickness–stem diameter relationship: clues from lianas, successive cambia, monocots and gymnosperms. New Phytologist 215: 569–581. PubMed

Salguero-Gómez R, Jones OR, Jongejans E, et al. 2016. Fast–slow continuum and reproductive strategies structure plant life-history variation worldwide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 230–235. PubMed PMC

Sartori K, Vasseur F, Violle C, et al. 2019. Leaf economics and slow-fast adaptation across the geographic range of PubMed PMC

Scheurwater I, Cornelissen C, Dictus F, Welschen R, Lambers H.. 1998. Why do fast- and slow-growing grass species differ so little in their rate of root respiration, considering the large differences in rate of growth and ion uptake? Plant, Cell and Environment 21: 995–1005.

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW.. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 671–675. PubMed PMC

Schweingruber FH, Poschlod P.. 2005. Growth rings in herbs and shrubs: life span, age determination and stem anatomy. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 79: 195–415.

Schweingruber FH, Börner A, Schulze E-D.. 2011. Atlas of stem anatomy in herbs, shrubs and trees. Berlin: Springer.

Schweingruber FH, Dvorský M, Börner A, Doležal J.. 2020. Atlas of stem anatomy of arctic and alpine plants around the globe. Cham: Springer Nature.

Shipley B. 2006. Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta‐analysis. Functional Ecology 20: 565–574.

Signori‐Müller C, Oliveira RS, Valentim Tavares J, et al. 2022. Variation of non‐structural carbohydrates across the fast–slow continuum in Amazon Forest canopy trees. Functional Ecology 36: 341–355.

Valluru R, Van den Ende W.. 2008. Plant fructans in stress environments: emerging concepts and future prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 2905–2916. PubMed

Volaire F, Barkaoui K, Grémillet D, et al. 2023. Is a seasonally reduced growth potential a convergent strategy to survive drought and frost in plants? Annals of Botany 131: 245–254. PubMed PMC

von Arx G, Crivellaro A, Prendin AL, Čufar K, Carrer M.. 2016. Quantitative wood anatomy—practical guidelines. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 781. PubMed PMC

Wright IJ, Westoby M.. 2000. Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827. PubMed

Xiong J, Dong L, Lu J, et al. 2022. Variation in plant carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents across the drylands of China. Functional Ecology 36: 174–186.

Zong N, Song M, Zhao G, Shi P.. 2020. Nitrogen economy of alpine plants on the north Tibetan Plateau: nitrogen conservation by resorption rather than open sources through biological symbiotic fixation. Ecology and Evolution 10: 2051–2061. PubMed PMC

Climate warming promotes growth in Himalayan alpine cushion plants but threatens survival through increased extreme snowfall