Validation of the PANAMA Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer after Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

. 2025 May 01 ; 281 (5) : 852-860. [epub] 20250131

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid39886770
Odkazy

PubMed 39886770
PubMed Central PMC11974618
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006650
PII: 00000658-202505000-00019
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA) score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. BACKGROUND: The PANAMA score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: This retrospective international multicenter study is endorsed by the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. Patients with PDAC who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included. Mantel-Cox regression with interaction analysis was performed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 383 patients after resection of PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included of whom 187 (49%), 137 (36%), and 59 (15%) had a low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PANAMA-score, respectively. Discrimination in median overall survival (OS) was observed stratified by risk groups (48.5, 27.6, and 22.3 months, log-rank Plow-intermediate = 0.004, log-rank Pintermediate-high = 0.027). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with an OS difference in the low-risk group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.50, 95% CI: 0.92-2.50], whereas improved OS was observed in the intermediate (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.97) and high-risk groups (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94; P interaction = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The PANAMA 3-tier risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, available through pancreascalculator.com) correspond with differential survival in patients with resected PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The risk groups also differentiate between survival benefits associated with adjuvant treatment, with only the intermediate- and high-risk groups associated with improved OS.

Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Collegium Medicum University of Social Sciences Lodz Poland

Department of Diagnostics and Intervention Surgery Umeå University Umeå Sweden

Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery Liver Transplantation University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand Clermont Ferrand France

Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Croix Rousse University Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon University of Lyon Lyon France

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland

Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium

Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery The Pancreas Institute University of Verona Hospital Trust Verona Italy

Department of General Surgery Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello Palermo Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department P Giaccone University Hospital Palermo Italy

Department of General Surgery Division of Visceral Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of General Visceral and Thoracic Surgery University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Department of Hepato Biliary Pancreatic Surgery Liver Transplant Center Paul Brousse Hospital Université Paris Sud Université Paris Saclay Villejuif France

Department of Hepato Pancreato Biliary Surgery Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Department of Medical Oncology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Medical Oncology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation Pancreas Unit Ospedale di Circolo Insubria University Varese Italy

Department of Pancreatic Surgery IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Vita Salute University Milano Italy

Department of Surgery Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Surgery Charles University and Central Military Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Surgery Erasmus MC Cancer Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

Department of Surgery Odense Pancreas Center Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

Department of Surgery Oklahoma University Health Science Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma

Department of Surgery Pederzoli Hospital Peschiera Italy

Department of Surgery Trinity College Dublin Trinity Centre for Health Sciences Dublin Ireland

Department of Surgery University Hospital Birmingham Birmingham UK

Department of Surgery University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein UKSH Campus Luebeck Luebeck Germany

Department of Surgery University of California at San Francisco San Francisco

Department of Surgery University of Colorado Hospital Aurora

Department of Visceral Vascular and Endocrine Surgery Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg Halle Germany

Division of Surgery and Oncology Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit Royal Free Hospital London UK

National Surgical Centre for Pancreatic Cancer St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nassour I, Parrish A, Baptist L, et al. . National adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: paradigm shift in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. HPB. 2023;25:1323–1328. PubMed

Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, et al. . Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21:101–124. PubMed

Rompen IF, Habib JR, Sereni E, et al. . What is the optimal surgical approach for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic neck? - a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409:224. PubMed

Giannone F, Crippa S, Belfiori G, et al. . Redefining prognostic factors in potentially upfront resectable pancreatic head cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HPB. 2023;25:S447–S448.

Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. . Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015;261:12–17.67 PubMed PMC

Leonhardt CS, Hank T, Pils D, et al. . Prognostic impact of resection margin status on survival after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2024;110:453–463. PubMed PMC

Hank T, Sandini M, Ferrone CR, et al. . Association between pancreatic fistula and long-term survival in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:943–951. PubMed PMC

Hank T, Sandini M, Ferrone CR, et al. . A combination of biochemical and pathological parameters improves prediction of postresection survival after preoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer: the PANAMA-score. Ann Surg. 2022;275:391–397. PubMed

Leonhardt CS, Pils D, Qadan M, et al. . The revised R status is an independent predictor of postresection survival in pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Ann Surg. 2024;279:314–322. PubMed PMC

van Roessel S, van Veldhuisen E, Klompmaker S, et al. . Evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1733–1740. PubMed PMC

Hammad AY, Hodges JC, AlMasri S, et al. . Evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy survival outcomes among patients with surgically resected pancreatic carcinoma with node-negative disease after neoadjuvant therapy. JAMA Surg. 2023;158:55–62. PubMed PMC

Hank T, Hinz U, Reiner T, et al. . A pretreatment prognostic score to stratify survival in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2022;276:e914–e922. PubMed

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457. PubMed

Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, et al. . TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. Brit Med J. 2024;385:e078378. PubMed PMC

Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. . Ninety-day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2015;262:1071–1078. PubMed PMC

Chiorean EG, Chiaro MD, Tempero MA, et al. . Ampullary adenocarcinoma, version 1. 2023, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21:753–782. PubMed

Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. . The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–99. PubMed

Stoop TF, Sugawara T, Oba A, et al. . Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection of Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Following Preoperative FOLFIRINOX. JAMA Oncol. 2025. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5917. Online ahead of print. PubMed PMC

Leonhardt CS, Gustorff C, Klaiber U, et al. . Prognostic factors for early recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2024;167:977–992. PubMed

Rompen IF, Levine J, Habib JR, et al. . Progression of site-specific recurrence of pancreatic cancer and implications for treatment. Ann Surg. 2024;280:317–324. PubMed PMC

van Roessel S, Strijker M, Steyerberg EW, et al. . International validation and update of the Amsterdam model for prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:796–803. PubMed

Schorn S, Demir IE, Reyes CM, et al. . The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the histopathological features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;55:96–106. PubMed

Stoop TF, Oba A, Wu YHA, et al. . Pathological complete response in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemotherapy. JAMA Network Open. 2024;7:e2417625–e2417625. PubMed PMC

Bansal A, Heagerty PJ. A comparison of landmark methods and time-dependent ROC methods to evaluate the time-varying performance of prognostic markers for survival outcomes. Diagn Progn Res. 2019;3:14. PubMed PMC

Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Yu J, et al. . Circulating tumor cells dynamics in pancreatic adenocarcinoma correlate with disease status: results of the prospective CLUSTER study. Ann Surg. 2018;268:408–420. PubMed

Cecchini M, Salem RR, Robert M, et al. . Perioperative modified FOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10:1027–1035. PubMed PMC

Springfeld C, Ferrone CR, Katz MHG, et al. . Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:318–337. PubMed

Lambert A, Bouche O, Ayav A, et al. . LBA62 preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without chemoradiation (CRT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC): results from the randomized phase II trial PANDAS/PRODIGE 44. Ann Oncol. 2024;35:S1252.

Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. . FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–1825. PubMed

Kurahara H, Mataki Y, Idichi T, et al. . Effectiveness of adjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:6238–6245. PubMed

Liu H, Zenati MS, Rieser CJ, et al. . CA19-9 change during neoadjuvant therapy may guide the need for additional adjuvant therapy following resected pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:3950–3960. PubMed PMC

Maggino L, Malleo G, Crippa S, et al. . Pathological staging in postneoadjuvant pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: implications for adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg. 2023;110:973–982. PubMed

Drake JA, Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, et al. . The utilization and impact of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy and resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does more really matter? HPB (Oxford). 2020;22:1530–1541. PubMed

Zhang C, Wu R, Smith LM, et al. . An evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2022;224:51–57. PubMed

van de Wall BJM, Stadhouder A, Houwert RM, et al. . Natural experiments for orthopaedic trauma research: an introduction. Injury. 2023;54:429–434. PubMed

Nielson CM, Bylsma LC, Fryzek JP, et al. . Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and survival in patients with advanced stage solid tumor cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2021;26:e1609–e1618. PubMed PMC

Aung KL, Fischer SE, Denroche RE, et al. . Genomics-driven precision medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer: early results from the COMPASS trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1344–1354. PubMed PMC

Farshadi EA, Chang J, Sampadi B, et al. . Organoids derived from neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX patients recapitulate therapy resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6602–6612. PubMed PMC

Lee B, Lipton L, Cohen J, et al. . Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1472–1478. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...