Enhancing decision-making strategies in treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a novel analytical approach using PHASES, ELAPSS and UIATS scores for microsurgical clipping outcome prediction
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie
PubMed
40640641
PubMed Central
PMC12246004
DOI
10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y
PII: 10.1007/s10143-025-03683-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ELAPSS score, PHASES score, Predictive analysis, Surgical outcome, UIATS score, Unruptured intracranial aneurysms,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- intrakraniální aneurysma * chirurgie MeSH
- klinické rozhodování * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrochirurgie * metody MeSH
- neurochirurgické výkony * metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is complex, balancing the risks of surgical intervention against aneurysm rupture. The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scoring systems have been developed to assist in clinical decision-making, but their efficacy in predicting surgical outcome remains unclear. METHODS: In this monocentric, retrospective, observational study, we included 380 patients with UIA from January 2010 to January 2021. We assessed the predictive value of the PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in determining clinical outcome post-surgery, including different variables. Statistical analyses, including Principal Component Analysis and Multiple logistic and linear regression, were employed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Our cohort of 380 predominantly female patients (71.3%) had a mean age of 54.7 years. The PHASES and UIATS pro-conservative scores were significant predictors of poor clinical outcome (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively), while the ELAPSS score was predictive of new neurological deficits post-surgery (p = 0.01). Aneurysm size was significantly associated with new neurological deficits but not with long-term clinical performance/outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the utility of PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS scores in preoperative risk stratifications. Conservative PHASES and UIATS scores were associated with poor outcome, therefore supporting their predictive value of non-operative management. Our findings suggest the routine implementation of these scores into clinical practice could improve the management of UIAs.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Thompson BG, Brown RD, Amin-Hanjani S et al (2015) Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/american stroke association. Stroke Aug 46(8):2368–2400. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000070 PubMed
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I et al (2002) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet Oct 26(9342):1267–1274. 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6 PubMed
Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J (1998) Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke Jan 29(1):251–256. 10.1161/01.str.29.1.251 PubMed
Staartjes VE, Sebök M, Blum PG et al (2020) Development of machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for unruptured intracranial aneurysm surgery: a pilot study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Nov 162(11):2759–2765. 10.1007/s00701-020-04355-0 PubMed
Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD et al (2014) Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol Jan 13(1):59–66. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 PubMed
Backes D, Rinkel GJ, Laban KG, Algra A, Vergouwen MD (2016) Patient- and aneurysm-Specific risk factors for intracranial aneurysm growth: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke Apr 47(4):951–957. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012162 PubMed
Etminan N, Brown RD, Beseoglu K et al (2015) The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology Sep 08(10):881–889. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891 PubMed PMC
Feghali J, Gami A, Caplan JM, Tamargo RJ, McDougall CG, Huang J (2021) Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: correlation of UIATS, ELAPSS, and PHASES with referral center practice. Neurosurg Rev Jun 44(3):1625–1633. 10.1007/s10143-020-01356-6 PubMed
Liu Q, Yang Y, Yang J et al (2021) Rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysm after admission: A multidimensional nomogram model to risk assessment. Front Aging Neurosci 13:692615. 10.3389/fnagi.2021.692615 PubMed PMC
Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI et al (2019) Procedural clinical complications, Case-Fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol Mar 01(3):282–293. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4165 PubMed PMC
Hügli S, Staartjes VE, Sebök M, Blum PG, Regli L, Esposito G (2023) Differences between real-world and score-based decision-making in the microsurgical management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg Sci Jun 12. 10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06038-1 PubMed