INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care. METHODS: Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death. DISCUSSION: Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.

• MeSH
• autoprotilátky krev   MeSH
• činnosti denního života MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• imunologické faktory terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• intravenózní imunoglobuliny * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• myasthenia gravis * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• receptory cholinergní * imunologie   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales have been proposed but have not undergone multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. METHODS: A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0 (worst) to 3 (excellent) for esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In phase 1, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 images twice, with a 2-week interval between rounds; in phase 2, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one nonexpert endoscopist from 27 endoscopy departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and real-time validation, the scale was applied to consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy at each center. RESULTS: On internal validation, interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95 %CI 0.73-0.87) and 0.80 (95 %CI 0.72-0.86), with reliability of 0.73 (95 %CI 0.63-0.82) and 0.72 (95 %CI 0.63-0.81), in the two rounds, respectively. On external validation, overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95 %CI 0.82-0.88) and reliability was 0.79 (95 %CI 0.73-0.84). In real-time evaluation, the overall proportion of correct classifications was 0.80 (95 %CI 0.77-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement, reliability, and validity. The widespread use of this scale could enhance quality and standardize the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to strive for excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missed lesions.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• duodenum MeSH
• gastroskopie * metody   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• odchylka pozorovatele * MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• žaludeční sliznice MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• validační studie MeSH

OBJECTIVE: Ischemic complications account for significant patient morbidity following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The Prevention and Treatment of Vasospasm with Clazosentan (REACT) study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in preventing clinical deterioration due to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in patients with aSAH. METHODS: REACT was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Eligible patients had aSAH secured by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling, and had presented with thick and diffuse clot on admission CT scan. Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to 15 mg/hour intravenous clazosentan or placebo within 96 hours of the aSAH for up to 14 days, in addition to standard of care treatment including oral or intravenous nimodipine. The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of clinical deterioration due to DCI up to 14 days after initiation of the study drug. The main secondary endpoint was the occurrence of clinically relevant cerebral infarction at day 16 after study drug initiation. Other secondary endpoints included clinical outcome assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at week 12 post-aSAH. Imaging and clinical endpoints were centrally adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 409 patients were randomized between February 2019 and May 2022 across 74 international sites. Three patients did not start study treatment and were not included in the analysis set. The occurrence of clinical deterioration due to DCI was 15.8% (32/202 patients) in the clazosentan group and 17.2% (35/204 patients) in the placebo group, and the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk reduction [RRR] 7.2%, 95% CI -42.6% to 39.6%, p = 0.734). A nonsignificant RRR of 34.1% (95% CI -21.3% to 64.2%, p = 0.177) was observed in clinically relevant cerebral infarcts treated with clazosentan (7.4%, 15/202) versus placebo (11.3%, 23/204). Rescue therapy was less frequently needed for patients treated with clazosentan compared to placebo (10.4%, 21/202 vs 18.1%, 37/204; RRR 42.6%, 95% CI 5.4%-65.2%). A nonsignificant relative risk increase of 25.4% (95% CI -10.7% to 76.0%, p = 0.198) was reported in the risk of poor GOSE and mRS scores with clazosentan (24.8%, 50/202) versus placebo (20.1%, 41/204) at week 12 post-aSAH. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar to those reported previously. CONCLUSIONS: Clazosentan administered for up to 14 days at 15 mg/hour had no significant effect on the occurrence of clinical deterioration due to DCI. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03585270 (ClinicalTrials.gov) EU clinical trial registration no.: 2018-000241-39 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu).

• MeSH
• dioxany * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• intrakraniální vazospazmus etiologie   prevence a kontrola   farmakoterapie   diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• ischemie mozku * prevence a kontrola   etiologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• pyridiny * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• pyrimidiny * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• subarachnoidální krvácení * komplikace   diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• sulfonamidy * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• tetrazoly * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the USA. Here, we report patient-reported outcomes for participants treated with MIRV compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial, which met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival and key secondary endpoints of objective response rate and overall survival. METHODS: The MIRASOL trial was a confirmatory, phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label trial, building on the phase 2 SORAYA trial which had previously demonstrated the safety and efficacy of MIRV in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients 18 years or older with a confirmed platinum-resistant, recurrent high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis were recruited from 253 sites including hospitals, academic centres, and community centres in 21 countries. Patients must have received one to three previous systemic anticancer therapies, and have high FRα tumour expression (≥75% tumour cells with an immunohistochemistry score of ≥2+ membrane staining using the PS2+ scoring method), one or more lesions with measurable disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to MIRV or investigator's choice of chemotherapy, stratified by number of previous therapy lines and the type of investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Therapies were administered in an open-label manner; MIRV was administered intravenously at 6 mg/kg of adjusted ideal bodyweight every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate, overall survival, and a 15·0-point or greater improvement at week 8 or 9 in abdominal and gastrointestinal symptoms using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28) in the intention-to-treat population. The MIRASOL trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04209855), the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 3045), and the European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT-ov55), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 3, 2020, and Aug 3, 2022, 453 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (227 to the MIRV group and 226 to the investigator's choice of chemotherapy group). All patients were female; 301 (66%) participants were White, 53 (12%) were Asian, 13 (3%) were Black, and 86 (19%) were of another race or not reported; 27 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino. The median follow-up for the study, determined by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, was 13·1 months (95% CI 12·1-14). QLQ-OV28 completion rates were 86% (365 of 425) at baseline and 81% (282 of 349) at week 8 or 9. 34 (21·0%; 95% CI 15·0-28·1) of 162 patients treated with MIRV reported improvement in QLQ-OV28 abdominal and gastrointestinal scores, compared with 23 (15·3%; 10·0-22·1) of 150 patients treated with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy. These differences were not statistically significant (odds ratio 1·5 [95% CI 0·8-2·6]; p=0·26). INTERPRETATION: MIRV did not seem to impair or improve patient quality of life compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The similar quality-of-life outcomes in the two treatment groups, combined with the previously reported higher efficacy of MIRV compared with single-agent chemotherapy, support MIRV as new treatment option for FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. FUNDING: AbbVie.

• MeSH
• chemorezistence * účinky léků   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• epiteliální ovariální karcinom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• folátový receptor 1 * metabolismus   antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• imunokonjugáty * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• maytansin * analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• nádory vaječníků * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   metabolismus   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: N-acetyl-l-leucine (NALL) has been established to improve the neurologic manifestations of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) after 12 weeks in a placebo-controlled trial. In the open-label extension phase (EP) follow-up, data were obtained after 12 and 18 months to evaluate the long-term effects of NALL for NPC. METHODS: This is an ongoing, multinational, multicenter EP. Patients with a genetic diagnosis of NPC aged 4 years or older who completed the placebo-controlled trial were eligible to continue in the EP and receive orally administered NALL 2-3 times per day in 3 tiers of weight-based dosing. The primary end point is the modified 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPC-CSS) (range 0-25 points; lower score representing better neurologic status); data from the EP cohort are compared with the expected annual trajectory of decline (i.e., disease progression) established in natural history studies. Analyses are also performed on exploratory end points, including the 15-domain and 4-domain NPC-CSSs and the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients aged 5-67 years (45.3% female, 54.7% male) were enrolled in the EP. After 12 months, the mean (±SD) change from baseline on the 5-domain NPC-CSS was -0.27 (±2.42) with NALL vs +1.5 (±3.16) in the historical cohort (95% CI -3.05 to -0.48; p = 0.009), corresponding to a 118% reduction in annual disease progression. After 18 months, the mean (±SD) change was +0.05 (±2.95) with NALL vs +2.25 (±4.74) in the historical cohort (95% CI -4.06 to -0.35; p = 0.023). The 15-domain and 4-domain NPC-CSSs were consistent with the 5-domain NPC-CSS. The improvements in neurologic manifestations demonstrated in the placebo-controlled trial on the primary SARA end point were sustained over the long-term follow-up. NALL was well tolerated, and no treatment-related adverse events or serious reactions occurred. DISCUSSION: Treatment with NALL was associated with a significant reduction in NPC disease progression after 12 and 18 months, demonstrating a disease-modifying, neuroprotective effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05163288; registered December 6, 2021), EudraCT (2021-005356-10). The first patient was enrolled into the EP on March 8, 2023. The trial was funded by IntraBio Inc. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that NALL reduces disease progression in NPC.

• MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• leucin * analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• neuroprotektivní látky * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Niemannova-Pickova nemoc typu C * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• progrese nemoci MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

OBJECTIVES: The phase 3 ProDERM study demonstrated intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was safe and effective in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). This analysis assessed clinical and serological predictors of IVIg response in DM patients from ProDERM. METHODS: ProDERM was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of DM patients. For weeks 0-16, patients received 2.0 g/kg IVIg (Octagam, 10%) or placebo every 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the open-label extension phase, where all received IVIg to week 40. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined associations between baseline variables and total improvement score (TIS), including myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT; assessing different organ involvement), and myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Univariate analyses found no significant association between TIS at week 16 or 40 and age; sex; ethnicity; disease duration/activity; cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal or muscle disease activity; or previous failed or concomitant medications. Multivariate analysis found patients with higher MDAAT cutaneous scores had a better chance of at least minimal TIS improvement. Higher MDAAT pulmonary scores were associated with a lower, but still considerable, chance of improvement. Patients with TIF1-γ antibodies had a better TIS response; however, after controlling for cutaneous disease activity, there was no significant association between antibody classification (including anti-TIF1-γ) and efficacy outcome. CONCLUSION: IVIg was effective in treating DM patients regardless of demographic features and autoantibody status (for most autoantibodies). Patients with higher cutaneous disease activity and/or anti-TIF1-γ responded best to IVIg, while pulmonary disease activity predicted a lower, but still effective, IVIg response, warranting further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02728752.

• MeSH
• autoprotilátky krev   imunologie   MeSH
• dermatomyozitida * farmakoterapie   imunologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• imunologické faktory * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• intravenózní imunoglobuliny * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antigen-specific tolerance-inducing therapeutic approaches (products based on peptides, DNA and T cells) versus placebo or other comparators, where possible, in adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for published and unpublished studies. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction for included studies were carried out by two independent reviewers. For efficacy, phase I, II and III clinical trials (randomized/non-randomized; double blind/single blind/unblinded; single-center/multicenter; single-arm/two-arm) and for safety, phase I, II and III clinical trials (randomized/non-randomized; double blind/single blind/unblinded; controlled/uncontrolled; single-center/multicenter; single-arm/two-arm) were included. Observational studies (cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, case studies/reports etc), review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, preclinical and pilot studies were excluded. All included studies were critically appraised using standardized JBI tools, with no exclusions based on methodological quality. Where possible, studies were pooled in statistical meta-analysis, presented in tabular format, and accompanied by narrative synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for grading the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Search yielded 2644 results and in total 26 studies were included in the final analysis. Twelve studies were RCTs and 14 were quasi-experimental. In total, there were 1427 subjects from the RCTs, and 314 from non-RCTs. Sample size of studies ranged from 10 to 612 patients. All studies included adult patients, principally aged 18-55/65 years. Critical appraisal scores for the RCTs were in the range 31% to 92%. For quasi-experimental studies, critical appraisal scores were in the range 45% to 78%. Due to high heterogeneity of the studies, efficacy of all antigen-specific treatment remained ambiguous. For all three types of treatment, there was no statistical difference in occurrence of adverse effects (AEs) between the treatment- and placebo-related AEs (for DNA-based treatment RR was 1.06 (0.94-1.10), p = 0.334; for peptides-base treatments RR was 1.04 (0.90-1.08), p = 0.115; for T-cells-based treatments RR was 1.31 (0.97-1.76), p = 0.08). There were no differences in RR for serious AEs (SAEs) between the treatments either for DNA-based treatment (RR was 0.63 (0.25-1.58), p = 0.322) or peptide-based treatment (RR was 0.86 (0.62-1.19), p = 0.361). There were no reported SAEs for T cell-based treatments, so meta-analysis for these therapies was not performed. The most frequent AEs were local reactions to injection, such as redness, erythema, pain. DISCUSSION: Antigen-specific tolerance-inducing therapeutic approaches appeared to be safe. However, the certainty for these results was very low for SAEs in peptide- and DNA-based therapies, whereas it was low for AEs in DNA- and T cells-based therapies and moderate for AEs in peptide-based therapies. The efficacy of antigen-specific therapies remains ambiguous. Larger, well-designed studies with high level quality are needed to ensure ultimate conclusions. REGISTRATION: The registration number provided following registration of the protocol in PROSPERO is 'CRD42021236776'.

• MeSH
• antigeny * imunologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• roztroušená skleróza * terapie   imunologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

CONTEXT: SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia). OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (NCT04664959). DESIGN: The study included 457 postmenopausal osteoporosis patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at month 0 and month 6. At month 12, patients were rerandomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to month 18. This report includes results up to month 12. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for month 12), total hip, and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to month 12. RESULTS: The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at month 12 were 0.33% (90% CI, -0.25 to 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI, -0.36 to 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the predefined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The reported efficacy, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.

• MeSH
• bederní obratle účinky léků   diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * terapeutické užití   farmakokinetika   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• denosumab * terapeutické užití   farmakokinetika   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• inhibitory kostní resorpce * terapeutické užití   farmakokinetika   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• kostní denzita účinky léků   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• postmenopauzální osteoporóza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Danikopan je selektivní inhibitor faktoru D komplementu, který působí přes alternativní cestu aktivace komplementu. Blokádou alternativní dráhy komplementu danikopan inhibuje extravaskulární hemolýzu (EVH). Účinnost a bezpečnost danikopanu u dospělých pacientů s paroxyzmální noční hemoglobinurií (PNH) s klinicky významnou EVH byly hodnoceny v multicentrické, randomizované, dvojitě zaslepené, placebem kontrolované studii fáze 3 ALXN2040-PNH-301. Danikopan přidaný k ravulizumabu nebo ekulizumabu prokázal superioritu v primárním cílovém parametru zvýšení hladiny hemoglobinu oproti placebu. Danikopan také dosáhl statisticky významného zlepšení ve srovnání s placebem u všech 4 sekundárních cílových parametrů, které byly podíl pacientů se zvýšením hladiny hemoglobinu o ≥ 20 g/l, počet pacientů bez potřeby transfuze, změna ve skóre únavy podle FACIT a změna absolutního počtu retikulocytů. Kombinace léčby danikopanem s inhibitory terminální fáze komplentu C5 stabilizuje i primární intravaskulární hemolýzu danou základním onemocněním PNH. Danikopan je indikován jako přídatná léčba k ravulizumabu nebo ekulizumabu k léčbě dospělých pacientů s paroxyzmální noční hemoglobinurií, kteří mají reziduální hemolytickou anémii.

Danicopan is a selective inhibitor of complement factor D that acts through the alternative pathway of complement activation. By blocking the alternative pathway of complement, danikopan inhibits extravascular hemolysis (EVH). The efficacy and safety of danikopan in adult PNH patients with clinically significant EVH were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study ALXN2040-PNH-301. Danicopan added to ravulizumab or eculizumab demonstrated superiority over placebo in the primary endpoint of increase in hemoglobin levels. Danicopan also achieved statistically significant improvements compared to placebo in all 4 secondary endpoints, which were the proportion of patients with an increase in hemoglobin levels of ≥ 20 g/L, the number of patients without a transfusion, the change in FACIT fatigue score, and the change in absolute reticulocyte count. The combination of danicopan treatment with C5 terminal phase inhibitors also stabilizes primary intravascular hemolysis due to the underlying PNH disease. Danicopan is indicated as an add-on therapy to ravulizumab or eculizumab for the treatment of adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria who have residual hemolytic anemia.

• Klíčová slova
• danikopan,
• MeSH
• komplement - faktor D antagonisté a inhibitory   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• paroxysmální hemoglobinurie * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks substantially impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current World Allergy Organization and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines goals include complete control and normalization of patients' lives. Garadacimab (anti-activated factor XII monoclonal antibody) reduced the mean attack rate after first administration in the pivotal phase III (VANGUARD; NCT04656418) and ongoing long-term phase III open-label extension (OLE) (NCT04739059) studies. Objective: To report exploratory HRQoL data from the interim analysis of the phase III OLE study (data cutoff February 13, 2023). Methods: Patients ages ≥12 years and with HAE received garadacimab 200 mg subcutaneously once monthly in the OLE study. The patient population comprised patients who were garadacimab naive (received placebo in the previous phase III study and newly enrolled patients) and patients who received garadacimab in previous phase II/III studies. The Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) questionnaire, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM II), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH) questionnaire were administered at baseline and every 3 months during the OLE study. AE-QoL and TSQM II scores were evaluated in comparison with minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Results: Overall, 90 patients who were garadacimab naive and 71 patients with previous garadacimab exposure received garadacimab in the phase III OLE study. The mean ± standard deviation AE-QoL total score improved by 34.2 ± 18.8 points in patients who were garadacimab naive and by 2.3 ± 13.1 points further to the reduction experienced in patients with previous garadacimab exposure. The AE-QoL MCID was met by 92.1% of patients who were garadacimab naive; 81.6% of patients with previous garadacimab exposure experienced stable AE-QoL scores or further improvements per MCID. TSQM II scores were improved from day 1 with garadacimab and sustained to month 12. Improvements in WPAI:GH scores were consistent with AE-QoL and TSQM II. Conclusion: Garadacimab elicited clinically meaningful long-term improvements in HRQoL, work productivity, and treatment satisfaction in patients with HAE, which brought them closer to complete disease control and normalization of life.Clinical trial NCT04739059, clinicaltrials.gov.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hereditární angioedémy * farmakoterapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kvalita života * MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• spokojenost pacientů MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH