ctDNA dynamics demonstrates rapid treatment response to tafasitamab + R-CHOP +/- lenalidomide and predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the phase 1b First-MIND study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze I, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
41145670
PubMed Central
PMC12789008
DOI
10.1038/s41375-025-02759-4
PII: 10.1038/s41375-025-02759-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cirkulující nádorová DNA * genetika krev MeSH
- cyklofosfamid terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- difúzní velkobuněčný B-lymfom * farmakoterapie genetika krev mortalita patologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- doxorubicin aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- lenalidomid aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery * genetika krev MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- prednison terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití MeSH
- reziduální nádor genetika MeSH
- rituximab aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vinkristin aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze I MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- cirkulující nádorová DNA * MeSH
- cyklofosfamid MeSH
- doxorubicin MeSH
- lenalidomid MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery * MeSH
- prednison MeSH
- R-CHOP protocol MeSH Prohlížeč
- rituximab MeSH
- vinkristin MeSH
The firstMIND trial (NCT04134936) evaluated the safety and efficacy of adding lenalidomide to R-CHOP+tafasitamab in the first-line treatment settings of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To address response dynamics and the impact of measurable residual disease (MRD), we analyzed prospectively collected plasma samples from 56 study patients using the EuroClonality immunoglobulin gene (IG)-NGS assay. At baseline, disease-related clonotypes were identified in 50/56 (89%) patients by IG-NGS in cell-free (cf)DNA and/or FFPE samples. MRD markers were successfully identified in 49/52 (94%) cfDNA samples and 35/41 (85%) FFPE samples. Baseline cfDNA and circulating tumor (ct)DNA levels correlated with preclinical risk factors, and high cfDNA levels ≥3.35 log10hGE/ml plasma were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR): 3.1). ctDNA clearance was rapid with 52% of patients MRD-negative at C2D1, 83% patients at C4D1, and 82% patients after finishing six 21-day cycles (end of treatment (EOT)) and a sustained treatment response (93% MRD negative) six months after EOT. ctDNA detection was associated with worse PFS outcomes at C2D1 (p = 0.039, HR:4.51, 95%Cl:0.93-21.74), C4D1 (p = 0.07, HR:3.34, 95%Cl:0.83-13.48) and EOT (p = 0.01, HR:6.38, 95%Cl:1.27-32.01) and inferior overall survival at these time points. In PET-positive patients, ctDNA-MRD had a higher specificity rendering PET/CT more precisely.
2nd Medical Department University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
Clinical Biomarkers and Companion Diagnostics MorphoSys a Novartis company Planegg Planegg Germany
Clinical Development MorphoSys a Novartis company Planegg Planegg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Armitage JO. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;89:3909–18. PubMed DOI
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Lee Harris N, Stein H, Siebert R, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:2375–90. PubMed DOI PMC
Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Müeller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the international conference on malignant lymphomas imaging working group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–58. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu Y, Barta SK. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:604–16. PubMed DOI
Kostakoglu L, Martelli M, Sehn LH, Belada D, Carella AM, Chua N, et al. End-of-treatment PET/CT predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL after first-line treatment: results from GOYA. Blood Adv. 2021;5:1283–90. PubMed DOI PMC
Kurtz DM, Green MR, Bratman SV, Scherer F, Liu CL, Kunder CA, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunoglobulin high-throughput sequencing. Blood. 2015;125:3679–87. PubMed DOI PMC
Meriranta L, Alkodsi A, Pasanen A, Lepistö M, Mapar P, Blaker YN, et al. Molecular features encoded in the ctDNA reveal heterogeneity and predict outcome in high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2022;139:1863–77. PubMed DOI
Rossi D, Diop F, Spaccarotella E, Monti S, Zanni M, Rasi S, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma genotyping on the liquid biopsy. Blood. 2017;129:1947–57. PubMed DOI
Belada D, Kopeckova K, Bergua Burgues JM, Stevens D, André M, Persona EP, et al. Safety and efficacy of tafasitamab with or without lenalidomide added to first-line R-CHOP for DLBCL: the phase 1b First-MIND study. Blood. 2023;142:1348–58. PubMed DOI PMC
Nowakowski GS, Duell J, Kopeckova K, Trneny M, Pott C, Khouja M, et al. First-mind: final analysis from a Phase Ib, open-label, randomized study to assess safety of Tafasitamab or Tafasitamab + Lenalidomide in Addition to R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2022;140:3731–3. DOI
Belada D, Kopeckova K, Bergua Burgues JM, Stevens D, André M, Pérez Persona E, et al. First-mind: primary analysis from a phase Ib, open-label, randomized study to assess safety of tafasitamab or Tafasitamab + lenalidomide in addition to R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021;138:3556. DOI
Devonshire AS, Whale AS, Gutteridge A, Jones G, Cowen S, Foy CA, et al. Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:6499–512. PubMed DOI PMC
Pott C, Kotrova M, Darzentas N, Brüggemann M, Khouja M. cfDNA-Based NGS IG analysis in lymphoma. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2453:101–17. PubMed DOI PMC
Brüggemann M, Kotrová M, Knecht H, Bartram J, Boudjogrha M, Bystry V, et al. Standardized next-generation sequencing of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations for MRD marker identification in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; a EuroClonality-NGS validation study. Leukemia. 2019;33:2241–53. PubMed DOI PMC
Knecht H, Reigl T, Kotrová M, Appelt F, Stewart P, Bystry V, et al. Quality control and quantification in IG/TR next-generation sequencing marker identification: protocols and bioinformatic functionalities by EuroClonality-NGS. Leukemia. 2019;33:2254–65. PubMed DOI PMC
Bystry V, Reigl T, Krejci A, Demko M, Hanakova B, Grioni A, et al. ARResT/Interrogate: an interactive immunoprofiler for IG/TR NGS data. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:435–7. PubMed DOI
Della Starza I, Nunes V, Lovisa F, Silvestri D, Cavalli M, Garofalo A, et al. Droplet digital PCR improves IG-/TR-based MRD risk definition in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. HemaSphere. 2021;5:1–7. PubMed PMC
Drandi D, Alcantara M, Benmaad I, Söhlbrandt A, Lhermitte L, Zaccaria G, et al. Droplet digital PCR quantification of mantle cell lymphoma follow-up samples from four prospective trials of the European MCL network. HemaSphere. 2020;4:e347. PubMed DOI PMC
Pott C, Brüggemann M, Ritgen M, van der Velden VHJ, van Dongen JJM, Kneba M MRD detection in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas using Ig gene rearrangements and chromosomal translocations as targets for real-time quantitative PCR. In: PubMed
Alig S, Macaulay CW, Kurtz DM, Dührsen U, Hüttmann A, Schmitz C, et al. Short diagnosis-to-treatment interval is associated with higher circulating tumor DNA levels in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2605–16. PubMed DOI PMC
Herrera AF, Tracy S, Croft B, Opat S, Ray J, Lovejoy AF, et al. Risk profiling of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by measuring circulating tumor DNA. Blood Adv. 2022;6:1651–60. PubMed DOI PMC
Kurtz DM, Esfahani MS, Scherer F, Soo J, Jin MC, Liu CL, et al. Dynamic risk profiling using serial tumor biomarkers for personalized outcome prediction. Cell. 2019;178:699–713. PubMed DOI PMC
Kurtz DM, Scherer F, Jin MC, Soo J, Craig AFM, Esfahani MS, et al. Circulating tumor DNA measurements as early outcome predictors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2845–53. PubMed DOI PMC
Roschewski M, Lindenberg L, Mena E, Lakhotia R, Melani C, Steinberg SM, et al. End-of-treatment response assessment after frontline therapy for aggressive B-Cell lymphoma: landmark comparison of a singular PET/CT scan versus ultrasensitive circulating tumor DNA. Blood. 2023;142:192. DOI
Roschewski M, Rossi D, Kurtz DM, Alizadeh AA, Wilson WH. Circulating tumor DNA in lymphoma: principles and future directions. Blood Cancer Discov. 2022;3:5–15. PubMed DOI PMC