BACKGROUND: An unmet need exists for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) treatment. In an 8-week, phase 2 trial, sparsentan, a dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonist, reduced proteinuria in patients with FSGS. The efficacy and safety of longer-term treatment with sparsentan for FSGS are unknown. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with FSGS (without known secondary causes) who were 8 to 75 years of age; patients were randomly assigned to receive sparsentan or irbesartan (active control) for 108 weeks. The surrogate efficacy end point assessed at the prespecified interim analysis at 36 weeks was the FSGS partial remission of proteinuria end point (defined as a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≤1.5 [with protein and creatinine both measured in grams] and a >40% reduction in the ratio from baseline). The primary efficacy end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope at the time of the final analysis. The change in eGFR from baseline to 4 weeks after the end of treatment (week 112) was a secondary end point. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients underwent randomization: 184 were assigned to receive sparsentan and 187 to receive irbesartan. At 36 weeks, the percentage of patients with partial remission of proteinuria was 42.0% in the sparsentan group and 26.0% in the irbesartan group (P = 0.009), a response that was sustained through 108 weeks. At the time of the final analysis at week 108, there were no significant between-group differences in the eGFR slope; the between-group difference in total slope (day 1 to week 108) was 0.3 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area per year (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.7 to 2.4), and the between-group difference in the slope from week 6 to week 108 (i.e., chronic slope) was 0.9 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year (95% CI, -1.3 to 3.0). The mean change in eGFR from baseline to week 112 was -10.4 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 with sparsentan and -12.1 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 with irbesartan (difference, 1.8 ml per minute per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, -1.4 to 4.9). Sparsentan and irbesartan had similar safety profiles, and the frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with FSGS, there were no significant between-group differences in eGFR slope at 108 weeks, despite a greater reduction in proteinuria with sparsentan than with irbesartan. (Funded by Travere Therapeutics; DUPLEX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03493685.).
- MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fokálně segmentální glomeruloskleróza * komplikace farmakoterapie patofyziologie MeSH
- hodnoty glomerulární filtrace MeSH
- indukce remise MeSH
- irbesartan * aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- kreatinin MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- proteinurie * farmakoterapie etiologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Sparsentan, a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist, significantly reduced proteinuria versus irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, at 36 weeks (primary endpoint) in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the phase 3 PROTECT trial's previously reported interim analysis. Here, we report kidney function and outcomes over 110 weeks from the double-blind final analysis. METHODS: PROTECT, a double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 study, was done across 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries throughout the Americas, Asia, and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven primary IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of at least 1·0 g per day despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibition for at least 12 weeks were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sparsentan (target dose 400 mg oral sparsentan once daily) or irbesartan (target dose 300 mg oral irbesartan once daily) based on a permuted-block randomisation method. The primary endpoint was proteinuria change between treatment groups at 36 weeks. Secondary endpoints included rate of change (slope) of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), changes in proteinuria, a composite of kidney failure (confirmed 40% eGFR reduction, end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality), and safety and tolerability up to 110 weeks from randomisation. Secondary efficacy outcomes were assessed in the full analysis set and safety was assessed in the safety set, both of which were defined as all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of randomly assigned study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 203 patients were randomly assigned to the sparsentan group and 203 to the irbesartan group. One patient from each group did not receive the study drug and was excluded from the efficacy and safety analyses (282 [70%] of 404 included patients were male and 272 [67%] were White) . Patients in the sparsentan group had a slower rate of eGFR decline than those in the irbesartan group. eGFR chronic 2-year slope (weeks 6-110) was -2·7 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year versus -3·8 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (difference 1·1 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year, 95% CI 0·1 to 2·1; p=0·037); total 2-year slope (day 1-week 110) was -2·9 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year versus -3·9 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (difference 1·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year, 95% CI -0·03 to 1·94; p=0·058). The significant reduction in proteinuria at 36 weeks with sparsentan was maintained throughout the study period; at 110 weeks, proteinuria, as determined by the change from baseline in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, was 40% lower in the sparsentan group than in the irbesartan group (-42·8%, 95% CI -49·8 to -35·0, with sparsentan versus -4·4%, -15·8 to 8·7, with irbesartan; geometric least-squares mean ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·50 to 0·72). The composite kidney failure endpoint was reached by 18 (9%) of 202 patients in the sparsentan group versus 26 (13%) of 202 patients in the irbesartan group (relative risk 0·7, 95% CI 0·4 to 1·2). Treatment-emergent adverse events were well balanced between sparsentan and irbesartan, with no new safety signals. INTERPRETATION: Over 110 weeks, treatment with sparsentan versus maximally titrated irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy resulted in significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function. FUNDING: Travere Therapeutics.
- MeSH
- antagonisté receptorů pro angiotenzin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- chronické selhání ledvin * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- IgA nefropatie * farmakoterapie MeSH
- irbesartan škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- proteinurie farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerular disease worldwide, with an estimated annual incidence of 25 per million adults. Despite optimized supportive care, some patients fail to achieve disease control and suffer progressive deterioration of kidney function. In this subpopulation of patients, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2021 guidelines recommend consideration of corticosteroids; however, their use is associated with significant side effects. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to identify corticosteroid-sparing therapies to help improve treatment and prognosis for patients with IgAN. It has been well-documented that the complement system plays a significant role in IgAN pathogenesis, and several complement inhibitors are now entering late-stage clinical development. This review evaluates what we know about the role of complement in the pathophysiology of IgAN and considers how the availability of targeted complement inhibitors may impact future clinical practice. Key knowledge gaps are evaluated, and research opportunities are recommended to help guide clinical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes. Such gaps include evaluating the relative contribution of the alternative and lectin pathways to disease pathogenesis, and the importance of determining the dominant pathway driving IgAN progression. Continued research into the staining of complement proteins in kidney biopsies and identifying targeted biomarkers to assess disease progression and treatment responses will also be needed to support the implementation of newer therapies in clinical practice. Considering the future horizons for enhancing the care of patients with IgAN, tackling the outstanding challenges now will help prepare for the best possible future outcomes.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a progressive form of kidney disease defined by glomerular deposition of IgA. Here we performed a genome-wide association study of 10,146 kidney-biopsy-diagnosed IgAN cases and 28,751 controls across 17 international cohorts. We defined 30 genome-wide significant risk loci explaining 11% of disease risk. A total of 16 loci were new, including TNFSF4/TNFSF18, REL, CD28, PF4V1, LY86, LYN, ANXA3, TNFSF8/TNFSF15, REEP3, ZMIZ1, OVOL1/RELA, ETS1, IGH, IRF8, TNFRSF13B and FCAR. The risk loci were enriched in gene orthologs causing abnormal IgA levels when genetically manipulated in mice. We also observed a positive genetic correlation between IgAN and serum IgA levels. High polygenic score for IgAN was associated with earlier onset of kidney failure. In a comprehensive functional annotation analysis of candidate causal genes, we observed convergence of biological candidates on a common set of inflammatory signaling pathways and cytokine ligand-receptor pairs, prioritizing potential new drug targets.
- MeSH
- celogenomová asociační studie MeSH
- IgA nefropatie * farmakoterapie genetika diagnóza MeSH
- imunoglobulin A genetika MeSH
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
Rationale & Objective: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries. Setting & Participants: Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach: Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs. Results: We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, -25.03; 95% CI, -59.33 to -9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, -7.61 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI, -14.98 to 0.25 mL/min/1.73 m2). Immunosuppressant therapy had an uncertain effect on reducing the chronic kidney failure risk. Hypertension and infections were the most commonly reported adverse events. Limitations: Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient-level data. Conclusions: This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Rationale and Objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] inhibitor) to control proteinuria in primary and genetic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) follows guidelines based on other proteinuria-related kidney diseases. There is no consensus on the efficacy and safety of RAAS inhibitor therapies in primary and genetic FSGS. This systematic review assessed the effects of RAAS inhibitor therapy on kidney outcomes in these patients. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized studies, observational studies, and retrospective studies. Setting & Study Populations: Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach: Results were summarized as the ratio of means (ROM) between baseline and follow-up measurements or as the hazard ratio using random-effects models. Results: 30 publications were selected; 5 were controlled trials (4 randomized controlled trials). 8 assessed RAAS inhibitor monotherapy, while the rest studied RAAS inhibitors in combination with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. On average, a 32% proteinuria reduction (ROM, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98) and no change in creatinine clearance (ROM, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.16) from baseline to the last reported follow-up was observed in patients treated with RAAS inhibitor monotherapy. When a RAAS inhibitor was combined with other drugs, a 72% proteinuria reduction was observed from baseline to the last reported follow-up (ROM, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.75). The published data did not allow for the assessment of the effects of RAAS inhibitor monotherapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate and end-stage kidney disease risks. Limitations: Large study heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and treatment regimens. No access to individual patient-level data. Conclusions: This review supports the tendency to observe a proteinuria reduction with RAAS inhibitors in patients with primary FSGS. RAAS inhibitor monotherapy was associated with maintained kidney function, as shown by no change in creatinine clearance. Strong evidence to quantify the effects of RAAS inhibitor monotherapy on end-stage kidney disease and glomerular filtration rate was lacking. Larger, well-designed clinical trials are needed to better understand the effects of RAAS inhibitors on primary FSGS.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases is an update to the KDIGO 2012 guideline. The aim is to assist clinicians caring for individuals with glomerulonephritis (GN), both adults and children. The scope includes various glomerular diseases, including IgA nephropathy and IgA vasculitis, membranous nephropathy, nephrotic syndrome, minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), infection-related GN, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis, lupus nephritis, and anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody GN. In addition, this guideline will be the first to address the subtype of complement-mediated diseases. Each chapter follows the same format providing guidance related to diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and special situations. The goal of the guideline is to generate a useful resource for clinicians and patients by providing actionable recommendations based on evidence syntheses, with useful infographics incorporating views from experts in the field. Another aim is to propose research recommendations for areas where there are gaps in knowledge. The guideline targets a broad global audience of clinicians treating GN while being mindful of implications for policy and cost. Development of this guideline update followed an explicit process whereby treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies, and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, with areas of future research also presented.
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glomerulonefritida * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- IgA nefropatie * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- ledviny MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lipoidní nefróza * MeSH
- membranózní glomerulonefritida * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of primary nephrotic syndrome among adults. The identification of phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) as target antigen in most patients changed the management of MN dramatically, and provided a rationale for B-cell depleting agents such as rituximab. The efficacy of rituximab in inducing remission has been investigated in several studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, in which complete and partial remission of proteinuria was achieved in approximately two-thirds of treated patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, rituximab is now considered a first-line treatment option for MN, especially in patients at moderate and high risk of deterioration in kidney function. However, questions remain about how to best use rituximab, including the optimal dosing regimen, a potential need for maintenance therapy, and assessment of long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature and discuss both strengths and limitations of "the new standard."
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
