INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are well known, but less is known about factors influencing the interval between radiotherapy and the onset of ORN. Also, it is unknown whether there is any specific period post-radiotherapy with a reduced probability of ORN when irradiated teeth require extraction. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the interval in developing ORN in the following subgroups of patients: (1) patients who spontaneously developed ORN, (2) surgical-intervention-related ORN with a particular focus on patients after mandibulectomy. The secondary aim was to attempt to identify a possible time for safer dental intervention after primary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analysed 1608 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated in a single centre. Time intervals were measured from the end of radiotherapy to the development of ORN and further analysed in the subgroups listed above. RESULTS: In all, 141 patients (8.8%) developed intra-oral ORN. Median time from radiotherapy to ORN development in the whole cohort was 9 months. Median interval for spontaneous ORN was 8 months, 6.5 months for intervention-related ORN, and 15 months for patients post-mandibulectomy. In patients who required dental extraction preradiotherapy, median interval of ORN onset was 5 months. CONCLUSION: In our study, a slightly higher proportion of patients with intervention developed ORN earlier in comparison with spontaneous ORN. The period from 12-18 months after radiotherapy was identified as having the highest probability of developing ORN in patients after mandibulectomy. A time for safer dental intervention after primary treatment was not identified.

• Keywords
• Dental intervention, Head and neck cancer, Osteoradionecrosis, Radiotherapy, Time factors,
• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Tooth Extraction * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mandibular Osteotomy MeSH
• Head and Neck Neoplasms radiotherapy   surgery   MeSH
• Osteoradionecrosis * etiology   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: This 20-year retrospective study aimed to evaluate the treatment methods used in patients with impacted maxillary permanent canines and to determine the occurrence of ankylotic and resorptive processes and their association with potential risk factors. METHODS: The cohort consisted of 351 consecutive Caucasian patients (120 males and 231 females, mean age 18.4 and 19.9 years, respectively) with 420 impacted maxillary permanent canines. CT and CBCT findings were subsequently confirmed during surgery. Statistical analyses were performed by the generalized linear models, Pearson x2 and Fisher exact tests using the statistical programs R and Statistica v. 14. RESULTS: A total of 273 (65.0%) impacted canines were aligned in the dental arch by orthodontic traction after surgical exposure, this treatment was predominant in patients under 20 years of age. Surgical extraction was performed in 115 (27.2%) impacted canines and was more common in older patients. Ankylotic changes were recorded in 61 (14.5%) impacted canines. The probability of ankylosis increased with age, particularly after the patient's 20th year of life (p < 0.001). Patients were 1.2% likely to develop ankylosis at age 15 years, 4.3% at age 20 years, 14.1% at age 25 years, and 96.8% at age 45 years. Invasive cervical root resorption (ICRR) was found in 8 (1.9%) canines. In 4 canines (1.0%), root ankylosis in addition to ICRR was observed. In contrast to ankylosis, whose frequency of occurrence increased with age, the occurrence of ICRR resulting from PDL damage during surgery was more typical in younger patients. Canines in a high position above the root apices of the adjacent teeth, with a horizontal inclination of the longitudinal axis, with the crown located deep in the center of the alveolar bone and with labiopalatal position, should be considered critically impacted canines with a high risk to failure of orthodontic traction. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the treatment of impacted canines depends mainly on the age of the patient, and the position and inclination of the longitudinal axis of the impacted tooth. To select an adequate treatment method, we recommend CBCT examination, which allows a precise analysis of the position of impacted canines.

• Keywords
• Ankylosis, Autotransplantation, CBCT, Impacted canines, Invasive cervical root resorption, Orthodontic treatment, Replacement root resorption, Surgical extraction,
• MeSH
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Tooth Extraction MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Maxilla * surgery   MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Orthodontic Extrusion methods   MeSH
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
• Cone-Beam Computed Tomography * MeSH
• Root Resorption diagnostic imaging   etiology   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Cuspid * diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Age Factors MeSH
• Tooth, Impacted * surgery   diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Tooth Ankylosis * diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: Tooth extraction is a common surgical procedure where the invasiveness of the surgery can affect the nature of the dentoalveolar remodelling which follows. However, there is very little biomechanical data relating the loading applied during tooth extraction to the outcomes of the procedure. The purpose of this pilot study is to present a novel ex vivo experimental method for measuring tooth extraction mechanics and to explore preliminary metrics for predicting extraction success. METHODS: A custom experimental apparatus was developed in-house to extract central incisors from ex vivo swine mandible samples. Twenty-five (n = 25) incisors were extracted at different rates in displacement- and force-control, along with an intermittent ramp-hold scheme for a total of five schemes. Peak forces and extraction success were recorded for each test. Video analysis assisted in determining the instantaneous stiffnesses of the dental complex during continuous extractions, which were compared using the K-means clustering algorithm. FINDINGS: Tooth extraction forces ranged from 102 N to 309 N, with higher-rate tests tending towards higher peak forces (141 N - 308 N) than the lower-rate tests (102 N-204 N) for displacement- and force-controlled schemes. The K-means algorithm clearly identified load rates among tests, indicating that higher-rate loading increased system stiffness relative to the lower-rate tests. INTERPRETATION: The developed experimental method demonstrated a desirable degree of control. The preliminary results suggest the influence of load rate on the mechanical response of the dental complex and extraction outcome. Future work will further investigate the biomechanics of tooth extraction and relate them to tissue damage to improve future tooth extraction procedures.

• Keywords
• Atraumatic extraction, Dental biomechanics, Exodontia, Experimental methods, Tooth extraction,
• MeSH
• Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
• Tooth Extraction * methods   MeSH
• Mandible surgery   MeSH
• Mechanical Phenomena * MeSH
• Pilot Projects MeSH
• Swine MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have assessed different aspects concerning the applications of i-PRF in the oral cavity. However, nothing is known regarding patients' perceptions of the injection of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). OBJECTIVES: To investigate patients' perceptions after injecting platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the course of retracting upper canines. METHODS: Twenty-one patients, whose treatments required extractions of both upper first premolars, were recruited. Extraction side was randomly allocated to the intervention or control sides. After the alignment phase, i-PRF was injected twice with a one-month interval on the buccal and palatal aspects of the extraction sites (intervention side). Patients' perceptions were evaluated with two questionnaires: the first was used to assess the level of pain, discomfort, swelling, eating and swallowing difficulties as well as jaw movement restriction after 1 h (T1), 2 h (T2), 6 h (T3), 24 h (T4) and 48 h (T5) of the second injection; the second questionnaire was used to assess the acceptance of the i-PRF injection and overall satisfaction with this technique at the end of canine retraction phase. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was adopted for this purpose. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to compare between both sides at all time points while Friedman's Test was the selected test for detecting variables' changes over time. Post-hoc Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Rank Tests were applied when any of the results were significant. As to the multiplicity of tests, Bonferroni Correction was implemented. RESULTS: Pain and swelling levels were significantly higher on the experimental compared to the control sides at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05), whereas they declined sharply and went back to almost normal values at T4 (after 24 h). At T5 they were 0. Discomfort and difficulty in mastication on intervention sides were significant only at T1 and T2. Pain, swelling, and chewing difficulties were significant (P < 0.001) during the 4 assessed time points. The increase was insignificant regarding swallowing difficulties and jaw movement limitations at all time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Injecting autologous (i-PRF) during orthodontic canine retraction is a well-perceived and well-tolerated method due to the limited discomfort which significantly diminishes 24 h afterwards. TRIAL'S REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier Number: NCT03399422. 16/01/2018).

• Keywords
• Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF), Maxillary canine retraction, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), Quality of Life (QoL), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),
• MeSH
• Tooth Extraction methods   MeSH
• Platelet-Rich Fibrin * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Pain, Postoperative MeSH
• Dental Care MeSH
• Mouth MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

This study evaluated patient's perception of recovery following surgical removal of mandibular third molars (SRM3s) including analyze of potential risk factors associated with impaired convalescent. Patient related parameters combined with preoperative questionnaires including Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, Oral Health Impact Profile-14, and Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth index were correlated with questionnaires assessing pain, swelling, trismus, sick leave, social and working isolation, physical appearance, eating and speaking ability, diet variations, sleep impairment, impaired sensation of the lip, chin, and tongue, one month following SRM3s. Totally, 412 patients (223 females, 189 males) with mean age of 29.4 years were included. Treatment satisfaction and willingness to undergo similar surgery were reported by 92% and 95%, although 21% reported that the surgery and postoperative period had been worse than expected. Mean days with pain, sick leave, and swelling were 3.6, 2.1, and 3.6, respectively. Preoperative symptoms, dental anxiety level, and prolonged surgical time were associated with increased pain and swelling (P < 0.05). Pell and Gregory classification (I-IIIC) were associated with impaired sensation of the lower lip and chin (P < 0.05). Consequently, results from this study improve the surgeon's ability to predict parameters that predisposed to impaired recovery and neurosensory disturbances following SRM3s.

• Keywords
• Dentistry, Multicenter study, Patient reported outcome measures, Surgery, Surveys and questionnaires, Third molar,
• MeSH
• Pain etiology   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Tooth Extraction adverse effects   MeSH
• Hypesthesia etiology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mandible surgery   MeSH
• Molar, Third * surgery   MeSH
• Perception MeSH
• Pain, Postoperative etiology   MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Tooth, Impacted * surgery   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

Due to a broad spectrum of endodontic rotary instruments on the market and no standardised protocol for comparing their mechanical properties, it can be challenging for clinician to choose proper instruments. In vitro studies using resin blocks with artificial canals can offer many valuable information because of their uniformity compared to studies performed on extracted teeth. To improve precision and reproducibility of artificial canals, 3D printing was used in this study to manufacture endodontic test block samples. 20 commercially available endodontic blocks Endo-Training-Bloc-J by Dentsply Sirona were tested. The mean values of the measured parameters were used for a 3D CAD model of their replicas. 20 copies of the endodontic training blocks were printed from acrylic resin (VeroClear-RGD810, Stratasys, Eden Prairie, USA) using the 3D printer Objet30 Pro (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, USA). The key dimensions of the commercial blocks and the 3D printed blocks were measured under and compared using t - test and Levene's test for equality of variances. The profiles of the 3D printed artificial canals showed significantly lower dimensional variability when compared with the commercial blocks. 3D polyjet printing proved to be a precise and reproducible method for production of blocks for testing endodontic rotary instruments.

• Keywords
• 3D printing, J shape resin block, PolyJet printing, additive manufacturing, artificial root canal, endodontic training block,
• MeSH
• Printing, Three-Dimensional MeSH
• Endometriosis * MeSH
• Tooth Extraction MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Reproducibility of Results MeSH
• Research Design * MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: The rate of reparative osteogenesis controls when an implant is sufficiently stable as to allow functional loading. Using a mini pig model, the rate of reparative osteogenesis in two types of implant sites for example, an osteotomy versus a fresh extraction socket were compared. METHODS: Eight adult mini pigs were used for the study. In phase I, three premolars were extracted on one side of the oral cavity; 12 weeks later, in phase II, osteotomies were produced in healed extraction sites, and contralateral premolars were extracted. Animals were sacrificed 1, 5, and 12 weeks after phase II. Bone repair and remodeling were evaluated using quantitative micro-computed tomographic imaging, histology, and histochemical assays coupled with quantitative dynamic histomorphometry. RESULTS: One week after surgery, extraction sockets and osteotomy sites exhibited similar patterns of new bone deposition. Five weeks after surgery, mineral apposition rates (MARs) were elevated at the injury sites relative to intact bone. Twelve weeks after surgery, the density of new bone in both injury sites was equivalent to intact bone but quantitative dynamic histomorphometry and cellular activity assays demonstrated bone remodeling was still underway. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanisms and rates of reparative osteogenesis were equivalent between fresh extraction sockets and osteotomies. The volume of new bone required to fill a socket, however, was significantly greater than the volume required to fill an osteotomy. These data provide a framework for estimating the rate of reparative osteogenesis and the time to loading of implants placed in healed sites versus fresh extraction sockets.

• Keywords
• bone remodeling, miniature swine, osteogenesis, osteotomy, tooth extraction,
• MeSH
• Dental Implantation, Endosseous methods   MeSH
• Tooth Extraction methods   MeSH
• Swine, Miniature MeSH
• Swine MeSH
• Bicuspid surgery   MeSH
• Bone Remodeling MeSH
• Dental Implants * MeSH
• Tooth Socket * diagnostic imaging   surgery   MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Dental Implants * MeSH

In head and neck cancer (HNC), osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most significant complications of radiotherapy (RT). With an absence of effective non-surgical treatment, prevention of the development of ORN is the best approach. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for the development of ORN in HNC. Records of 1,118 patients with HNC treated with radical RT (≥55Gy) from January 2010 to December 2019 were reviewed. After applying the exclusion criteria, 935 patients were included in the final analysis. In patients with confirmed ORN, exact RT doses were mapped. In total, 91 patients were found (9.7%) with a median (range) time of eight (3-89) months to the development of ORN. Smoking, having a primary site in the oropharynx, bone surgery before adjuvant RT, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy, the presence of xerostomia, dental extraction pre-RT, the time ≤20 days between dental extraction and start of RT, and receiving >55Gy RT dose were significant factors for its development. This comprehensive analysis including the precise RT dose mapping has shown the risk factors for the development of ORN. In practice, every effort should be made to avoid these risk factors without compromising the oncology treatment. The findings of this analysis may provide a basis for future prospective research on this topic.

• Keywords
• Organ at Risk (OAR), Osteoradionecrosis, dental extraction, radiotherapy,
• MeSH
• Tooth Extraction adverse effects   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Head and Neck Neoplasms * complications   MeSH
• Osteoradionecrosis * etiology   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Iatrogenic mandible fracture is a rare complication of a tooth extraction with an incidence between 0.0033-0.0034%. This study retrospectively analyzes a total of 8 patients who underwent lower molar extraction associated with mandible fracture during tooth removal in the period from April 2006 to March 2019. The assessed parameters were age and sex of patients, method of tooth extraction, side distribution of fracture, type of extracted tooth, the position of a lower third molar, presence of bone pathological lesion formed in connection with a tooth, displacement of bone fragments, and sensory impairment in the innervation area of the mental nerve. The position and impaction of the lower third molars were evaluated according to Pell and Gregory's classification and Winter's classification. One fracture was left-sided, and 7 fractures were right-sided. In 6 cases, Winter's extraction elevator was used. In 7 patients, the mandible fracture was treated surgically by performing stable osteosynthesis with the plates and screws. One patient was treated conservatively. This work analyzes the causes of iatrogenic mandible fractures and provides recommendations to reduce the risk of their occurrence.

• Keywords
• Iatrogenic fracture, complications, dental elevator, lower jaw, tooth extraction,
• MeSH
• Tooth Extraction adverse effects   MeSH
• Mandibular Fractures etiology   therapy   MeSH
• Iatrogenic Disease MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Molar, Third surgery   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Alveolar osteitis (AO) is a common complication following the extraction of the teeth, particularly the lower third molars. It starts within a few days after the extraction and manifests mainly as pain in the extraction site. Several strategies of treatment are available in order to relieve pain and heal the extraction wound. Recently, a novel medical device combining hyaluronic acid (HA) and octenidine (OCT) was introduced for the treatment of AO. This series of case reports aims to summarize the initial clinical experiences with this new device and to highlight factors possibly interfering with this treatment. The medical documentation of five patients with similar initial situations treated for AO with HA + OCT device was analyzed in detail. Smoking and previous treatment with Alveogyl (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) were identified as factors interfering with the AO treatment with the HA + OCT device. In three patients without these risk factors, the treatment led to recovery within two or three days. The patient pretreated with Alveogyl and the smoker required six and seven applications of the HA + OCT device, respectively. According to these initial observations, it seems smoking and previous treatment with Alveogyl prolong the treatment of AO using the HA + OCT device that, in turn, shows a rapid effect if these risk factors are not present.

• Keywords
• Alveolar osteitis, hyaluronic acid, octenidine, risk factors, smoking, treatment effectivity, wound healing,
• MeSH
• Pain drug therapy   etiology   physiopathology   surgery   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Tooth Extraction adverse effects   MeSH
• Drug Combinations MeSH
• Wound Healing drug effects   physiology   MeSH
• Imines therapeutic use   MeSH
• Hydrocarbons, Iodinated adverse effects   MeSH
• Smoking adverse effects   MeSH
• Creosote adverse effects   MeSH
• Hyaluronic Acid therapeutic use   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Molar surgery   MeSH
• Dry Socket drug therapy   etiology   physiopathology   surgery   MeSH
• Pyridines therapeutic use   MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Thymol MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Equipment and Supplies MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Case Reports MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Drug Combinations MeSH
• Imines MeSH
• Hydrocarbons, Iodinated MeSH
• Creosote MeSH
• Hyaluronic Acid MeSH
• octenidine MeSH Browser
• Pyridines MeSH
• Septodont MeSH Browser
• Thymol MeSH