Chickens represent one of the most important sources of animal protein for the human population. However, chickens also represent one of the most important reservoirs of Salmonella for humans. Measures to decrease the Salmonella incidence in chickens are therefore continuously sought. In this study, we tested feed supplementation with a mixture of C1 to C12 monoacylglycerides. At 0.7 and 1.5 kg per ton of feed, such supplementation significantly decreased Salmonella counts in the caecum but not in the liver. The chickens were infected on day 4 and the protective effect in the caecum was recorded on day 22 and 23 of life. Supplementation also decreased the inflammatory response of chickens to Salmonella infection determined by avidin, SAA, ExFABP, MMP7, IL1β, IL4I and MRP126 gene expression but did not affect immunoglobulin expression in the caecum. C1 to C12 monoacylglycerides can be used as a feed supplement which, if continuously provided in feed, decrease Salmonella counts in chickens just prior slaughter.

• Keywords
• Caecum, Chicken, Monoacylglyceride, Salmonella,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

There are extensive differences in the caecal microbiota of chicks from hatcheries and those inoculated with faecal material from adult hens. Besides differences in microbial composition, the latter chickens are highly resistant to Salmonella Enteritidis challenges, while the former are susceptible. In this study, we tested whether strains from genera Bacteroides, Megamonas, or Megasphaera can increase chicken resistance to Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni when defined microbial mixtures consisting of these bacterial genera are administered. Mixtures consisting of different species and strains from the above-mentioned genera efficiently colonised the chicken caecum and increased chicken resistance to Salmonella by a factor of 50. The tested mixtures were even more effective in protecting chickens from Salmonella in a seeder model of infection (3-5 log reduction). The tested mixtures partially protected chickens from C. jejuni infection, though the effect was lower than that against Salmonella. The obtained data represent a first step for the development of a new type of probiotics for poultry.

• Keywords
• Bacteroides, Megamonas, Megasphaera, caecum, chicken, microbiota, probiotics,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

The chicken caecum is colonised by hundreds of different bacterial species. Which of these are targeted by immunoglobulins and how immunoglobulin expression shapes chicken caecal microbiota has been addressed in this study. Using cell sorting followed by sequencing of V3/V4 variable region of 16S rRNA, bacterial species with increased or decreased immunoglobulin coating were determined. Next, we determined also caecal microbiota composition in immunoglobulin knockout chickens. We found that immunoglobulin coating was common and major taxa were coated with immunoglobulins. Similarly, more taxa required immunoglobulin production for caecum colonisation compared to those which became abundant in immunoglobulin-deficient chickens. Taxa with low immunoglobulin coating such as Lactobacillus, Blautia, [Eubacterium] hallii, Megamonas, Fusobacterium and Desulfovibrio all encode S-layer proteins which may reduce interactions with immunoglobulins. Although there were taxa which overgrew in Ig-deficient chickens (e.g. Akkermansia) indicating immunoglobulin production acted to exclude them from the chicken caecum, in most of the cases, immunoglobulin production more likely contributed to fixing the desired microbiota in the chicken caecum.

• MeSH
• Bacteria classification   genetics   MeSH
• Cecum * microbiology   MeSH
• Immunoglobulins * MeSH
• Chickens * microbiology   immunology   MeSH
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S * genetics   MeSH
• Gastrointestinal Microbiome * MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Immunoglobulins * MeSH
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S * MeSH

Complex gut microbiota increases chickens' resistance to enteric pathogens. However, the principles of this phenomenon are not understood in detail. One of the possibilities for how to decipher the role of gut microbiota in chickens' resistance to enteric pathogens is to systematically characterise the gene expression of individual gut microbiota members colonising the chicken caecum. To reach this aim, newly hatched chicks were inoculated with bacterial species whose whole genomic sequence was known. Total protein purified from the chicken caecum was analysed by mass spectrometry, and the obtained spectra were searched against strain-specific protein databases generated from known genomic sequences. Campylobacter jejuni, Phascolarctobacterium sp. and Sutterella massiliensis did not utilise carbohydrates when colonising the chicken caecum. On the other hand, Bacteroides, Mediterranea, Marseilla, Megamonas, Megasphaera, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Escherichia coli and Succinatimonas fermented carbohydrates. C. jejuni was the only motile bacterium, and Bacteroides mediterraneensis expressed the type VI secretion system. Classification of in vivo expression is key for understanding the role of individual species in complex microbial populations colonising the intestinal tract. Knowledge of the expression of motility, the type VI secretion system, and preference for carbohydrate or amino acid fermentation is important for the selection of bacteria for defined competitive exclusion products.

• Keywords
• anaerobe, caecum, chicken microbiota, gene expression, mass spectrometry, metabolism,
• MeSH
• Amino Acids MeSH
• Bacteria, Anaerobic * metabolism   MeSH
• Cecum microbiology   MeSH
• Chickens * microbiology   MeSH
• Carbohydrate Metabolism MeSH
• Type IV Secretion Systems MeSH
• Gastrointestinal Microbiome * MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Amino Acids MeSH
• Type IV Secretion Systems MeSH

An experimental group of one-day-old chicken from a commercial hatchery was given a defined mixture of 7 gut anaerobes. The next day the chicks were inoculated by an APEC strain O78:H4-ST117 resistant to ciprofloxacin, alongside with the control group and monitored for 4 wk after the inoculation for the presence of the colonizing strains and ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli. Significant reduction of colonization rates in the first 2 wk was recorded in the experimental group for the numbers of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli. The results show that colonization of chicken by defined anaerobic mixtures may provide a decisive protection during the critical period of the chicken intestinal microflora development.

• Keywords
• avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), chicken, colonization, competitive exclusion, probiotics,
• MeSH
• Bacteroides MeSH
• Ciprofloxacin pharmacology   MeSH
• Escherichia coli MeSH
• Escherichia coli Infections * prevention & control   veterinary   MeSH
• Chickens MeSH
• Poultry Diseases * prevention & control   MeSH
• Probiotics * pharmacology   MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Ciprofloxacin MeSH

Chickens are in constant interaction with their environment, e.g., bedding and litter, and their microbiota. However, how litter microbiota develops over time and whether bedding and litter microbiota may affect the cecal microbiota is not clear. We addressed these questions using sequencing of V3/V4 variable region of 16S rRNA genes of cecal, bedding, and litter samples from broiler breeder chicken flocks for 4 months of production. Cecal, bedding, and litter samples were populated by microbiota of distinct composition. The microbiota in the bedding material did not expand in the litter. Similarly, major species from litter microbiota did not expand in the cecum. Only cecal microbiota was found in the litter forming approximately 20% of total litter microbiota. A time-dependent development of litter microbiota was observed. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Weissella jogaejeotgali were characteristic of fresh litter during the first month of production. Corynebacterium casei, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus salivarius dominated in a 2-month-old litter, Brevibacterium, Brachybacterium, and Sphingobacterium were characteristic for 3-month-old litter, and Salinococcus, Dietzia, Yaniella, and Staphylococcus lentus were common in a 4-month-old litter. Although the development was likely determined by physicochemical conditions in the litter, it might be interesting to test some of these species for active modification of litter to improve the chicken environment and welfare. IMPORTANCE Despite intimate contact, the composition of bedding, litter, and cecal microbiota differs considerably. Species characteristic for litter microbiota at different time points of chicken production were identified thus opening the possibility for active manipulation of litter microbiota.

• Keywords
• antibiotic resistance, bedding, cecum, chicken, litter, microbiota,
• MeSH
• Cecum microbiology   MeSH
• Chickens * microbiology   MeSH
• Microbiota * genetics   MeSH
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics   MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• RNA, Ribosomal, 16S MeSH

The global turkey industry is confronted with emerging challenges regarding health and welfare. Performance and disease resilience are directly linked to gut health. A clear definition of a healthy gut is a prerequisite to developing new strategies for improved gut health and, thus, general health, welfare and productivity. To date, detailed knowledge about gut health characteristics, especially during the critical fattening period, is still lacking for turkeys. Therefore, the goal of this study was to describe the morphology, microbiota, and metabolome along the intestinal tract of clinically healthy Salmonella- and Campylobacter-free commercial turkey hens throughout the fattening period from 7 to 10 wk posthatch, and obtain information on the stability of the investigated values over time. Feed changes were avoided directly preceding and during the investigation period. Investigation methods included histomorphometric measurement of intestinal villi and crypts, Illumina-sequencing for microbiota analysis, and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for metabolite identification and quantification. Overall, the study demonstrated a high repeatability across all 3 experiments and gut section differences observed coincided with their functions. It was demonstrated that gut maturation, defined by gut microbiota stability, is reached earlier in the ceca than any other intestinal section where morphological changes are ongoing throughout the fattening period. Therefore, the present study provides valuable information necessary to advise future studies on the development and implementation of measures to support gut maturation and establish a protective microbiota in commercial turkeys.

• Keywords
• age, fattening, gut microbiota, intestinal metabolome, turkey,
• MeSH
• Turkeys MeSH
• Chickens MeSH
• Metabolome MeSH
• Microbiota * MeSH
• Gastrointestinal Microbiome * MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Female MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

The gut microbiota of warm-blooded vertebrates consists of bacterial species belonging to two main phyla; Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. However, does it mean that the same bacterial species are found in humans and chickens? Here we show that the ability to survive in an aerobic environment is central for host species adaptation. Known bacterial species commonly found in humans, pigs, chickens and Antarctic gentoo penguins are those capable of extended survival under aerobic conditions, i.e., either spore-forming, aerotolerant or facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Such bacteria are ubiquitously distributed in the environment, which acts as the source of infection with similar probability in humans, pigs, chickens, penguins and likely any other warm-blooded omnivorous hosts. On the other hand, gut anaerobes with no specific adaptation for survival in an aerobic environment exhibit host adaptation. This is associated with their vertical transmission from mothers to offspring and long-term colonisation after administration of a single dose. This knowledge influences the design of next-generation probiotics. The origin of aerotolerant or spore-forming probiotic strains may not be that important. On the other hand, if Bacteroidetes and other host-adapted species are used as future probiotics, host preference should be considered.

• Keywords
• chicken, endospore, environment, gut microbiota, host adaptation, human, penguin, pig, spread,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Lactobacilli are commonly used as probiotics in poultry to improve production parameters and to increase chicken resistance to enteric infections. However, lactobacilli do not efficiently colonise the chicken intestinal tract, and also, their anti-infection effect in vivo is sometimes questionable. In this study, we therefore evaluated the potential of a mixture of four Lactobacillus species (L. salivarius, L. reuteri, L. ingluviei and L. alvi) for the protection of chickens against Salmonella Enteritidis infection. Whenever the chickens were inoculated by lactobacilli and S. Enteritidis separately, there was no protective effect of lactobacilli. This means that when lactobacilli and S. Enteritidis are exposed to each other as late as in the crop of chickens, lactobacilli did not influence chicken resistance to S. Enteritidis at all. The only positive effect was recorded when the mixture of lactobacilli and S. Enteritidis was used for the inoculation of feed and the feed was anaerobically fermented for 1 to 5 days. In this case, chickens fed such a diet remained S. Enteritidis negative. In vitro experiments showed that the protective effect was caused by acidification of feed down to pH 4.6 due to lactobacilli fermentation and was associated with S. Enteritidis inactivation. The probiotic effect of lactobacilli was thus expressed in the feed, outside the chicken host.

• Keywords
• Lactobacillus, Salmonella Enteritidis, chicken, feed fermentation, gut microbiota, probiotic,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH