Most cited article - PubMed ID 34662536
Recommendations for good practice in MS-based lipidomics
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is becoming an increasingly prevalent issue, particularly among the elderly population. Lipids are closely associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) pathology. Lipidomics as a comprehensive profiling tool is showing to be promising in the prediction of events and mortality due to CVD as well as identifying novel biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, eicosanoids and lipid profiles were measured in order to predict survival in patients with de novo or acute decompensated HF. Our study included 50 patients (16 females, mean age 73 years and 34 males, mean age 71 years) with de novo or acute decompensated chronic HF with a median follow-up of 7 months. Lipids were semiquantified using targeted lipidomic liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Eicosanoid concentrations were determined using a commercially available sandwich ELISA assay. RESULTS: From 736 lipids and 3 eicosanoids, 39 significant lipids were selected (by using the Mann-Whitney U test after Benjamini-Hochberg correction) with the highest number of representatives belonging to the polyunsaturated (PUFA) phosphatidylcholines (PC). PC 42:10 (p = 1.44 × 10-4) was found to be the most statistically significantly elevated in the surviving group with receiver operating characteristics of AUC = 0.84 (p = 3.24 × 10-7). A multivariate supervised discriminant analysis based on the aforementioned lipid panel enabled the classification of the groups of surviving and non-surviving patients with 90 % accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study we describe a trend in PUFA esterified in PC that were systematically increased in surviving patients with HF. This trend in low-abundant and rarely identified PUFA PC (mainly very long chain PUFA containing PC such as PC 42:10 or PC 40:9 containing FA 22:6, FA 20:5 and FA 20:4) suggests candidate biomarkers.
- Keywords
- Atherosclerosis, Eicosanoids, HF survival, Heart failure, Lipidomics, PC, PUFA, Phosphatidylcholine, Survival rate,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In this community effort, we compare measurements between 34 laboratories from 19 countries, utilizing mixtures of labelled authentic synthetic standards, to quantify by mass spectrometry four clinically used ceramide species in the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) human blood plasma Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1950, as well as a set of candidate plasma reference materials (RM 8231). Participants either utilized a provided validated method and/or their method of choice. Mean concentration values, and intra- and inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated using single-point and multi-point calibrations, respectively. These results are the most precise (intra-laboratory CVs ≤ 4.2%) and concordant (inter-laboratory CVs < 14%) community-derived absolute concentration values reported to date for four clinically used ceramides in the commonly analyzed SRM 1950. We demonstrate that calibration using authentic labelled standards dramatically reduces data variability. Furthermore, we show how the use of shared RM can correct systematic quantitative biases and help in harmonizing lipidomics. Collectively, the results from the present study provide a significant knowledge base for translation of lipidomic technologies to future clinical applications that might require the determination of reference intervals (RIs) in various human populations or might need to estimate reference change values (RCV), when analytical variability is a key factor for recall during multiple testing of individuals.
- MeSH
- Ceramides * blood MeSH
- Mass Spectrometry methods MeSH
- Calibration MeSH
- Laboratories * standards MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lipidomics methods MeSH
- Reference Standards * MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Ceramides * MeSH
The rapid increase in lipidomic studies has led to a collaborative effort within the community to establish standards and criteria for producing, documenting, and disseminating data. Creating a dynamic easy-to-use checklist that condenses key information about lipidomic experiments into common terminology will enhance the field's consistency, comparability, and repeatability. Here, we describe the structure and rationale of the established Lipidomics Minimal Reporting Checklist to increase transparency in lipidomics research.
- Keywords
- FAIR, checklist, lipid metabolism, lipidomics, mass spectrometry, metabolomics, quality control, reference standards,
- MeSH
- Checklist * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lipidomics * methods standards MeSH
- Lipids analysis chemistry MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Lipids MeSH
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the key technique for analyzing complex lipids in biological samples. Various LC-MS modes are used for lipid separation, including different stationary phases, mobile-phase solvents, and modifiers. Quality control in lipidomics analysis is crucial to ensuring the generated data's reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy. While several quality control measures are commonly discussed, the impact of organic solvent quality during LC-MS analysis is often overlooked. Additionally, the annotation of complex lipids remains prone to biases, leading to potential misidentifications and incomplete characterization of lipid species. In this study, we investigate how LC-MS-grade isopropanol from different vendors may influence the quality of the mobile phase used in LC-MS-based untargeted lipidomic profiling of biological samples. Furthermore, we report the occurrence of an unusual, yet highly abundant, ethylamine adduct [M+46.0651]+ that may form for specific lipid subclasses during LC-MS analysis in positive electrospray ionization mode when acetonitrile is part of the mobile phase, potentially leading to lipid misidentification. These findings emphasize the importance of considering solvent quality in LC-MS analysis and highlight challenges in lipid annotation.
- Keywords
- MS/MS annotation, adduct formation, lipidomics, lipids, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, metabolomics, method development, misidentification, solvent quality,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
