• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné
[Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial]

Zeymer U, et al.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc10036361

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI. METHODS: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete (> or =70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%. RESULTS: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10036361
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210200847.0
008      
110111s2010 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Zeymer, Uwe
245    10
$a Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné / $c Zeymer U, et al.
246    11
$a Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial
314    __
$a Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstrasse 79, Ludwigshafen, Germany uwe.zeymer@t-online.de
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI. METHODS: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete (> or =70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%. RESULTS: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a balónková koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D015906
650    _2
$a monoklonální protilátky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000911
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunoglobuliny - Fab fragmenty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007140
650    _2
$a intravenózní infuze $7 D007262
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D009203
650    _2
$a peptidy $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010455
650    _2
$a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010975
650    _2
$a trombocytový glykoproteinový komplex IIb-IIIa $x antagonisté a inhibitory $7 D019039
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 4, č. 6 (2010), s. 42 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc10036363 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 7
990    __
$a 20110106080203 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110128161303 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 825173 $s 690283
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 4 $c 6 $d 42 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
LZP    __
$a 2011-01/mkme

Najít záznam