-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné
[Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial]
Zeymer U, et al.
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, multicentrická studie
- MeSH
- balónková koronární angioplastika metody MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- imunoglobuliny - Fab fragmenty aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- infarkt myokardu diagnóza patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- inhibitory agregace trombocytů aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- intravenózní infuze MeSH
- koronární angiografie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- peptidy aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- trombocytový glykoproteinový komplex IIb-IIIa antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI. METHODS: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete (> or =70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%. RESULTS: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10036361
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210200847.0
- 008
- 110111s2010 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Zeymer, Uwe
- 245 10
- $a Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné / $c Zeymer U, et al.
- 246 11
- $a Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial
- 314 __
- $a Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstrasse 79, Ludwigshafen, Germany uwe.zeymer@t-online.de
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI. METHODS: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete (> or =70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%. RESULTS: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 650 _2
- $a balónková koronární angioplastika $x metody $7 D015906
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobuliny - Fab fragmenty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007140
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní infuze $7 D007262
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a infarkt myokardu $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D009203
- 650 _2
- $a peptidy $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010455
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory agregace trombocytů $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D010975
- 650 _2
- $a trombocytový glykoproteinový komplex IIb-IIIa $x antagonisté a inhibitory $7 D019039
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 4, č. 6 (2010), s. 42 $x 1213-2586
- 787 18
- $w bmc10036363 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Eptifibatid a abciximab jsou při primární PCI stejně účinné]
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20110106080203 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20110128161303 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 825173 $s 690283
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 4 $c 6 $d 42 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
- LZP __
- $a 2011-01/mkme