Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Infliximab Biosimilar (Remsima™) in Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients: Experience from One Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Centre

M. Kolar, D. Duricova, M. Bortlik, V. Hruba, N. Machkova, K. Mitrova, K. Malickova, M. Lukas, M. Lukas,

. 2017 ; 35 (1-2) : 91-100. [pub] 20170201

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17013280

BACKGROUND: The evidence on the efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is sparse. METHODS: Consecutive IBD patients visiting our centre were included. One cohort composed of prospectively followed patients who were switched from original to biosimilar IFX between January and March 2015. The second cohort included retrospectively assessed anti-tumor necrosis factor α-naïve patients who started therapy between January 2015 and January 2016. Disease activity was assessed using standard clinical indices, endoscopic evaluation, and laboratory parameters (blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC)). Trough levels and anti-drug antibodies (ATIs) were also measured. Patients were evaluated 56 weeks (W56) after switch and at week 14 (W14) and week 46 (W46) in the naïve cohort. RESULTS: Seventy-four IBD patients were switched to biosimilar IFX and 119 naïve patients newly initiated therapy with the preparation. Disease activity remained stable in a majority of switched patients (remission at week 0 (W0) vs. W56: 72.2 vs. 77.8%; median difference of both Harvey-Bradshaw index and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index between W0 and W56 was 0). When W0 and W56 were compared, no significant difference in CRP (4.3 ± 8.0 vs. 3.3 ± 3.8 mg/l; p = 0.89) and FC (135 ± 153 vs. 199 ± 225 µg/g; p = 0.17) was observed. In total, 92% of Crohn's disease (CD) and 83% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients responded to induction therapy (W14) with biosimilar IFX. At W46, the response rate was 86% in CD and 64% in UC. Moreover, half of UC patients experienced mucosal healing at W14 and improvement of perianal disease occurred in 95% of CD at W46. In this cohort, clear steroid-sparing effect was observed. No increase in immunogenicity was found in switched patients (ATI positivity: 9.5 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.54) and the type and frequency of adverse events were comparable to the original preparation in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Switching of IBD patients from original to biosimilar IFX is effective and safe.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17013280
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170428121531.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2017 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1159/000453343 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28147356
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kolar, M $u IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Infliximab Biosimilar (Remsima™) in Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients: Experience from One Tertiary Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Centre / $c M. Kolar, D. Duricova, M. Bortlik, V. Hruba, N. Machkova, K. Mitrova, K. Malickova, M. Lukas, M. Lukas,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The evidence on the efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is sparse. METHODS: Consecutive IBD patients visiting our centre were included. One cohort composed of prospectively followed patients who were switched from original to biosimilar IFX between January and March 2015. The second cohort included retrospectively assessed anti-tumor necrosis factor α-naïve patients who started therapy between January 2015 and January 2016. Disease activity was assessed using standard clinical indices, endoscopic evaluation, and laboratory parameters (blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC)). Trough levels and anti-drug antibodies (ATIs) were also measured. Patients were evaluated 56 weeks (W56) after switch and at week 14 (W14) and week 46 (W46) in the naïve cohort. RESULTS: Seventy-four IBD patients were switched to biosimilar IFX and 119 naïve patients newly initiated therapy with the preparation. Disease activity remained stable in a majority of switched patients (remission at week 0 (W0) vs. W56: 72.2 vs. 77.8%; median difference of both Harvey-Bradshaw index and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index between W0 and W56 was 0). When W0 and W56 were compared, no significant difference in CRP (4.3 ± 8.0 vs. 3.3 ± 3.8 mg/l; p = 0.89) and FC (135 ± 153 vs. 199 ± 225 µg/g; p = 0.17) was observed. In total, 92% of Crohn's disease (CD) and 83% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients responded to induction therapy (W14) with biosimilar IFX. At W46, the response rate was 86% in CD and 64% in UC. Moreover, half of UC patients experienced mucosal healing at W14 and improvement of perianal disease occurred in 95% of CD at W46. In this cohort, clear steroid-sparing effect was observed. No increase in immunogenicity was found in switched patients (ATI positivity: 9.5 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.54) and the type and frequency of adverse events were comparable to the original preparation in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Switching of IBD patients from original to biosimilar IFX is effective and safe.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
650    _2
$a biosimilární léčivé přípravky $x terapeutické užití $7 D059451
650    _2
$a C-reaktivní protein $x analýza $7 D002097
650    _2
$a ulcerózní kolitida $x terapie $7 D003093
650    _2
$a Crohnova nemoc $x terapie $7 D003424
650    12
$a náhrada léků $7 D057915
650    _2
$a feces $x chemie $7 D005243
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gastrointestinální látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D005765
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a idiopatické střevní záněty $x terapie $7 D015212
650    _2
$a infliximab $x terapeutické užití $7 D000069285
650    _2
$a střevní sliznice $x účinky léků $7 D007413
650    _2
$a leukocytární L1-antigenní komplex $x analýza $7 D039841
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a indukce remise $7 D012074
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Duricova, D
700    1_
$a Bortlik, M
700    1_
$a Hruba, V
700    1_
$a Machkova, N
700    1_
$a Mitrova, K
700    1_
$a Malickova, K
700    1_
$a Lukas, M
700    1_
$a Lukas, Milan
773    0_
$w MED00173707 $t Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) $x 1421-9875 $g Roč. 35, č. 1-2 (2017), s. 91-100
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28147356 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170428121852 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1199745 $s 974058
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 35 $c 1-2 $d 91-100 $e 20170201 $i 1421-9875 $m Digestive diseases $n Dig Dis $x MED00173707
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...