Differential effect of Bacillus firmus on immune response and enterocyte brush-border enzyme levels in BALB/c and B10.BR mice

. 2002 ; 47 (6) : 759-65.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid12630333

A nonpathogenic bacterium of external environment possessing remarkable immunomodulatory activity, Bacillus firmus (BF) inactivated with formaldehyde, was given intragastrically to two genetically different mouse strains BALB/c (H-2d) and B10.BR/SnPh (B10.BR, H-2k) reared in conventional (CV) and B10.BR strain also in germ-free (GF) conditions. Repeated intragastric administration of BF (500 micrograms every other day over two weeks, starting at the age of 3 months) significantly enhanced intestinal IgA levels in CV BALB/c mice but did not affect intestinal IgA in CV B10.BR mice. In GF B10.BR mice, IgG levels in sera and intestinal washings increased after BF administration compared to CV B10.BR mice. In CV BALB/c mice, specific activity of enterocyte brush-border enzymes (lactase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase) decreased after BF treatment; sucrase (sucrose alpha-glucosidase) activity was not affected. On the other hand, in B10.BR mice, specific activity of gamma-glutamyltransferase and dipeptidyl peptidase IV were higher after administration of BF in both CV and GF groups relative to untreated controls. The activities of lactase and glucoamylase (glucan 1,4-alpha-glucosidase) were significantly stimulated only in the group of GF B10.BR mice treated with formolized BF. The stimulation of immunoglobulin production after BF treatment was accompanied by changes in the levels of enterocyte brush-border enzymes; this responsiveness to BF treatment was genetically regulated.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Infect Immun. 2001 Apr;69(4):2372-7 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Sep 19;284(1):235-47 PubMed

Anal Biochem. 1976 Aug;74(2):466-76 PubMed

Semin Immunol. 1996 Feb;8(1):11-8 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1997;42(4):403-8 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2001 Jul;87(7):570-2 PubMed

J Immunol. 1999 May 1;162(9):5112-8 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1994;39(2):147-51 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1995 Oct;63(10):3904-13 PubMed

Anal Biochem. 1964 Jan;7:18-25 PubMed

J Reprod Immunol. 1989 Jul;15(3):217-27 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):193-7 PubMed

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Jul 12;71(1):32-6 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Jan 4;506(1):136-54 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Feb 28;258(2):520-30 PubMed

Int J Immunopharmacol. 1994 May-Jun;16(5-6):487-93 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1995;40(4):413-6 PubMed

Gastroenterology. 1994 Feb;106(2):533-9 PubMed

Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):2-5 PubMed

Int J Immunopharmacol. 1998 Jul;20(7):359-68 PubMed

Springer Semin Immunopathol. 1997;18(4):449-61 PubMed

Endocrine. 1997 Apr;6(2):187-94 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1996 Jan 12;271(2):1237-42 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1992;37(6):455-60 PubMed

J Immunol. 1985 Nov;135(5):3277-83 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1994;39(6):501-4 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 5;268(19):14116-24 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1995;40(6):647-51 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace