OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of statistical SPECT processing over traditional subtraction methods, we compared ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (ISAS), statistical ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (STATISCOM), and subtraction ictal-interictal SPECT coregistered with MRI (SISCOM) in patients with MRI-negative focal temporal lobe epilepsy (nTLE) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (nETLE). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 49 consecutive cases of drug-resistant focal epilepsy that had a negative preoperative MRI and underwent interictal and ictal SPECT prior to resective epilepsy surgery. Interictal and ictal SPECT scans were analyzed using SISCOM, ISAS, and STATISCOM to create hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion maps for each patient. Reviewers blinded to clinical data and the SPECT analysis method marked the site of probable seizure origin and indicated their confidence in the localization. RESULTS: In nTLE and nETLE, the hyperperfusions detected by STATISCOM (71% nTLE, 57% nETLE) and ISAS (67% nTLE, 53% nETLE) were more often colocalized with surgery resection site compared to SISCOM (38% nTLE, 36% nETLE). In nTLE, localization of the hyperperfusion to the region of surgery was associated with an excellent outcome for STATISCOM (p = 0.005) and ISAS (p = 0.027), but not in SISCOM (p = 0.071). This association was not present in nETLE for any method. CONCLUSION: In an unselected group of patients with normal MRI and focal epilepsy, SPM-based methods of SPECT processing showed better localization of SPECT hyperperfusion to surgical resection site and higher interobserver agreement compared to SISCOM. These results show the benefit of statistical SPECT processing methods and further highlight the challenge of nETLE.

From the Departments of Neurology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Neurology. 2014 Mar 18;82(11):910-1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000225. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sylaja PN, Radhakrishnan K, Kesavadas C, Sarma PS. Seizure outcome after anterior temporal lobectomy and its predictors in patients with apparent temporal lobe epilepsy and normal MRI. Epilepsia 2004;45:803–808 PubMed

Jayakar P, Dunoyer C, Dean P, et al. Epilepsy surgery in patients with normal or nonfocal MRI scans: integrative strategies offer long-term seizure relief. Epilepsia 2008;49:758–764 PubMed

Holmes M, Born D. Outcome after surgery in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy and normal MRI. Seizure 2000;9:407–411 PubMed

Radhakrishnan K, So EL, Silbert PL, et al. Predictors of outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy. Neurology 1998;51:465–471 PubMed

Siegel AM, Jobst BC, Thadani VM, et al. Medically intractable, localization-related epilepsy with normal MRI: presurgical evaluation and surgical outcome in 43 patients. Epilepsia 2001;42:883–888 PubMed

Chapman K, Wyllie E, Najm I, et al. Seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with normal preoperative MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:710–713 PubMed PMC

Lee SK, Lee SY, Kim KK, Hong KS, Lee DS, Chung CK. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of cryptogenic neocortical epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2005;58:525–532 PubMed

Bell ML, Rao S, So EL, et al. Epilepsy surgery outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy with a normal MRI. Epilepsia 2009;50:2053–2060 PubMed PMC

Jeha LE, Najm I, Bingaman W, Dinner D, Widdess-Walsh P, Lüders H. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Brain 2007;130:574–584 PubMed

Noe KH, Sulc V, Wong-Kisiel L, et al. Long term outcomes in nonlesional extratemporal lobe epilepsy surgery. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:1003–1008 PubMed PMC

O’Brien TJ, So EL, Mullan BP, et al. Subtraction peri-ictal SPECT is predictive of extratemporal epilepsy surgery outcome. Neurology 2000;55:1668–1677 PubMed

Cascino GD, Buchhalter JR, Mullan BP, So EL. Ictal SPECT in nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2004;45(suppl 4):32–34 PubMed

Tan KM, Britton JW, Buchhalter JR, et al. Influence of subtraction ictal SPECT on surgical management in focal epilepsy of indeterminate localization: a prospective study. Epilepsy Res 2008;82:190–193 PubMed

Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1994;2:189–210

Brinkmann BH, O'Brien TJ, Webster DB, Mullan BP, Robins PD, Robb RA. Voxel significance mapping using local image variances in subtraction ictal SPET. Nucl Med Commun 2000;21:545–551 PubMed

Chang DJ, Zubal IG, Gottschalk C, et al. Comparison of statistical parametric mapping and SPECT difference imaging in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2002;43:68–74 PubMed

McNally KA, Paige AL, Varghese G, et al. Localizing value of ictal-interictal SPECT analyzed by SPM (ISAS). Epilepsia 2005;46:1450–1464 PubMed

Kazemi NJ, Worrell GA, Stead SM, et al. Ictal SPECT statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Neurology 2010;74:70–76 PubMed PMC

O'Brien TJ, So EL, Mullan BP, et al. Subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI improves clinical usefulness of SPECT in localizing the surgical seizure focus. Neurology 1998;50:445–454 PubMed

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174 PubMed

Krsek P, Kudr M, Jahodova A, et al. Localizing value of ictal SPECT is comparable to MRI and EEG in children with focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2013;54:351–358 PubMed

Knowlton RC, Elgavish RA, Bartolucci A, et al. Functional imaging: II: prediction of epilepsy surgery outcome. Ann Neurol 2008;64:35–41 PubMed

Lee JD, Kim HJ, Lee BI, Kim OJ, Jeon TJ, Kim MJ. Evaluation of ictal brain SPET using statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2000;27:1658–1665 PubMed

Newton MR, Berkovic SF, Austin MC, Rowe CC, McKay WJ, Bladin PF. Postictal switch in blood flow distribution and temporal lobe seizures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:891–894 PubMed PMC

Zubal IG, Spencer SS, Imam K, et al. Difference images calculated from ictal and interictal technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT scans of epilepsy. J Nucl Med 1995;36:684–689 PubMed

Knowlton RC, Elgavish RA, Limdi N, et al. Functional imaging: I: relative predictive value of intracranial electroencephalography. Ann Neurol 2008;64:25–34 PubMed

Weil S, Noachtar S, Arnold S. Ictal ECD-SPECT differentiates between temporal and extratemporal epilepsy: confirmation by excellent postoperative seizure control. Nucl Med 2001;22:233–237 PubMed

Won HJ, Chang KH, Cheon JE, et al. Comparison of MR imaging with PET and ictal SPECT in 118 patients with intractable epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:593–599 PubMed PMC

Hwang SI, Kim JH, Park SW, et al. Comparative analysis of MR imaging, positron emission tomography, and ictal single-photon emission CT in patients with neocortical epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:937–946 PubMed PMC

Meyer PT, Cortés-Blanco A, Pourdehnad M, et al. Inter-modality comparisons of seizure focus lateralization in complex partial seizures. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:1529–1540 PubMed

Spencer SS. The relative contributions of MRI, SPECT, and PET imaging in epilepsy. Epilepsia 1994;35(suppl 6):S72–S89 PubMed

Scheinost D, Teisseyre TZ, Distasio M, DeSalvo MN, Papademetris X, Blumenfeld H. New open-source ictal SPECT analysis method implemented in BioImage Suite. Epilepsia 2010;51:703–707 PubMed PMC

Newey CR, Wong C, Wang ZI, Chen X, Wu G, Alexopoulos AV. Optimizing SPECT SISCOM analysis to localize seizure-onset zone by using varying z scores. Epilepsia 2013;54:793–800 PubMed

Multimodal combination of neuroimaging methods for localizing the epileptogenic zone in MR-negative epilepsy

Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging