A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ganitumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: the GAMMA trial

. 2015 May ; 26 (5) : 921-927. [epub] 20150121

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25609246

Grantová podpora
R01 CA124908 NCI NIH HHS - United States

Odkazy

PubMed 25609246
PubMed Central PMC4804122
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdv027
PII: S0923-7534(19)31492-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: This double-blind, phase 3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ganitumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2 : 2 : 1 to receive intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) plus placebo, ganitumab 12 mg/kg, or ganitumab 20 mg/kg (days 1 and 15 of each cycle). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and efficacy by levels of circulating biomarkers. RESULTS: Overall, 322 patients were randomly assigned to placebo, 318 to ganitumab 12 mg/kg, and 160 to ganitumab 20 mg/kg. The study was stopped based on results from a preplanned futility analysis; the final results are reported. Median OS was 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.3-8.2] in the placebo arm, 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.5) in the ganitumab 12-mg/kg arm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.21; P = 0.494], and 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-8.5) in the ganitumab 20-mg/kg arm (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.23; P = 0.397). Median PFS was 3.7, 3.6 (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20; P = 0.520), and 3.7 months (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; P = 0.403), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed with ganitumab plus gemcitabine. The circulating biomarkers assessed [insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), IGF-binding protein-2, and -3] were not associated with a treatment effect on OS or PFS by ganitumab. CONCLUSION: Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had manageable toxicity but did not improve OS, compared with gemcitabine alone in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01231347.

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy Russian Cancer Research Center Moscow Russia

Department of Gastroenterology Erasme University Hospital Brussels Belgium

Department of Gastroenterology Kanagawa Cancer Center Yokohama Japan

Department of Haematology Oncology and Internal Medicine Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Department of Hematology Oncology and Tumor Immunology Charité University Berlin Germany

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa Japan

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

Department of Medical Oncology Solid Tumor Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston USA

Department of Oncology Antwerp University Hospital Edegum Belgium

Department of Oncology Masaryk University Medical School and Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic

Department of Oncology Military Institute of Health Services Warsaw Poland

Department of Oncology Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital Olomouc

Department of Oncology St László Hospital Budapest Hungary

Development Oncology Therapeutics Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks USA

Digestive Oncology University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Global Biostatistical Science Amgen Ltd Cambridge UK

Global Development Thousand Oaks

Medical Oncology Department University Hospital Ramon y Cajal Madrid Spain

Medical Oncology Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville VIC Australia

Medical Sciences Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks USA

Oncology Service Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada

Zobrazit více v PubMed

SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas Cancer. National Cancer Institute; http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html (3 March 2014, date last accessed).

Baxter NN, Whitson BA, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment and outcome of pancreatic cancer in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 1320–1326. PubMed

Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, et al. Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3402–3408. PubMed

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma v.1.2014. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2014.

Seufferlein T, Bachet JB, Van Cutsem E, Rouqier P, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: ESMO-ESDO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(Suppl 7): vii33–vii40. PubMed

Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1691–1703. PubMed PMC

Abraxane

Arnaldez FI, Helman LJ. Targeting the insulin growth factor receptor 1. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2012; 26: 527–542, vii–viii. PubMed PMC

Bergmann U, Funatomi H, Yokoyama M, Beger HG, Korc M. Insulin-like growth factor I overexpression in human pancreatic cancer: evidence for autocrine and paracrine roles. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 2007–2011. PubMed

Hakam A, Fang Q, Karl R, Coppola D. Coexpression of IGF-1R and c-Src proteins in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2003; 48: 1972–1978. PubMed

Beltran PJ, Mitchell P, Chung YA, et al. AMG 479, a fully human anti-insulin-like growth factor receptor type I monoclonal antibody, inhibits the growth and survival of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2009; 8: 1095–1105. PubMed

Kindler HL, Richards DA, Garbo LE, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab (AMG 479) or conatumumab (AMG 655) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2834–2842. PubMed

Lu J, Deng H, Tang R, et al. Exposure-response (E-R) analysis to facilitate phase III (P3) dose selection for ganitumab (GAN, AMG 479) in combination with gemcitabine (G) to treat metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: abstr 4049.

Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205–216. PubMed

Tolcher AW, Sarantopoulos J, Patnaik A, et al. Phase I, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of AMG 479, a fully human monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor receptor 1. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5800–5807. PubMed

McCaffery I, Tudor Y, Deng H, et al. Putative predictive biomarkers of survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with gemcitabine and ganitumab, an IGF1R inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 4282–4289. PubMed

Furuse J. Pancreatic cancer: is combination treatment better? Clin Pract 2013; 10: 695–700.

Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1817–1825. PubMed

Hixon ML, Gualberto A, Demers L, et al. Correlation of plasma levels of free insulin-like growth factor 1 and clinical benefit of the IGF-IR inhibitor figitumumab (CP-751, 871). J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: abstr 3539.

Van Cutsem E, Vervenne WL, Bennouna J, et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2231–2237. PubMed

Lambrechts D, Claes B, Delmar P, et al. VEGF pathway genetic variants as biomarkers of treatment outcome with bevacizumab: an analysis of data from the AViTA and AVOREN randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 724–733. PubMed

Pollak M. The insulin receptor/insulin-like growth factor receptor family as a therapeutic target in oncology. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 40–50. PubMed

Hezel AF, Kimmelman AC, Stanger BZ, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev 2006; 20: 1218–1249. PubMed

Almoguera C, Shibata D, Forrester K, et al. Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes. Cell 1988; 53: 549–554. PubMed

Appleman VA, Ahronian LG, Cai J, Klimstra DS, Lewis BC. KRAS(G12D)- and BRAF(V600E)-induced transformation of murine pancreatic epithelial cells requires MEK/ERK-stimulated IGF1R signaling. Mol Cancer Res 2012; 10: 1228–1239. PubMed PMC

Yee D. Insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibitors: baby or the bathwater? J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 975–981. PubMed PMC

Atzori F, Tabernero J, Cervantes A, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of dalotuzumab (MK-0646), an anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 6304–6312. PubMed

Cohn AL, Tabernero J, Maurel J, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 1777–1785. PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01231347

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...