Toward the processing speed theory of activities of daily living in healthy aging: normative data of the Functional Activities Questionnaire
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26231091
DOI
10.1007/s40520-015-0413-5
PII: 10.1007/s40520-015-0413-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Activities of daily living, Instrumental activities of daily living, Normal aging, Normative data, Questionnaire,
- MeSH
- činnosti denního života MeSH
- deprese MeSH
- epizodická paměť MeSH
- exekutivní funkce * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- motorické dovednosti * MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychomotorický výkon * MeSH
- referenční hodnoty MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stárnutí * fyziologie psychologie MeSH
- stupeň vzdělání MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- zraková percepce * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe an instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) measure: Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), which is often used in clinical settings as a self- or informant-based measure of IADL. However, the FAQ's relationship with age or education in healthy aging has not been investigated. METHODS: FAQ and a neuropsychological battery were administered to old and very old Czech adults (n = 540). Participants met strict inclusion criteria for the absence of any active or past neurodegenerative disorders. RESULTS: FAQ is significantly dependent on age and education, but not gender. Younger subjects and those with higher education have the lowest scores in the FAQ and show a higher degree of functional independence. FAQ moderately correlates with speed of processing, visual-perceptual and executive functions measures (Trail Making Tests, Stroop Test) and depressive symptoms, but not with episodic memory (WMS-III logical memory). We present normative percentile values for different age groups from 60 to 96 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows conclusively that IADL measures, such as FAQ, should not be used without appropriate normative data, especially in very old adults. Thus, it has the ability to differentiate functional dependence due to age-related decline from neurodegenerative disease.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Processing speed predicts SuperAging years later
