Development of fast and robust multiresidual LC-MS/MS method for determination of pharmaceuticals in soils
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie
PubMed
27044290
DOI
10.1007/s11356-016-6487-6
PII: 10.1007/s11356-016-6487-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Extraction efficiency, Extraction method, Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, Matrix effects, Sediments, Sludge, Validation,
- MeSH
- 2-propanol MeSH
- acetonitrily MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová metody MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu analýza MeSH
- léčivé přípravky analýza MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- odpadní vody chemie MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 2-propanol MeSH
- acetonitrile MeSH Prohlížeč
- acetonitrily MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu MeSH
- léčivé přípravky MeSH
- odpadní vody MeSH
- půda MeSH
The aim of this study was to develop a simple extraction procedure and a multiresidual liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of a wide range of pharmaceuticals from various soil types. An extraction procedure for 91 pharmaceuticals from 13 soil types, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis, was optimized. The extraction efficiencies of three solvent mixtures for ultrasonic extraction were evaluated for 91 pharmaceuticals. The best results were obtained using acetonitrile/water (1/1 v/v with 0.1 % formic acid) followed by acetonitrile/2-propanol/water (3/3/4 v/v/v with 0.1 % formic acid) for extracting 63 pharmaceuticals. The method was validated at three fortification levels (10, 100, and 1000 ng/g) in all types of representative soils; recovery of 44 pharmaceuticals ranged between 55 and 135 % across all tested soils. The method was applied to analyze actual environmental samples of sediments, soils, and sludge, and 24 pharmaceuticals were found above limit of quantification with concentrations ranging between 0.83 ng/g (fexofenadine) and 223 ng/g (citalopram).
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012 Jul;66:24-32 PubMed
J Chromatogr A. 2002 Apr 5;952(1-2):139-47 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 15;544:369-81 PubMed
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Mar 20;121:271-296 PubMed
J Chromatogr A. 2005 Mar 4;1067(1-2):1-14 PubMed
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001 May;40(4):451-60 PubMed
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Apr 1;511:435-43 PubMed
Environ Res. 2015 Apr;138:326-44 PubMed
J Environ Monit. 2008 Mar;10(3):353-61 PubMed
Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Apr 18;589(1):125-32 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2014 Sep;111:418-26 PubMed
Talanta. 2012 Oct 15;100:183-95 PubMed
J Chromatogr A. 2004 Jun 4;1038(1-2):157-70 PubMed
Water Res. 2015 Apr 1;72:145-53 PubMed
J Chromatogr A. 2012 Jul 6;1245:122-33 PubMed
Water Res. 2014 Jul 1;58:221-9 PubMed
Water Res. 2011 Oct 1;45(15):4470-82 PubMed
Environ Int. 2009 Jul;35(5):815-20 PubMed
Talanta. 2002 Nov 12;58(5):1003-10 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2007 Jan;66(5):894-904 PubMed
Talanta. 2009 Nov 15;80(1):363-71 PubMed
Combined effects of insecticide exposure and predation risk on freshwater detritivores