• This record comes from PubMed

Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile ribotype 001 associated with severe course of the infection and previous fluoroquinolone use in the Czech Republic, 2015

. 2017 Nov ; 36 (11) : 2251-2258. [epub] 20170705

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 28681203
DOI 10.1007/s10096-017-3055-z
PII: 10.1007/s10096-017-3055-z
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The aim of the study was to provide an update on the epidemiology of C. difficile infection (CDI) in a representative number of hospitals within the Czech Republic in 2015. In 2015, twenty-eight Czech hospitals were invited to participate in a CDI study. Laboratories sent the first 20 consecutive C. difficile isolates for characterization by capillary-electrophoresis (CE) ribotyping and the presence of toxin genes and collected patient data on previous hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, the number of CDI episodes and the course of CDI. The mean incidence of CDI was 5.2 [95% CI 4.2-6.2] cases per 10,000 patient-bed days in 27 hospitals in 2015. Of 490 C. difficile isolates, the prevalent PCR ribotypes (RTs) were 001 (n = 164, 33.5%) and 176 (n = 125, 25.5%) followed by 014 (n = 37, 7.6%), 012 (n = 17, 3.5%), 020 (n = 16, 3.3%), 017 (n = 14, 2.9%) and 002 (n = 11, 2.2%). A severe course of CDI was reported in 104 cases (21.2%) with significant association with RT001 infection (p = 0.03). CDI recurrence was 10.8% (n = 53). The previous use of fluoroquinolones was associated with RTs 001 and 176 CDIs (p = 0.046 and p = 0.041). We observed a persistence of RTs 001 and 176 CDIs in the Czech Republic that was associated with the previous use of fluoroquinolones. This highlights the need for a reduction in fluoroquinolone use in Czech hospital settings.

See more in PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Nov;13(11):1048-57 PubMed

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015 Dec 23;14:55 PubMed

J Med Microbiol. 2016 Oct;65(10 ):1158-1163 PubMed

Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29): PubMed

Euro Surveill. 2015;20(38):null PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Oct;9(10):989-96 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2014 Nov;59(6):523-6 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81 PubMed

Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Oct;12(7):1577-85 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Mar;21(3):248.e9-248.e16 PubMed

Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;13(11):936-45 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Feb;37(2):461-3 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Mar;20 Suppl 2:1-26 PubMed

J Med Microbiol. 2008 Nov;57(Pt 11):1377-82 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2015 Dec;36:88-90 PubMed

Lancet. 2011 Jan 1;377(9759):63-73 PubMed

Euro Surveill. 2009 Nov 12;14(45):null PubMed

Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2014 Jun;20(2):56-66 PubMed

Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2015 Jun;64(2):92-7 PubMed

Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29): PubMed

Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29): PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Nov;14(11):1057-64 PubMed

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jan;72 (1):1-18 PubMed

Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;14(12):1208-19 PubMed

Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17 (4):411-421 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2016 Dec;42:142-144 PubMed

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0118150 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:35-40 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...