Ventricular dyssynchrony assessment using ultra-high frequency ECG technique
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
28695377
PubMed Central
PMC5543201
DOI
10.1007/s10840-017-0268-0
PII: 10.1007/s10840-017-0268-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Depolarization, High-frequency electrocardiography, Left bundle branch block, Ventricular dyssynchrony,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional methods MeSH
- Electrocardiography methods MeSH
- Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Ventricular Remodeling physiology MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy methods MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Sampling Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to introduce new high-dynamic ECG technique with potential to detect temporal-spatial distribution of ventricular electrical depolarization and to assess the level of ventricular dyssynchrony. METHODS: 5-kHz 12-lead ECG data was collected. The amplitude envelopes of the QRS were computed in an ultra-high frequency band of 500-1000 Hz and were averaged (UHFQRS). UHFQRS V lead maps were compiled, and numerical descriptor identifying ventricular dyssynchrony (UHFDYS) was detected. RESULTS: An electrical UHFQRS maps describe the ventricular dyssynchrony distribution in resolution of milliseconds and correlate with strain rate results obtained by speckle tracking echocardiography. The effect of biventricular stimulation is demonstrated by the UHFQRS morphology and by the UHFDYS descriptor in selected examples. CONCLUSIONS: UHFQRS offers a new and simple technique for assessing electrical activation patterns in ventricular dyssynchrony with a temporal-spatial resolution that cannot be obtained by processing standard surface ECG. The main clinical potential of UHFQRS lies in the identification of differences in electrical activation among CRT candidates and detection of improvements in electrical synchrony in patients with biventricular pacing.
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:927–934. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010. PubMed DOI
Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, Gettes S. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:976–981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.013. PubMed DOI
Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, Bax JJ, Borer JS, Brugada J, Dickstein K, Ford I, Gorscan J, Gras D, Krum H, Sogaard P, Holzmeister J. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1395–1405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306687. PubMed DOI
Vernooy K, van Deursen CJ, Strik M, Prinzen FW. Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:481–493. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.67. PubMed DOI
Lumens J, Leenders GE, Cramer MJ, De Boeck BW, Doevendans PA, Prinzen FW, Delhaas T. Mechanistic evaluation of echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices: patient data combined with multiscale computer simulations. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:491–499. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973446. PubMed DOI
Asirvatham SJ. Cardiac resynchronization: is electrical synchrony relevant? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(10):1028–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00932.x. PubMed DOI
Muto C, Solimene F, Gallo P, Nastasi M, La Rosa C, Calvanese R, Iengo R, Canciello M, Sangiuolo R, Diemberger I, Ciardiello C, Tuccillo B. A randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in ischemic cardiomyopathy with narrow QRS The NARROW-CRT Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:538–545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000135. PubMed DOI
Risum N, Tayal B, Hansen TF. Identification of Typical Left Bundle Branch Block Contraction by Strain Echocardiography Is Additive to Electrocardiography in Prediction of Long-Term Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(6):631–641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.020. PubMed DOI
Schlegel TT, Kulecz WB, DePalma JL, Feiveson AH, Wilson JS, Rahman MA, Bungo MW. Real-time 12-lead high-frequency QRS electrocardiography for enhanced detection of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:339–350. doi: 10.4065/79.3.339. PubMed DOI
Goldberger AL, Bhargava V, Froelicher V, Covell J. Effect of myocardial infarction on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circulation. 1981;64:34–42. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.64.1.34. PubMed DOI
Pettersson J, Pahlm O, Carro E, Edenbrandt L, Ringborn M, Sörnmo L, Warren SG, Wagner GS. Changes in high-frequency QRS components are more sensitive than ST-segment deviation for detecting acute coronary artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1827–1834. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00936-0. PubMed DOI
Amit G, Granot Y, Abboud S. Quantifying QRS changes during myocardial ischemia: insights from high frequency electrocardiography. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47(4):505–511. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.03.006. PubMed DOI
Abboud S. High-frequency QRS electrocardiogram for diagnosing and monitoring ischemic heart disease. J Electrocardiol. 2006;39:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.09.007. PubMed DOI
Plesinger F, Jurco J, Halamek J, Jurak P. SignalPlant: an open signal processing software platform. Physiol Meas. 2016; doi:10.1088/0967-3334/37/7/N38. PubMed
Plesinger F, Jurco J, Jurak P, Halamek J. Robust multichannel QRS detection. Comput Cardiol. 2014;41:557–560.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka A, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer M, Sutton J, Stewart W. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006;7:79–108. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2005.12.014. PubMed DOI
Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt O, Cleland J, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Elliott PM, Gorenek B, Israel CW, Leclercq C, Linde C, Mont L, Padeletti L, Sutton R, Vardas PE. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA) Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2281–2329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150. PubMed DOI
Yu CM, Bleeker GB, Fung JWH, Schalij MJ, Zhang Q, van der Wall EE, Chan YS, Kong SL, Bax JJ. Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2005;112:1580–1586. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.538272. PubMed DOI
Arbelo E, Tolosana JM, Trucco E, Penela D, Borras R, Doltra A, Andreu D, Acena M, Berruezo A, Sitges M, Mansour F, Castel A, Matas M, Brugada J, Mont L. Fusion-optimized intervals (FOI): a new method to achieve the narrowest QRS for optimization of the AV and VV intervals in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:283–292. doi: 10.1111/jce.12322. PubMed DOI
Stavrakis S, Lazzara R, Thadani U. The benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy and QRS duration: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23:163–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02144.x. PubMed DOI
Sipahi I, Fang JC. FACCQRS duration criteria to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT should be reserved for a QRS duration ≥150 ms: pro. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:436–442. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.000160. PubMed DOI
Punn R, Hanisch D, Motonaga KS, Rosenthal DN, Ceresnak SR, Dubin AM. A pilot study assessing ECG versus ECHO Ventriculoventricular optimization in pediatric resynchronization patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:210–216. doi: 10.1111/jce.12863. PubMed DOI
Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, Abraham WT, Ghio S, Leclercq C, Bax JJ, Yu CM, Gorcsan J, 3rd, St John Sutton M, De Sutter J, Murillo J. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–2616. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120. PubMed DOI
Leclercq C, Faris O, Tunin R, Johnson J, Kato R, Evans F, Spinelli J, Halperin H, McVeigh E, Kass DA. Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 2002;106:1760–1763. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000035037.11968.5C. PubMed DOI
Kroon W, Lumens J, Potse M, Suerder D, Klersy C, Regoli F, Murzilli R, Moccetti T. Delhaas T2, Krause R, Prinzen FW, Auricchio a. In vivo electromechanical assessment of heart failure patients with prolonged QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1259–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.006. PubMed DOI
The relationship between ECG predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit