Robustness of Representative Signals Relative to Data Loss Using Atlas-Based Parcellations
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
U54 MH091657
NIMH NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
29693205
DOI
10.1007/s10548-018-0647-6
PII: 10.1007/s10548-018-0647-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Atlas, Coverage, Parcellation, Representative signal, fMRI,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Atlases as Topic * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Functional Laterality MeSH
- Individuality MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Linear Models MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Brain Mapping methods MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Brain diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Computer Simulation MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Photic Stimulation MeSH
- Healthy Volunteers MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
Parcellation-based approaches are an important part of functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis. They are a necessary processing step for sorting data in structurally or functionally homogenous regions. Real functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets usually do not cover the atlas template completely; they are often spatially constrained due to the physical limitations of MR sequence settings, the inter-individual variability in brain shape, etc. When using a parcellation template, many regions are not completely covered by actual data. This paper addresses the issue of the area coverage required in real data in order to reliably estimate the representative signal and the influence of this kind of data loss on network analysis metrics. We demonstrate this issue on four datasets using four different widely used parcellation templates. We used two erosion approaches to simulate data loss on the whole-brain level and the ROI-specific level. Our results show that changes in ROI coverage have a systematic influence on network measures. Based on the results of our analysis, we recommend controlling the ROI coverage and retaining at least 60% of the area in order to ensure at least 80% of explained variance of the original signal.
References provided by Crossref.org