An open-label extension study to demonstrate long-term safety and efficacy of ABP 501 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
n/a
Amgen - International
PubMed
30922373
PubMed Central
PMC6440148
DOI
10.1186/s13075-019-1857-3
PII: 10.1186/s13075-019-1857-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ABP 501, Adalimumab, Biosimilar, Efficacy, Long-term safety, Rheumatoid arthritis,
- MeSH
- adalimumab škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- antirevmatika škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nazofaryngitida chemicky indukované MeSH
- revmatoidní artritida farmakoterapie MeSH
- rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- ABP 501 MeSH Prohlížeč
- adalimumab MeSH
- antirevmatika MeSH
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky MeSH
BACKGROUND: ABP 501 was evaluated in a phase 3 single-arm, open-label extension (OLE) study to collect additional safety and efficacy data in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Subjects completing the final visit in the parent phase 3 randomized, double-blind, controlled equivalence study comparing the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 with adalimumab reference product (RP) were enrolled in this open-label extension (OLE) study. All subjects received 40 mg ABP 501 every other week for 68 weeks. Key safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and anti-drug antibody (ADA) incidences. Efficacy endpoints included ACR20 (at least 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology core set measurements from baseline) and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) change from baseline. RESULTS: Among 466/467 patients treated with ABP 501, 229 transitioned from the ABP 501 arm of the parent study (ABP 501/ABP 501) and 237 from the adalimumab RP arm (RP/ABP 501); 412/467 (88.2%) patients completed the study. The overall TEAE incidence was 63.7% (297/466); grade ≥ 3 TEAE incidence was 9.0% (42/466). The incidence of TEAEs leading to discontinuation of investigational product was 3.6% (17/466). The SAE incidence was 9.9% (46/466). Overall, 18.2% (85/466) of subjects developed binding ADAs and 6.9% (32/466) developed neutralizing ADAs in the OLE study. The ACR20 response rate was 73.3% (340/464 subjects) at OLE baseline, and 78.8% (327/415 subjects) at week 70 of the OLE study. The overall mean DAS28-CRP change from the parent study baseline was - 2.25 at the OLE study baseline (n = 440), - 2.36 at week 4 (n = 463), - 2.41 at week 24 (n = 450), - 2.55 at week 48 (n = 433), and - 2.60 at week 70 (n = 412). Efficacy was maintained throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy previously demonstrated in the parent study was maintained in this OLE study with no new safety findings. Long-term safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were similar in the ABP 501/ABP 501 and RP/ABP 501 groups. The single switch from RP to ABP 501 did not impact immunogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02114931.
Abteilung für Nephrologie und Rheumatologie Göttingen Germany
Arthritis and Rheumatism Associates Wheaton MD USA
Biosimilars Development Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks CA USA
Institute of Rheumatology Prague 2 Czech Republic
Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Segal R, Yaron M, Tartakovsky B. Methotrexate: mechanism of action in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990;20(3):190–200. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90060-S. PubMed DOI
Dörner T, Strand V, Cornes P, Gonçalves J, Gulácsi L, Kay J, et al. The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209166. PubMed PMC
Mulcahy AW, Hlavka JP, Case SR. Biosimilar cost savings in the United States: initial experience and future potential. Rand Health Q. 2018;7(4):3. PubMed PMC
Ventola CL. Biosimilars: part 2: potential concerns and challenges for p&t committees. P T. 2013;38(6):329–335. PubMed PMC
Araújo FC, Gonçalves J, Fonseca JE. Pharmacoeconomics of biosimilars: what is there to gain from them? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016. 10.1007/s11926-016-0601-0. PubMed
Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P, Kim H, Kim SY, Cho YY, Péntek M. Biosimilars for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: economic considerations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015. 10.1586/1744666X.2015.1090313. PubMed
European Medicines Agency . Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. 2013.
European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on biosimilar medicines (similar biological medicinal products). Available at: https://www.medicinesforeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/WC500020062.pdf. Accessed Aug 31.
US Food and Drug Administration . Biosimilars: questions and answers regarding implementation of the biologics price competition and innovation act of 2009. 2015.
US Food and Drug Administration . Quality considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity of a therapeutic protein product to a reference product. 2015.
US Food and Drug Administration . Scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product. 2015.
US Food and Drug Administration . Clinical pharmacology data to support a demonstration of biosimilarity to a reference product. 2016.
The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency . Guideline for the quality, safety, and efficacy assurance of follow-on biologics. 2009.
European Medicines Agency . Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. 2014.
Markus R, Liu J, Ramchandani M, Landa D, Born T, Kaur P. Developing the totality of evidence for biosimilars: regulatory considerations and building confidence for the healthcare community. BioDrugs. 2017. 10.1007/s40259-017-0218-5. PubMed PMC
Alten R, Cronstein BN. Clinical trial development for biosimilars. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.04.002. PubMed
Olech E. Biosimilars: rationale and current regulatory landscape. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.001. PubMed
Al-Sabbagh A, Olech E, McClellan JE, Kirchhoff CF. Development of biosimilars. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.002. PubMed
European Medicines Agency. European public assessment reports. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/download-medicine-data. Accessed 17 Aug 2018.
US Food and Drug Administration . FDA-approved biosimilar products. 2018.
Liu J, Eris T, Li C, Cao S, Kuhns S. Assessing analytical similarity of proposed Amgen biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab. BioDrugs. 2016;30(4):321–338. doi: 10.1007/s40259-016-0184-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Velayudhan J, Chen YF, Rohrbach A, Pastula C, Maher G, Thomas H, et al. Demonstration of functional similarity of proposed biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab. BioDrugs. 2016;30(4):339–351. doi: 10.1007/s40259-016-0185-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, Foley P, Gooderham M, Kaur P, et al. Clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017. 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.014. PubMed
Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, Foley P, Gooderham M, Kaur P, et al. Clinical similarity of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab after single transition: long-term results from a randomized controlled, double-blind, 52-week, phase III trial in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017. 10.1111/bjd.15857. PubMed
Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, Pavelka K, et al. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459. PubMed PMC
Maini RN, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Davis D, Macfarlane JD, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(9):1552–1563. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1552::AID-ART5>3.0.CO;2-W. PubMed DOI
Pascual-Salcedo D, Plasencia C, Ramiro S, Nuño L, Bonilla G, Nagore D, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the efficacy of long-term treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker124. PubMed
Bendtzen K, Geborek P, Svenson M, Larsson L, Kapetanovic MC, Saxne T. Individualized monitoring of drug bioavailability and immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor infliximab. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(12):3782–3789. doi: 10.1002/art.22214. PubMed DOI
Jani M, Barton A, Warren RB, Griffiths CE, Chinoy H. The role of DMARDs in reducing the immunogenicity of TNF inhibitors in chronic inflammatory diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014. 10.1093/rheumatology/ket260. PubMed PMC
Krieckaert CL, Bartelds GM, Lems WF, Wolbink GJ. The effect of immunomodulators on the immunogenicity of TNF-blocking therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: a review. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010. 10.1186/ar3147. PubMed PMC
European Medicines Agency. Summary of product characteristics. Humira (adalimumab). 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/product-information/humira-epar-product-information_en.pdf.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02114931