Histologic Classification and Molecular Signature of Polymorphous Adenocarcinoma (PAC) and Cribriform Adenocarcinoma of Salivary Gland (CASG): An International Interobserver Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Grantová podpora
P01 CA240239
NCI NIH HHS - United States
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
31917707
PubMed Central
PMC7437128
DOI
10.1097/pas.0000000000001431
PII: 00000478-202004000-00013
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adenokarcinom klasifikace genetika patologie MeSH
- biopsie MeSH
- fúze genů MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- mutační analýza DNA MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery genetika MeSH
- nádory slinných žláz klasifikace genetika patologie MeSH
- odchylka pozorovatele MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Kanada MeSH
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
- Názvy látek
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
Polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC) shows histologic diversity with streaming and targetoid features whereas cribriform adenocarcinoma of salivary gland (CASG) demonstrates predominantly cribriform and solid patterns with glomeruloid structures and optically clear nuclei. Opinions diverge on whether CASG represents a separate entity or a variant of PAC. We aimed to assess the level of agreement among 25 expert Head and Neck pathologists in classifying these tumors. Digital slides of 48 cases were reviewed and classified as: PAC, CASG, tumors with ≥50% of papillary architecture (PAP), and tumors with indeterminate features (IND). The consensus diagnoses were correlated with a previously reported molecular alteration. The consensus diagnoses were PAC in 18/48, CASG in16/48, PAP in 3/48, and IND in 11/48. There was a fair interobserver agreement in classifying the tumors (κ=0.370). The full consensus was achieved in 3 (6%) cases, all of which were classified as PAC. A moderate agreement was reached for PAC (κ=0.504) and PAP (κ=0.561), and a fair agreement was reached for CASG (κ=0.390). IND had only slight diagnostic concordance (κ=0.091). PAC predominantly harbored PRKD1 hotspot mutation, whereas CASG was associated with fusion involving PRKD1, PRKD2, or PRKD3. However, such molecular events were not exclusive as 7% of PAC had fusion and 13% of CASG had mutation. In conclusion, a fair to moderate interobserver agreement can be achieved in classifying PAC and CASG. However, a subset (23%) showed indeterminate features and was difficult to place along the morphologic spectrum of PAC/CASG among expert pathologists. This may explain the controversy in classifying these tumors.
Department of Histopathology The Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford UK
Department of Pathology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Department of Pathology Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Plzen Czech Republic
Department of Pathology Cornell University New York NY
Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital
Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Department of Pathology Moffitt Cancer Center University of South Florida Tampa FL
Department of Pathology Southern California Permanente Medical Group CA
Department of Pathology University Health Network University of Toronto Toronto
Department of Pathology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital Pittsburgh PA
Department of Pathology UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX
Department of Pathology Yale University School of Medicine New Haven CT
Department of Tumour Pathology Institute of Oncology University of Istanbul Istanbul Turkey
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Batsakis JG, Pinkston GR, Luna MA, et al. Adenocarcinomas of the oral cavity: a clinicopathologic study of terminal duct carcinomas. J Laryngol Otol. 1983;97:825–835. PubMed
Evans HL, Batsakis JG. Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma of minor salivary glands. A study of 14 cases of a distinctive neoplasm. Cancer. 1984;53:935–942. PubMed
El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours, 4th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2017.
Evans HL, Luna MA. Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma: a study of 40 cases with long-term follow up and an evaluation of the importance of papillary areas. Am J Stag Pathol. 2000;24:1319–1328. PubMed
Seethala RR, Johnson JT, Barnes EL, et al. Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma: the LTniversity of Pittsburgh experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Slug. 2010;136:385–392. PubMed
Castle JT, Thompson LD, Frommelt RA, et al. Polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 164 cases. Cancer. 1999;86:207–219. PubMed
Kimple AJ, Austin GK, Shah RN, et al. Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma: a case series and determination of recurrence. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:2714–2719. PubMed PMC
Xu B, Aneja A, Ghossein R, et al. Predictors of outcome in the phenotypic spectrum of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) and cribriform adenocarcinoma of salivary gland (CASG): a retrospective study of 69 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:1526–1537. PubMed PMC
Michal M, Skalova A, Simpson RH, et al. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue: a hitherto unrecognized type of adenocarcinoma characteristically occurring in the tongue. Histopathology. 1999;35:495–501. PubMed
Michal M, Kacerovska D, Kazakov DV. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue and minor salivary glands: a review. Head Neck Pathol. 2013;7(suppl 1):S3–S11. PubMed PMC
Skalova A, Sima R, Kaspirkova-Nemcova J, et al. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland origin principally affecting the tongue: characterization of new entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35: 1168–1176. PubMed
Cocek A, Hronkova K, Voldanova J, et al. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of the base of the tongue and low-grade, polymorphic adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands. Oncol Lett. 2011;2:135–138. PubMed PMC
Weinreb I, Zhang L, Tirunagari LM, et al. Novel PRKD gene rearrangements and variant fusions in cribriform adenocarcinoma of salivary gland origin. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014;53:845–856. PubMed
Barnes EL, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2005.
Gnepp DR. Salivary gland tumor “wishes” to add to the next WHO Tumor Classification: sclerosing polycystic adenosis, mammary analogue secretory carcinoma, cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue and other sites, and mucinous variant of myoepithelioma. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8:42–49. PubMed PMC
Weinreb I, Piscuoglio S, Martelotto LG, et al. Hotspot activating PRKD1 somatic mutations in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas of the salivary glands. Nat Genet. 2014;46: 1166–1169. PubMed PMC
Skalova A, Gnepp DR, Lewis JS Jr, et al. Newly described entities in salivary gland pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:e33–e47. PubMed
Sebastiao APM, Xu B, Lozada JR, et al. Histologic spectrum of polymorphous adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland harbor genetic alterations affecting PRKD genes. Mod Pathol. 2019;33:65–73. PubMed PMC
Laco J, Kamaradova K, Vitkova P, et al. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of minor salivary glands may express galectin-3, cytokeratin 19, and HBME-1 and contains polymorphisms of RET and H-RAS proto-oncogenes. Virchows Arch. 2012;461:531–540. PubMed
Allen MS Jr, Fitz-Hugh GS, Marsh WL Jr. Low-grade papillary adenocarcinoma of the palate. Cancer. 1974;33:153–158. PubMed
Mills SE, Garland TA, Allen MS Jr. Low-grade papillary adenocarcinoma of palatal salivary gland origin. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8:367–374. PubMed
Slootweg PJ, Muller H. Low-grade adenocarcinoma of the oral cavity. A comparison between the terminal duct and the papillary type. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987;15:359–364. PubMed
Hunter JB, Smith RV, Brandwein-Gensler M. Low-grade papillary adenocarcinoma of the palate: the significance of distinguishing it from polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2008;2:316–323. PubMed PMC
Evans AJ, Bauer TW, Bui MM, et al. US Food and Drug Administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:1383–1387. PubMed
Mukhopadhyay S, Feldman MD, Abels E, et al. Whole Slide imaging versus microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: a multicenter blinded randomized noninferiority study of 1992 cases (pivotal study). Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:39–52. PubMed PMC
Development of head and neck pathology in Europe