Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone in clinical T2 bladder cancer without hydronephrosis

. 2021 Jul ; 128 (1) : 79-87. [epub] 20201121

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33152179

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) in a retrospective multicentre cohort of patients with cT2N0M0 bladder cancer (BCa) without preoperative hydronephrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a propensity-based analysis of 619 patients. Of these, 316 were treated with NAC followed by RC and 303 with upfront RC. After multiple imputations, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for potential selection bias. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of NAC on pathological complete response and downstaging at RC, while IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were built to evaluate the impact of NAC on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After IPTW-adjusted analysis, standardised differences between groups were <15%. A complete response (pT0N0) at final pathology was achieved in 94 (30%) patients receiving NAC and nine (3%) undergoing upfront RC. Downstaging to non-muscle-invasive disease (

Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton AB Canada

Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USA

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

Department of Medicine Division of Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle WA USA

Department of Oncology University of Alberta Alberta AB Canada

Department of Surgery Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Exeter UK

Department of Surgery McGill University Health Center Montreal Canada

Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada

Department of Urologic Surgery Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN USA

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Davis Medical Center University of California at Davis Sacramento CA USA

Department of Urology Freeman Hospital Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

Department of Urology MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA

Department of Urology The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA

Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KS USA

Department of Urology University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor MI USA

Department of Urology University of Oklahoma College of Medicine Oklahoma City OK USA

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology University of Washington Seattle WA USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health 1 M Sechenov 1st Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia

Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto ON Canada

University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas Ret al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2020 guidelines. Eur Urol 2020 [Online ahead of print]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055

Yin M, Joshi M, Meijer RP et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and two-step meta-analysis. Oncologist 2016; 21: 708-15

Liu W, Tian J, Zhang S et al. The utilization status of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020 [Online ahead of print]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03648-8

Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 859-66

Griffiths G. International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2171-7

Moschini M, Soria F, Klatte T et al. Validation of preoperative risk grouping of the selection of patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15: e267-73

Culp SH, Dickstein RJ, Grossman HB et al. Refining patient selection for neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy. J Urol 2014; 191: 40-7

Green DA, Rink M, Hansen J et al. Accurate preoperative prediction of non-organ-confined bladder urothelial carcinoma at cystectomy. BJU Int 2013; 111: 404-11

Sherif A, Holmberg L, Rintala E et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a combined analysis of two Nordic studies. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 297-303

Winquist E, Kirchner TS, Segal R, Chin J, Lukka H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 2004; 171: 561-9

Advanced Bladder Cancer Overview Collaboration. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 2: CD005246

Hermans TJ, Voskuilen CS, Deelen M et al. Superior efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in cT3-4aN0M0 compared to cT2N0M0 bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 1453-9

Black PC, Brown GA, Grossman HB, Dinney CP. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer. World J Urol 2006; 24: 531-42

Martini T, Gilfrich C, Mayr R et al. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: current practice among clinicians. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15: 356-62

Zargar H, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Lotan Y et al. Final pathological stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer-does pT0 predict better survival than pTa/Tis/T1? J Urol 2016; 195: 886-93

Rosenblatt R, Sherif A, Rintala E et al. Pathologic downstaging is a surrogate marker for efficacy and increased survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 1229-38

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...