Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a rare and challenging problem. We sought to describe epidemiology, management and outcome of women in whom breast cancer was diagnosed during pregnancy or within one year after delivery. Thirty-two women with PABC were referred to two European Union oncology centers between 1995 and 2007, 16 during pregnancy and 16 within 1 year after delivery. Data concerning diagnosis, management, delivery and fetal and maternal outcome were recorded. A group of 32 patients (matched controls) presenting with nonpregnancy-associated breast cancer (non-PABC) was matched for age at diagnosis, tumor size and stage to each PABC patient. Differences in outcome between the PABC and non-PABC groups were then assessed. Histological features were similar in both groups, except that estrogen receptor-negative tumors were more common in the PABC group. Three patients received chemotherapy and two others underwent surgery during pregnancy, with no excess toxicity or severe maternal/fetal adverse effects. All children in the PABC group were healthy, except for one exposed to epirubicin in utero and born with rectal atresia. Overall survival was similar in PABC and non-PABC patients (p = 0.449). The subgroup of patients with breast cancer diagnosed within one year after delivery showed a shorter time to relapse than controls or patients with gestational cancer (p = 0.0178). PABC is a special situation, necessitating individualized, multi-disciplinary management. Prognosis is similar for women with nongestational cancer matched for age and stage though poorer outcome postpartum should be further investigated.
- MeSH
- císařský řez MeSH
- indukovaný potrat statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové komplikace v těhotenství diagnóza chirurgie mortalita terapie MeSH
- nádory prsu diagnóza mortalita patologie terapie MeSH
- poruchy v puerperiu diagnóza mortalita patologie terapie MeSH
- protinádorové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- radioterapie MeSH
- receptor erbB-2 analýza MeSH
- receptory pro estrogeny analýza MeSH
- receptory progesteronu analýza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vedení porodu MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Řecko MeSH
Many randomised trials have compared different systemic treatment regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. While survival advances have apparently been achieved, the magnitude of these incremental benefits across diverse regimens is less clear. The aim of our study was to estimate the magnitude of survival and disease progression benefits with the use of different regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomised trials comparing systemic treatment regimens in advanced colorectal cancer. Treatment was categorised by use of or no use of fluorouracil-based regimens, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab. We used multiple-treatment meta-analysis methodology to combine information from direct comparisons (ie, treatments compared within a randomised trial) and indirect comparisons (ie, treatments compared between trials by combining results on how effective they are against a common comparator treatment) of different chemotherapy regimens. The primary endpoint was death and the secondary endpoint was disease progression. Monte Carlo simulations were used to establish which regimen offered the most benefit for these endpoints. We did analyses of all trials and analysed separately trials that studied first-line treatments and non-first-line treatments. FINDINGS: 242 trials published in 1967-2007 (N=56 677 patients) involved 137 different chemotherapy regimens. 37 of these trials were eligible for the multiple-treatment meta-analysis, according to our categorisation, including 47 comparisons of data on death (N=13 875 patients) and 48 comparisons of data on disease progression (N=15 158 patients). Compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin alone, the risk of death was most decreased with the addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% credibility intervals (CrI) 0.44-0.84) and considerable benefits were also noted with addition of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (HR 0.72 [95% CrI 0.54-0.97]); oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (HR 0.72 [0.57-0.90]); bevacizumab alone (HR 0.78 [0.60-1.03]); and oxaliplatin alone (HR 0.87 [0.78-0.98]). The disease progression benefits were even more prominent for the addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab (HR 0.41 [0.28-0.60]); irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (0.53 [0.38-0.73]); oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (0.46 [0.34-0.61]); bevacizumab alone (0.56 [0.41-0.76]); oxaliplatin alone (0.64 [0.56-0.73]); irinotecan plus cetuximab (HR 0.62 [0.42-0.92]); and irinotecan alone (HR 0.73 [0.65-0.82]). Findings were similar for first-line and non-first-line treatment analyses although data were sparse for non-first-line treatment analyses. Compared with a patient with an anticipated 1-year survival who is treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin, the absolute survival benefit is estimated at 8 months' prolongation with addition of irinotecan plus bevacizumab, 4.7 months' prolongation with addition of oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin, and 1-1.8 months' prolongation with addition of irinotecan alone or oxaliplatin alone. INTERPRETATION: Distinct incremental benefits are noted for diverse chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with more prominent effects on disease progression than on death. More data are needed at least for the newest drugs to estimate more accurately the magnitude of the benefit derived from their use.
