BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is typically treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). However, only 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP. Polatuzumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD79b, which is ubiquitously expressed on the surface of malignant B cells. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase 3 trial to evaluate a modified regimen of R-CHOP (pola-R-CHP), in which vincristine was replaced with polatuzumab vedotin, as compared with standard R-CHOP, in patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk DLBCL. Patients 18 to 80 years of age were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive six cycles of either pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP, plus two cycles of rituximab alone. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 879 patients underwent randomization: 440 were assigned to the pola-R-CHP group and 439 to the R-CHOP group. After a median follow-up of 28.2 months, the percentage of patients surviving without progression was significantly higher in the pola-R-CHP group than in the R-CHOP group (76.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.7 to 80.8] vs. 70.2% [95% CI, 65.8 to 74.6] at 2 years; stratified hazard ratio for progression, relapse, or death, 0.73 by Cox regression; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; P = 0.02). Overall survival at 2 years did not differ significantly between the groups (88.7% [95% CI, 85.7 to 91.6] in the pola-R-CHP group and 88.6% [95% CI, 85.6 to 91.6] in the R-CHOP group; hazard ratio for death, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.37; P = 0.75). The safety profile was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously untreated intermediate-risk or high-risk DLBCL, the risk of disease progression, relapse, or death was lower among those who received pola-R-CHP than among those who received R-CHOP. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; POLARIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03274492.).

• MeSH
• cyklofosfamid škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• difúzní velkobuněčný B-lymfom farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• doxorubicin škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• imunokonjugáty aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• prednison škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• rituximab škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vinkristin škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

CONTEXT: R-CHOP is the standard of care for newly diagnosed DLBCL patients; however, 40% remain uncured. Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), a CD79b-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, has shown promising activity/safety in a Phase Ib/II study (Tilly, et al. Lancet Oncol 2019). We report the Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled, international POLARIX study (NCT03274492), which compared Pola-R-CHP with R-CHOP in treatment-naïve DLBCL patients with an International Prognostic Index score of 2-5. DESIGN: Patients were randomized (1:1) to six cycles of Pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP and on Day 1 of each cycle received Pola 1.8mg/kg or vincristine 1.4mg/m2, plus intravenous rituximab 375mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50mg/m2. Patients also received oral prednisone 100mg once daily (Days 1-5) and two further cycles of rituximab. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Overall, 879 patients (median age 65 [range 19-80] years) were randomized (Pola-R-CHP: n=440; R-CHOP: n=439). At primary data cut-off (28 June 2021), median follow-up was 28.2 months. PFS was superior with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.95; P=0.02) and 2-year PFS rate was improved (76.7% [95% CI: 72.7-80.8] vs 70.2% [95% CI: 65.8-74.6], respectively). Investigator-assessed event-free survival favored Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (HR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; P=0.02) and overall survival was comparable (HR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.65-1.37; P=0.75). While independent review committee-assessed end-of-treatment complete response rate by positron emission tomography-computed tomography was not significantly different with Pola-R-CHP (78.0%) vs R-CHOP (74.0%; P=0.16), disease-free survival suggested more durable responses with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.98). Safety profiles were similar for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP: grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) rates, 57.7% vs 57.5%, respectively; serious AEs, 34.0% vs 30.6%; grade 5 AEs, 3.0% vs 2.3%; AEs leading to dose reduction, 9.2% vs 13.0%; and peripheral neuropathy, any grade, 52.9% vs 53.9%. At data cut-off, fewer patients treated with Pola-R-CHP (23%) vs R-CHOP (30%) had received ≥1 subsequent anti-lymphoma therapy. CONCLUSIONS: As the first-line treatment of DLBCL, Pola-R-CHP demonstrated a 27% reduction in the relative risk of disease progression, relapse, or death, and a similar safety profile, compared with R-CHOP.

• MeSH
• cyklofosfamid škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• difúzní velkobuněčný B-lymfom * terapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• doxorubicin škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• imunokonjugáty * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie   MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• prednison škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• rituximab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vinkristin škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH