-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Nové antikoagulans v léčbě fibrilace síní?
[Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial]
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
- MeSH
- acenokumarol škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- antikoagulancia škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda prevence a kontrola MeSH
- faktor Xa MeSH
- fibrilace síní farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- inhibitory faktoru Xa MeSH
- jednoduchá slepá metoda MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- krvácení chemicky indukované MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- oligosacharidy škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tromboembolie epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- vitamin K antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- warfarin škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
Vitamin K antagonists, the current standard treatment for prophylaxis against stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, require regular monitoring and dose adjustment; an unmonitored, fixed-dose anticoagulant regimen would be preferable. The aim of this randomised, open-label non-inferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists. METHODS: Patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonists (target of an international normalised ratio of 2-3). Assessment of outcome was done blinded to treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of all stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding. Analyses were done by intention to treat; the non-inferiority hazard ratio was set at 1.5. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00070655. FINDINGS: The trial was stopped after randomisation of 4576 patients (2283 to receive idraparinux, 2293 to receive vitamin K antagonists) and a mean follow-up period of 10.7 (SD 5.4) months because of excess clinically relevant bleeding with idraparinux (346 cases vs 226 cases; 19.7 vs 11.3 per 100 patient-years; p<0.0001). There were 21 instances of intracranial bleeding with idraparinux and nine with vitamin K antagonists (1.1 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years; p=0.014); elderly patients and those with renal impairment were at greater risk of such complications. There were 18 cases of thromboembolism with idraparinux and 27 cases with vitamin K antagonists (0.9 vs 1.3 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.30; p=0.007), satisfying the non-inferiority criterion. There were 62 deaths with idraparinux and 61 with vitamin K anatagonists (3.2 vs 2.9 per 100 patient-years; p=0.49). INTERPRETATION: In patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism, long-term treatment with idraparinux was no worse than vitamin K antagonists in terms of efficacy, but caused significantly more bleeding.
Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07513946
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210124752.0
- 008
- 081215s2008 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 245 00
- $a Nové antikoagulans v léčbě fibrilace síní?.
- 246 11
- $a Comparison of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
- 520 9_
- $a Vitamin K antagonists, the current standard treatment for prophylaxis against stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, require regular monitoring and dose adjustment; an unmonitored, fixed-dose anticoagulant regimen would be preferable. The aim of this randomised, open-label non-inferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of idraparinux with vitamin K antagonists. METHODS: Patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous idraparinux (2.5 mg weekly) or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonists (target of an international normalised ratio of 2-3). Assessment of outcome was done blinded to treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the cumulative incidence of all stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding. Analyses were done by intention to treat; the non-inferiority hazard ratio was set at 1.5. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00070655. FINDINGS: The trial was stopped after randomisation of 4576 patients (2283 to receive idraparinux, 2293 to receive vitamin K antagonists) and a mean follow-up period of 10.7 (SD 5.4) months because of excess clinically relevant bleeding with idraparinux (346 cases vs 226 cases; 19.7 vs 11.3 per 100 patient-years; p<0.0001). There were 21 instances of intracranial bleeding with idraparinux and nine with vitamin K antagonists (1.1 vs 0.4 per 100 patient-years; p=0.014); elderly patients and those with renal impairment were at greater risk of such complications. There were 18 cases of thromboembolism with idraparinux and 27 cases with vitamin K antagonists (0.9 vs 1.3 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.30; p=0.007), satisfying the non-inferiority criterion. There were 62 deaths with idraparinux and 61 with vitamin K anatagonists (3.2 vs 2.9 per 100 patient-years; p=0.49). INTERPRETATION: In patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism, long-term treatment with idraparinux was no worse than vitamin K antagonists in terms of efficacy, but caused significantly more bleeding.
- 650 _2
- $a acenokumarol $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antikoagulancia $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000925
- 650 _2
- $a fibrilace síní $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $7 D001281
- 650 _2
- $a faktor Xa $7 D015951
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení $x chemicky indukované $7 D006470
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a oligosacharidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D009844
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
- 650 _2
- $a cévní mozková příhoda $x prevence a kontrola $7 D020521
- 650 _2
- $a tromboembolie $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D013923
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a vitamin K $x antagonisté a inhibitory $7 D014812
- 650 _2
- $a warfarin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D014859
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory faktoru Xa $7 D065427
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 2, č. 3 (2008), s. 22-23 $x 1213-2586
- 787 18
- $w bmc07513947 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Nové antikoagulans v léčbě fibrilace síní?]
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20081212145120 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20090106100157 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 629541 $s 481996
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 2 $c 3 $d 22-23 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
- LZP __
- $a 2008-23/mkme