Antibiotic resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from captive snakes
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial * MeSH
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections microbiology veterinary MeSH
- Snakes microbiology MeSH
- Suppuration microbiology MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests MeSH
- Carrier State microbiology veterinary MeSH
- Stenotrophomonas maltophilia drug effects isolation & purification MeSH
- Mouth microbiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anti-Bacterial Agents MeSH
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 24 antibiotics were determined for 45 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains by the microdilution method at 37 and 30 degrees C (after 24 h and 48 h of incubation). The isolates were obtained from mouth swabs and pus of 116 captive snakes whereas the identical strains (based on PFGE) of the same origin were discarded. At 37 degrees C, the isolates showed a low frequency of resistance to levofloxacin (0 and 8.9 % of resistant strains after 24 and 48 h, MICs(50) 0.5 and 1 mg/L, MICs(90) 1 and 2 mg/L) and cotrimoxazole (2.2 % of resistant strains for 24 and 48 h, MICs(50) 4 mg/L for both time periods, MICs(90) 4 and 8). At 30 degrees C, the most effective drugs were also cotrimoxazole (2.2 and 6.7 %, MICs(50) 4 and 8, MICs(90) 8 and 32) and levofloxacin (8.9 and 46.7 %, MICs(50) 1 and 2, MICs(90) 2 and 4). The isolates were either identically or more susceptible to antibiotics than strains acquired from patients hospitalized at Olomouc University Hospital (the same region) with the exception of ciprofloxacin, cefoperazone, cefoperazone/sulbactam and ceftazidime.
See more in PubMed
Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Nov-Dec;12(6):997-1003 PubMed
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1981 Dec 1;179(11):1223-6 PubMed
New Microbiol. 2000 Oct;23(4):415-21 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Apr 15;121(3-4):357-62 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Nov;37(11):3594-600 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):57-80 PubMed
J Chemother. 1994 Apr;6(2):111-6 PubMed
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1998 Mar;7(1):12-4 PubMed
Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;7(11):1673-85 PubMed
Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(5):499-502 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Oct;38(10):2317-22 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(2):151-5 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(6):742-6 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Feb;57(2):199-203 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Oct;70(10):6342-6 PubMed
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;11(3):134-8 PubMed
Microb Ecol. 2000 May;39(4):322-329 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007;52(1):86-90 PubMed