General factors important for the formation of structured biofilm-like yeast colonies
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
55005623
Howard Hughes Medical Institute - United States
PubMed
20728557
DOI
10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.005
PII: S1087-1845(10)00151-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biofilms * MeSH
- Hyphae genetics growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics growth & development physiology MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins MeSH
The lifestyle of wild and laboratory yeast strains significantly differs. In contrast to the smooth colonies of laboratory strains, wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains form biofilm-like, strikingly structured colonies possessing distinctive traits enabling them to better survive in hostile environments in the wild. Here, comparing three sets of strains forming differently structured colonies (fluffy, semi-fluffy and smooth), each derived from ancestors with distinct genetic backgrounds isolated from natural settings (BR-88, BR-99 and BR-103), we specified the factors essential for the formation of structured colonies, i.e. for the lifestyle most likely to be preferred in the wild. The ability to form an abundant extracellular matrix (ECM) is one of the features typical for structured colonies. ECM influences colony architecture and many other physiological properties, such as the capability to retain water in a 2-fold surplus to wet cell biomass. ECM composition, however, differs among distinct strains, depending on their particular genetic background. We further show that the expression of certain genes (AQY1, FLO11) is also strictly related to the particular colony morphology, being highest in the most structured colonies. Flo11p adhesin, important for cell-cell and cell-surface adhesion, is essential for the formation of fluffy colonies and thus significantly contributes to the phenotype variability of wild yeast strains. On the other hand, surprisingly, neither the cell shape nor budding pattern nor the ability to form pseudohyphae directly influences the formation of three-dimensional fluffy colony architecture.
References provided by Crossref.org
Cell Distribution within Yeast Colonies and Colony Biofilms: How Structure Develops
Global changes in gene expression associated with phenotypic switching of wild yeast
Yeast colonies: a model for studies of aging, environmental adaptation, and longevity
Reactive oxygen species in the signaling and adaptation of multicellular microbial communities
Flo11p, drug efflux pumps, and the extracellular matrix cooperate to form biofilm yeast colonies