Yeast biofilms are complex multicellular structures, in which the cells are well protected against drugs and other treatments and thus highly resistant to antifungal therapies. Colony biofilms represent an ideal system for studying molecular mechanisms and regulations involved in development and internal organization of biofilm structure as well as those that are involved in fungal domestication. We have identified here antagonistic functional interactions between transcriptional regulators Cyc8p and Tup1p that modulate the life-style of natural S. cerevisiae strains between biofilm and domesticated mode. Herein, strains with different levels of Cyc8p and Tup1p regulators were constructed, analyzed for processes involved in colony biofilm development and used in the identification of modes of regulation of Flo11p, a key adhesin in biofilm formation. Our data show that Tup1p and Cyc8p regulate biofilm formation in the opposite manner, being positive and negative regulators of colony complexity, cell-cell interaction and adhesion to surfaces. Notably, in-depth analysis of regulation of expression of Flo11p adhesin revealed that Cyc8p itself is the key repressor of FLO11 expression, whereas Tup1p counteracts Cyc8p's repressive function and, in addition, counters Flo11p degradation by an extracellular protease. Interestingly, the opposing actions of Tup1p and Cyc8p concern processes crucial to the biofilm mode of yeast multicellularity, whereas other multicellular processes such as cell flocculation are co-repressed by both regulators. This study provides insight into the mechanisms regulating complexity of the biofilm lifestyle of yeast grown on semisolid surfaces.

Department of Genetics and Microbiology Faculty of Science Charles University BIOCEV Vestec Czech Republic

Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences BIOCEV Vestec Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bruckner S, Mosch HU (2012) Choosing the right lifestyle: adhesion and development in PubMed DOI

Honigberg SM (2011) Cell Signals, Cell Contacts, and the Organization of Yeast Communities. Eukaryotic Cell 10: 466–473. 10.1128/EC.00313-10 PubMed DOI PMC

Palkova Z (2004) Multicellular microorganisms: laboratory versus nature. EMBO Rep 5: 470–476. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400145 PubMed DOI PMC

Palkova Z, Vachova L (2006) Life within a community: benefit to yeast long-term survival. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30: 806–824. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00034.x PubMed DOI

Palkova Z, Wilkinson D, Vachova L (2014) Aging and differentiation in yeast populations: elders with different properties and functions. FEMS Yeast Res 14: 96–108. 10.1111/1567-1364.12103 PubMed DOI

Vachova L, Stovicek V, Hlavacek O, Chernyavskiy O, Stepanek L, et al. (2011) Flo11p, drug efflux pumps, and the extracellular matrix cooperate to form biofilm yeast colonies. J Cell Biol 194: 679–687. 10.1083/jcb.201103129 PubMed DOI PMC

Palkova Z, Vachova L (2016) Yeast cell differentiation: Lessons from pathogenic and non-pathogenic yeasts. Semin Cell Dev Biol 57: 110–119. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.04.006 PubMed DOI

Tan Z, Hays M, Cromie GA, Jeffery EW, Scott AC, et al. (2013) Aneuploidy underlies a multicellular phenotypic switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 12367–12372. 10.1073/pnas.1301047110 PubMed DOI PMC

Verstrepen KJ, Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2004) Origins of variation in the fungal cell surface. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 533–540. 10.1038/nrmicro927 PubMed DOI

Vopalenska I, Stovicek V, Janderova B, Vachova L, Palkova Z (2010) Role of distinct dimorphic transitions in territory colonizing and formation of yeast colony architecture. Environ Microbiol 12: 264–277. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02067.x PubMed DOI

Ishigami M, Nakagawa Y, Hayakawa M, Iimura Y (2004) FLO11 is essential for flor formation caused by the C-terminal deletion of NRG1 in PubMed DOI

Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2001) Bakers' yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science 291: 878–881. 10.1126/science.291.5505.878 PubMed DOI

Stovicek V, Vachova L, Kuthan M, Palkova Z (2010) General factors important for the formation of structured biofilm-like yeast colonies. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 1012–1022. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.005 PubMed DOI

Voordeckers K, De Maeyer D, van der Zande E, Vinces MD, Meert W, et al. (2012) Identification of a complex genetic network underlying PubMed DOI PMC

Stovicek V, Vachova L, Begany M, Wilkinson D, Palkova Z (2014) Global changes in gene expression associated with phenotypic switching of wild yeast. BMC Genomics 15: 136 10.1186/1471-2164-15-136 PubMed DOI PMC

Rupp S, Summers E, Lo HJ, Madhani H, Fink G (1999) MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast PubMed DOI PMC

Verstrepen KJ, Klis FM (2006) Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol Microbiol 60: 5–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05072.x PubMed DOI

Vinod PK, Sengupta N, Bhat PJ, Venkatesh KV (2008) Integration of global signaling pathways, cAMP-PKA, MAPK and TOR in the regulation of PubMed DOI PMC

Barrales RR, Korber P, Jimenez J, Ibeas JI (2012) Chromatin modulation at the PubMed DOI PMC

Bumgarner SL, Dowell RD, Grisafi P, Gifford DK, Fink GR (2009) Toggle involving cis-interfering noncoding RNAs controls variegated gene expression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18321–18326. 10.1073/pnas.0909641106 PubMed DOI PMC

Halme A, Bumgarner S, Styles C, Fink GR (2004) Genetic and epigenetic regulation of the FLO gene family generates cell-surface variation in yeast. Cell 116: 405–415. PubMed

Holmes DL, Lancaster AK, Lindquist S, Halfmann R (2013) Heritable remodeling of yeast multicellularity by an environmentally responsive prion. Cell 153: 153–165. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.026 PubMed DOI PMC

Octavio LM, Gedeon K, Maheshri N (2009) Epigenetic and conventional regulation is distributed among activators of PubMed DOI PMC

Smith RL, Johnson AD (2000) Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 325–330. PubMed

Varanasi US, Klis M, Mikesell PB, Trumbly RJ (1996) The Cyc8 (Ssn6)-Tup1 corepressor complex is composed of one Cyc8 and four Tup1 subunits. Mol Cell Biol 16: 6707–6714. PubMed PMC

Matsumura H, Kusaka N, Nakamura T, Tanaka N, Sagegami K, et al. (2012) Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the yeast general corepressor Tup1p and its functional implications. J Biol Chem 287: 26528–26538. 10.1074/jbc.M112.369652 PubMed DOI PMC

DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO (1997) Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278: 680–686. PubMed

Green SR, Johnson AD (2004) Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in PubMed DOI PMC

Malave TM, Dent SY (2006) Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochem Cell Biol 84: 437–443. 10.1139/o06-073 PubMed DOI

Wilson WA, Hawley SA, Hardie DG (1996) Glucose repression/derepression in budding yeast: PubMed

Hickman MJ, Winston F (2007) Heme levels switch the function of Hap1 of PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang L, Guarente L (1994) Evidence that PubMed PMC

Fragiadakis GS, Tzamarias D, Alexandraki D (2004) Nhp6 facilitates Aft1 binding and Ssn6 recruitment, both essential for PubMed DOI PMC

Kim SJ, Swanson MJ, Qiu H, Govind CK, Hinnebusch AG (2005) Activator Gcn4p and Cyc8p/Tup1p are interdependent for promoter occupancy at PubMed DOI PMC

Tanaka N, Mukai Y (2015) Yeast Cyc8p and Tup1p proteins function as coactivators for transcription of Stp1/2p-dependent amino acid transporter genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 468: 32–38. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.001 PubMed DOI

Proft M, Struhl K (2002) Hog1 kinase converts the Sko1-Cyc8-Tup1 repressor complex into an activator that recruits SAGA and SWI/SNF in response to osmotic stress. Mol Cell 9: 1307–1317. PubMed

Chen K, Wilson MA, Hirsch C, Watson A, Liang S, et al. (2013) Stabilization of the promoter nucleosomes in nucleosome-free regions by the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor. Genome Res 23: 312–322. 10.1101/gr.141952.112 PubMed DOI PMC

Garcia-Sanchez S, Mavor AL, Russell CL, Argimon S, Dennison P, et al. (2005) Global roles of Ssn6 in Tup1- and Nrg1-dependent gene regulation in the fungal pathogen, PubMed DOI PMC

Hernday AD, Lohse MB, Nobile CJ, Noiman L, Laksana CN, et al. (2016) Ssn6 Defines a New Level of Regulation of White-Opaque Switching in PubMed DOI PMC

Alkafeef SS, Yu C, Huang L, Liu H (2018) Wor1 establishes opaque cell fate through inhibition of the general co-repressor Tup1 in PubMed DOI PMC

Lee JE, Oh JH, Ku M, Kim J, Lee JS, et al. (2015) Ssn6 has dual roles in PubMed DOI

Chen Y, Zhai S, Sun Y, Li M, Dong Y, et al. (2015) MoTup1 is required for growth, conidiogenesis and pathogenicity of PubMed DOI PMC

Kuthan M, Devaux F, Janderova B, Slaninova I, Jacq C, et al. (2003) Domestication of wild PubMed

Dowell RD, Ryan O, Jansen A, Cheung D, Agarwala S, et al. (2010) Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328: 469 10.1126/science.1189015 PubMed DOI PMC

Granek JA, Magwene PM (2010) Environmental and genetic determinants of colony morphology in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1000823 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000823 PubMed DOI PMC

Karunanithi S, Vadaie N, Chavel CA, Birkaya B, Joshi J, et al. (2010) Shedding of the mucin-like flocculin Flo11p reveals a new aspect of fungal adhesion regulation. Curr Biol 20: 1389–1395. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.033 PubMed DOI PMC

Bader O, Krauke Y, Hube B (2008) Processing of predicted substrates of fungal Kex2 proteinases from PubMed DOI PMC

Kraushaar T, Bruckner S, Veelders M, Rhinow D, Schreiner F, et al. (2015) Interactions by the Fungal Flo11 Adhesin Depend on a Fibronectin Type III-like Adhesin Domain Girdled by Aromatic Bands. Structure 23: 1005–1017. 10.1016/j.str.2015.03.021 PubMed DOI

Piccirillo S, Honigberg SM (2010) Sporulation patterning and invasive growth in wild and domesticated yeast colonies. Res Microbiol 161: 390–398. 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.04.001 PubMed DOI PMC

Hwang CS, Oh JH, Huh WK, Yim HS, Kang SO (2003) Ssn6, an important factor of morphological conversion and virulence in PubMed

Fleming AB, Beggs S, Church M, Tsukihashi Y, Pennings S (2014) The yeast Cyc8-Tup1 complex cooperates with Hda1p and Rpd3p histone deacetylases to robustly repress transcription of the subtelomeric PubMed DOI PMC

Chujo M, Yoshida S, Ota A, Murata K, Kawai S (2015) Acquisition of the ability to assimilate mannitol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through dysfunction of the general corepressor Tup1-Cyc8. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 9–16. 10.1128/AEM.02906-14 PubMed DOI PMC

Lipke PN, Hullpillsbury C (1984) Flocculation of PubMed PMC

Patel BK, Gavin-Smyth J, Liebman SW (2009) The yeast global transcriptional co-repressor protein Cyc8 can propagate as a prion. Nat Cell Biol 11: 344–349. 10.1038/ncb1843 PubMed DOI PMC

Govender P, Domingo JL, Bester MC, Pretorius IS, Bauer FF (2008) Controlled expression of the dominant flocculation genes PubMed DOI PMC

Conlan RS, Tzamarias D (2001) Sfl1 functions via the co-repressor Ssn6-Tup1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase Tpk2. J Mol Biol 309: 1007–1015. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4742 PubMed DOI

Park SH, Koh SS, Chun JH, Hwang HJ, Kang HS (1999) Nrg1 is a transcriptional repressor for glucose repression of PubMed PMC

Schuller HJ (2003) Transcriptional control of nonfermentative metabolism in the yeast PubMed DOI

Barrales RR, Jimenez J, Ibeas JI (2008) Identification of novel activation mechanisms for PubMed DOI PMC

Fichtner L, Schulze F, Braus GH (2007) Differential Flo8p-dependent regulation of PubMed DOI PMC

Gromoller A, Lehming N (2000) Srb7p is a physical and physiological target of Tup1p. EMBO J 19: 6845–6852. 10.1093/emboj/19.24.6845 PubMed DOI PMC

Naglik J, Albrecht A, Bader O, Hube B (2004) PubMed DOI

Schachtschabel D, Arentshorst M, Nitsche BM, Morris S, Nielsen KF, et al. (2013) The transcriptional repressor TupA in PubMed DOI PMC

Mao X, Li Y, Wang H, Cao F, Chen J (2008) Antagonistic interplay of Swi1 and Tup1 on filamentous growth of PubMed DOI

Goldstein AL, McCusker JH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in PubMed DOI

Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH (2002) A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e23 PubMed PMC

Janke C, Magiera MM, Rathfelder N, Taxis C, Reber S, et al. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21: 947–962. 10.1002/yea.1142 PubMed DOI

Gietz RD, Woods RA (2002) Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/ polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol 350: 87–96. PubMed

Vachova L, Chernyavskiy O, Strachotova D, Bianchini P, Burdikova Z, et al. (2009) Architecture of developing multicellular yeast colony: spatio-temporal expression of Ato1p ammonium exporter. Environ Microbiol 11: 1866–1877. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01911.x PubMed DOI

Vachova L, Kucerova H, Devaux F, Ulehlova M, Palkova Z (2009) Metabolic diversification of cells during the development of yeast colonies. Environ Microbiol 11: 494–504. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01789.x PubMed DOI

Wessel D, Flugge UI (1984) A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal Biochem 138: 141–143. PubMed

Masuda T, Tomita M, Ishihama Y (2008) Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis. J Proteome Res 7: 731–740. 10.1021/pr700658q PubMed DOI

Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, et al. (2014) Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13: 2513–2526. 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591 PubMed DOI PMC

Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, et al. (2016) The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13: 731–740. 10.1038/nmeth.3901 PubMed DOI

Bester MC, Pretorius IS, Bauer FF (2006) The regulation of PubMed DOI

Roberts RL, Fink GR (1994) Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in PubMed

Obornik M, Vancova M, Lai DH, Janouskovec J, Keeling PJ, et al. (2011) Morphology and ultrastructure of multiple life cycle stages of the photosynthetic relative of apicomplexa, PubMed DOI

Palkova Z, Devaux F, Ricicova M, Minarikova L, Le Crom S, et al. (2002) Ammonia pulses and metabolic oscillations guide yeast colony development. Mol Biol Cell 13: 3901–3914. 10.1091/mbc.E01-12-0149 PubMed DOI PMC

Spatial structure of yeast biofilms and the role of cell adhesion across different media

Cell differentiation, aging, and death in spatially organized yeast communities: mechanisms and consequences

Spatially structured yeast communities: Understanding structure formation and regulation with omics tools

Removal of Manganese and Copper from Aqueous Solution by Yeast Papiliotrema huenov

Cell Distribution within Yeast Colonies and Colony Biofilms: How Structure Develops

Glucose, Cyc8p and Tup1p regulate biofilm formation and dispersal in wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Diverse roles of Tup1p and Cyc8p transcription regulators in the development of distinct types of yeast populations