BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The centromere drive theory explains diversity of eukaryotic centromeres as a consequence of the recurrent conflict between centromeric repeats and centromeric histone H3 (CenH3), in which selfish centromeres exploit meiotic asymmetry and CenH3 evolves adaptively to counterbalance deleterious consequences of driving centromeres. Accordingly, adaptively evolving CenH3 has so far been observed only in eukaryotes with asymmetric meiosis. However, if such evolution is a consequence of centromere drive, it should depend not only on meiotic asymmetry but also on monocentric or holokinetic chromosomal structure. Selective pressures acting on CenH3 have never been investigated in organisms with holokinetic meiosis despite the fact that holokinetic chromosomes have been hypothesized to suppress centromere drive. Therefore, the present study evaluates selective pressures acting on the CenH3 gene in holokinetic organisms for the first time, specifically in the representatives of the plant genus Luzula (Juncaceae), in which the kinetochore formation is not co-localized with any type of centromeric repeat. METHODS: PCR, cloning and sequencing, and database searches were used to obtain coding CenH3 sequences from Luzula species. Codon substitution models were employed to infer selective regimes acting on CenH3 in Luzula KEY RESULTS: In addition to the two previously published CenH3 sequences from L. nivea, 16 new CenH3 sequences have been isolated from 12 Luzula species. Two CenH3 isoforms in Luzula that originated by a duplication event prior to the divergence of analysed species were found. No signs of positive selection acting on CenH3 in Luzula were detected. Instead, evidence was found that selection on CenH3 of Luzula might have been relaxed. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that holokinetism itself may suppress centromere drive and, therefore, holokinetic chromosomes might have evolved as a defence against centromere drive.

Department of Botany and Zoology Masaryk University Kotlarska 2 611 37 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Anisimova M, Yang Z. 2007. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1219–1228. PubMed

Baker RE, Rogers K. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of fungal centromere H3 proteins. Genetics 174: 1481–1492. PubMed PMC

Beck EA, Llopart A. 2015. Widespread positive selection drives differentiation of centromeric proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Scientific Reports 5: 17197. PubMed PMC

Bureš P, Zedek F. 2014. Holokinetic drive: centromere drive in chromosomes without centromeres. Evolution 68: 2412–2420. PubMed

Bureš P, Zedek F, Marková M. 2013. Holocentric chromosomes In: Leitch IJ, Greihuber J, Doležel J, Wendel J, eds. Plant genome diversity, Vol. 2. Heidelberg: Springer, 187–208.

Chan RC, Severson AF, Meyer BJ. 2004. Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions. Journal of Cell Biology 167: 613–625. PubMed PMC

Drinnenberg IA, DeYoung D, Henikoff S, Malik HS. 2014. Recurrent loss of CenH3 is associated with independent transitions to holocentricity in insects. eLlife 3: e03676. PubMed PMC

Escudero M, Hipp AL, Waterway MJ, Valente LM. 2012. Diversification rates and chromosome evolution in the most diverse angiosperm genus of the temperate zone (Carex, Cyperaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 650–655. PubMed

Escudero M, Maguilla E, Loureiro J, Castro M, Castro S, Luceño M. 2015. Genome size stability despite high chromosome number variation in Carex gr. laevigata. American Journal of Botany 102: 233–238. PubMed

Fishman L. 2013. Female meiotic drive in monkeyflowers: insight into the population genetics of selfish centromeres In: Jiang J, Birchler JA, eds. Plant centromere biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 129–145.

Fishman L, Saunders A. 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322: 1559–1562. PubMed

Finseth FR, Dong Y, Saunders A, Fishman L. 2015. Duplication and adaptive evolution of a key centromeric protein in Mimulus, a genus with female meiotic drive. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 2694–2706. PubMed

Heckmann S, Macas J, Kumke K, et al. 2013. The holocentric species Luzula elegans shows interplay between centromere and large-scale genome organization. The Plant Journal 73: 555–565. PubMed

Heckmann S, Jankowska M, Schubert V, Kumke K, Ma W, Houben A. 2014. Alternative meiotic chromatid segregation in the holocentric plant Luzula elegans. Nature Communications 5: 4979. PubMed PMC

Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS. 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293: 1098–1102. PubMed

Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T. 2011. Organisation of the plant genome in chromosomes. The Plant Journal 66: 18–33. PubMed

Hirsch CD, Wu Y, Yan H, Jiang J. 2009. Lineage-specific adaptive evolution of the centromeric protein CENH3 in diploid and allotetraploid Oryza species. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 2877–2885. PubMed

Kikudome GY. 1959. Studies on the phenomenon of preferential segregation in maize. Genetics 44: 815–831. PubMed PMC

Kosakovsky Pond SL, Murrel B, Fourment M, Frost SD, Delport W, Scheffler K. 2011. A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 3033–3043. PubMed PMC

Lermontova I, Schubert I. 2013. CENH3 for establishing and maintaining centromeres In: Jiang J, Birchler JA. eds. Plant centromere biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 67–82.

Malik HS, Henikoff S. 2009. Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 138: 1067–1082. PubMed

Marques A, Ribeiro T, Neumann P, et al. 2015. Holocentromeres in Rhynchospora are associated with genome-wide centromere-specific repeat arrays interspersed among euchromatin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 112: 13633–13638. PubMed PMC

Melters DP, Paliulis LV, Korf IF, Chan SWL. 2012. Holocentric chromosomes: convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis. Chromosome Research 20: 579–593. PubMed

Melters DP, Bradnam KR, Young HA, et al. 2013. Comparative analysis of tandem repeats from hundreds of species reveals unique insights into centromere evolution. Genome Biology 14: R10. PubMed PMC

Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, et al. 2014. Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science 346: 763–767. PubMed

Monen J, Maddox PS, Hyndman F, Oegema K, Desai A. 2005. Differential role of CENP-A in the segregation of holocentric C. elegans chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis. Nature Cell Biology 7: 1248–1255. PubMed

Moraes IC, Lermontova I, Schubert I. 2011. Recognition of A. thaliana centromeres by heterologous CENH3 requires high similarity to the endogenous protein. Plant Molecular Biology 75: 253–261. PubMed

Murrell B, Wertheim JO, Moola S, Weighill T, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2012. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002764. PubMed PMC

Nagaki K, Kashihara K, Murata M. 2005. Visualization of diffuse centromeres with centromere-specific histone H3 in the holocentric plant Luzula nivea. The Plant Cell 17: 1886–1893. PubMed PMC

Neumann P, Navrátilová A, Schroeder-Reiter E, et al. 2012. Stretching the rules: monocentric chromosomes with multiple centromere domains. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002777. PubMed PMC

Redelings BD. 2014. Erasing errors due to alignment ambiguity when estimating positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31: 1979–1993. PubMed PMC

Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 54: 401–418. PubMed

Schueler MG, Swanson W, Thomas PJ, Green ED, Progra NCS. 2010. Adaptive evolution of foundation kinetochore proteins in primates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 1585–1597. PubMed PMC

Talbert PB, Bryson TD, Henikoff S. 2004. Adaptive evolution of centromere proteins in plants and animals. Journal of Biology 3: 18. PubMed PMC

Talbert PB, Bayes JJ, Henikoff S. 2008. Evolution of centromeres and kinetochores: a two-part fugue In: De Wulf P, Earnshaw WC, eds. The kinetochore: from molecular discoveries to cancer therapy. Berlin: Springer, 193–230.

Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586–1591. PubMed

Záveská Drábková L, Vlček C. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Luzula DC. (Juncaceae, Monocotyledones) based on plastome and nuclear ribosomal regions: a case of incongruence, incomplete lineage sorting and hybridisation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 536–551. PubMed

Zedek F, Bureš P. 2012. Evidence for centromere drive in the holocentric chromosomes of Caenorhabditis. PLoS One 7: e30496. PubMed PMC

Zedek F, Bureš P. 2016. CenH3 evolution reflects meiotic symmetry as predicted by the centromere drive model. Scientific Reports 6: 33308. PubMed PMC

Zedek F, Veselý P, Horová L, Bureš P. 2016. Flow cytometry may allow microscope-independent detection of holocentric chromosomes in plants. Scientific Reports 6: 27161. PubMed PMC

Zhang T, Talbert PB, Zhang W, et al. 2013. The CentO satellite confers translational and rotational phasing on cenH3 nucleosomes in rice centromeres. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110: E4875–4883. PubMed PMC

Centromere drive may propel the evolution of chromosome and genome size in plants

Holocentric Chromosomes Probably Do Not Prevent Centromere Drive in Cyperaceae

Endopolyploidy is a common response to UV-B stress in natural plant populations, but its magnitude may be affected by chromosome type

Chromosome numbers of Carex (Cyperaceae) and their taxonomic implications

Holocentric chromosomes: from tolerance to fragmentation to colonization of the land

Evolution of genome size and genomic GC content in carnivorous holokinetics (Droseraceae)

CenH3 evolution reflects meiotic symmetry as predicted by the centromere drive model