Plant biostimulants which include bioactive substances (humic acids, protein hydrolysates and seaweed extracts) and microorganisms (mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria of strains belonging to the genera Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Rhizobium spp.) are gaining prominence in agricultural systems because of their potential for improving nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stressors, and crop quality. Highly accurate non-destructive phenotyping techniques have attracted the interest of scientists and the biostimulant industry as an efficient means for elucidating the mode of biostimulant activity. High-throughput phenotyping technologies successfully employed in plant breeding and precision agriculture, could prove extremely useful in unraveling biostimulant-mediated modulation of key quantitative traits and would also facilitate the screening process for development of effective biostimulant products in controlled environments and field conditions. This perspective article provides an innovative discussion on how small, medium, and large high-throughput phenotyping platforms can accelerate efforts for screening numerous biostimulants and understanding their mode of action thanks to pioneering sensor and image-based phenotyping techniques. Potentiality and constraints of small-, medium-, and large-scale screening platforms are also discussed. Finally, the perspective addresses two screening approaches, "lab to field" and "field to lab," used, respectively, by small/medium and large companies for developing novel and effective second generation biostimulant products.

AgroBioChem s r o Bystročice Czechia

Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences University of Tuscia Viterbo Italy

Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Naples Federico 2 Portici Italy

Department of Chemical Biology and Genetics Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research Faculty of Science Palacký University Olomouc Czechia

Photon Systems Instruments spol s r o Drasov Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Araus J. L., Cairns J. E. (2014). Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. PubMed DOI

Bonini P., Long D. H., Canaguier R., Colla G., Leman J. (2017).

Calvo P., Nelson L., Kloepper J. W. (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. DOI

Casa R., Castaldi F., Pascucci S., Basso B., Pignatti S. (2013). Geophysical and hyperspectral data fusion techniques for in-field estimation of soil properties. DOI

Colla G., Rouphael Y. (2015). Biostimulants in horticulture. DOI

Colla G., Rouphael Y., Bonini P., Cardarelli M. (2015). Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, uptake nutrient, yield and grain quality of winter wheat.

De Diego N., Fürst T., Humplík J. F., Ugena L., Podlešáková K., Spíchal L. (2017). An automated method for high-throughput screening of Arabidopsis rosette growth in multi-well plates and Its validation in stress conditions. PubMed DOI PMC

Deery D., Jimenez-Berni J., Jones H., Sirault X., Furbank R. (2014). Proximal remote sensing buggies and potential applications for field-based phenotyping. DOI

du Jardin P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: definition, concept, main categories and regulation. DOI

Enciso J., Maeda M., Landivar J., Jung J., Chang A. (2017). A ground based platform for high throughput phenotyping. DOI

Ertani A., Pizzeghello D., Francioso O., Sambo P., Sanchez-Cortes S., Nardi S. (2014). PubMed DOI PMC

Ertani A., Schiavon M., Muscolo A., Nardi S. (2013). Alfalfa plant-derived biostimulant stimulate short-term growth of salt stressed Zea mays L. plants.

Friedli M., Kirchgessner N., Grieder C., Liebisch F., Mannale M., Walter A. (2016). Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions. PubMed DOI PMC

Halder V., Kombrink E. (2015). Facile high-throughput forward chemical genetic screening by in situ monitoring of glucuronidase-based reporter gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. PubMed DOI PMC

Humplík J. F., Lazár D., Husičková A., Spíchal L. (2015). Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses – a review. PubMed DOI PMC

Jones H. G., Hutchinson P. A., May T., Jamali H., Deery D. M. (2018). A practical method using a network of fixed infrared sensors for estimating crop canopy conductance and evaporation rate. DOI

Kirchgessner N., Liebisch F., Yu K., Pfeifer J., Friedli M., Hund A., et al. (2017). The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: a cable-suspended multi-sensor system. PubMed

Kjaer K. H., Ottosen C. O. (2015). 3D laser triangulation for plant phenotyping in challenging environments. PubMed DOI PMC

Lucini L., Rouphael Y., Cardarelli M., Bonini P., Baffi C., Colla G. (2018). A vegetal biopolymer-based biostimulant promoted root growth in melon while triggering brassinosteroids and stress-related compounds. PubMed DOI PMC

Lucini L., Rouphael Y., Cardarelli M., Canaguier R., Kumar P., Colla G. (2015). The effect of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. DOI

Madec S., Baret F., De Solan B., Thomas S., Dutartre D., Jezequel S., et al. (2017). High-throughput phenotyping of plant height: comparing unmanned aerial vehicles and ground lidar estimates. PubMed DOI PMC

Mishra K. B., Mishra A., Klem K., Govindjee (2016). Plant phenotyping: a perspective. DOI

Mishra P., Asaari M. S. M., Herrero-Langreo A., Lohumi S., Diezma B., Scheunders P. (2017). Close range hyperspectral imaging of plants: a review. DOI

Naito H., Ogawa S., Valencia M. O., Mohri H., Urano Y., Hosoi F., et al. (2017). Estimating rice yield related traits and quantitative trait loci analysis under different nitrogen treatments using a simple tower-based field phenotyping system with modified single-lens reflex cameras. DOI

Paez-Garcia A., Motes C. M., Scheible W. R., Chen R., Blancaflor E. B., Monteros M. J. (2015). Root traits and phenotyping strategies for plant improvement. PubMed DOI PMC

Pauli D., Chapman S. C., Bart R., Topp C. N., Lawrence-Dill C. J., Poland J., et al. (2016). The quest for understanding phenotypic variation via integrated approaches in the field environment. PubMed DOI PMC

Petrozza A., Santaniello A., Summerer S., Di Tommaso G., Di Tommaso D., Paparelli E., et al. (2014). Physiological responses to Megafol treatments in tomato plants under drought stress: a phenomic and molecular approach. DOI

Rahaman M. M., Chen D., Gillani Z., Klukas C., Chen M. (2015). Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development. PubMed DOI PMC

Rodriguez-Furlán C., Miranda G., Reggiardo M., Hicks G. R., Norambuena L. (2016). High throughput selection of novel plant growth regulators: assessing the translatability of small bioactive molecules from Arabidopsis to crops. PubMed DOI

Rouphael Y., Colla G., Giordano M., El-Nakhel C., Kyriacou M. C., De Pascale S. (2017). Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. DOI

Salas Fernandez M. G., Bao Y., Tang L., Schnable P. S. (2017). A high-throughput, field-based phenotyping technology for tall biomass crops. PubMed DOI PMC

Sankaran S., Khot L. R., Espinoza C. Z., Jarolmasjed S., Sathuvalli V. R., Vandemark G. J., et al. (2015). Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: a review. DOI

Shakoor N., Lee S., Mockler T. C. (2017). High throughput phenotyping to accelerate crop breeding and monitoring of diseases in the field. PubMed DOI

Tardieu F., Cabrera-Bosquet L., Pridmore T., Bennett M. (2017). Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. PubMed DOI

Virlet N., Sabermanesh K., Sadeghi-Tehran P., Hawkesford M. J. (2017). Field scanalyzer: an automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. PubMed DOI

Williams D., Britten A., McCallum S., Jones H. G., Aitkenhead M., Karley A., et al. (2017). A method for automatic segmentation and splitting of hyperspectral images of raspberry plants collected in field conditions. PubMed DOI PMC

Yang G., Liu J., Zhao C., Li Z., Huang Y., Yu H., et al. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field-based crop phenotyping: current status and perspectives. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang X., Schmidt R. E. (1997). The impact of growth regulators on alpha-tocopherol status of water-stressed

Presence and future of plant phenotyping approaches in biostimulant research and development

Functional phenomics for improved climate resilience in Nordic agriculture

Deciphering the Potential Role of Symbiotic Plant Microbiome and Amino Acid Application on Growth Performance of Chickpea Under Field Conditions

Seed Priming With Protein Hydrolysates Improves Arabidopsis Growth and Stress Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses

Integration of Phenomics and Metabolomics Datasets Reveals Different Mode of Action of Biostimulants Based on Protein Hydrolysates in Lactuca sativa L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. Under Salinity

Hormopriming to Mitigate Abiotic Stress Effects: A Case Study of N 9-Substituted Cytokinin Derivatives With a Fluorinated Carbohydrate Moiety

A Combined Phenotypic and Metabolomic Approach for Elucidating the Biostimulant Action of a Plant-Derived Protein Hydrolysate on Tomato Grown Under Limited Water Availability

Understanding the Biostimulant Action of Vegetal-Derived Protein Hydrolysates by High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping and Metabolomics: A Case Study on Tomato