Integration of Phenomics and Metabolomics Datasets Reveals Different Mode of Action of Biostimulants Based on Protein Hydrolysates in Lactuca sativa L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. Under Salinity

. 2021 ; 12 () : 808711. [epub] 20220203

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid35185959

Plant phenomics is becoming a common tool employed to characterize the mode of action of biostimulants. A combination of this technique with other omics such as metabolomics can offer a deeper understanding of a biostimulant effect in planta. However, the most challenging part then is the data analysis and the interpretation of the omics datasets. In this work, we present an example of how different tools, based on multivariate statistical analysis, can help to simplify the omics data and extract the relevant information. We demonstrate this by studying the effect of protein hydrolysate (PH)-based biostimulants derived from different natural sources in lettuce and tomato plants grown in controlled conditions and under salinity. The biostimulants induced different phenotypic and metabolomic responses in both crops. In general, they improved growth and photosynthesis performance under control and salt stress conditions, with better performance in lettuce. To identify the most significant traits for each treatment, a random forest classifier was used. Using this approach, we found out that, in lettuce, biomass-related parameters were the most relevant traits to evaluate the biostimulant mode of action, with a better response mainly connected to plant hormone regulation. However, in tomatoes, the relevant traits were related to chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in combination with certain antistress metabolites that benefit the electron transport chain, such as 4-hydroxycoumarin and vitamin K1 (phylloquinone). Altogether, we show that to go further in the understanding of the use of biostimulants as plant growth promotors and/or stress alleviators, it is highly beneficial to integrate more advanced statistical tools to deal with the huge datasets obtained from the -omics to extract the relevant information.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aggarwal C. C., Hinneburg A., Keim D. A. (2001). “On the Surprising Behavior of Distance Metrics in High Dimensional Space,” in DOI

Akhtar S. S., Amby D. B., Hegelund J. N., Fimognari L., Großkinsky D. K., Westergaard J. C., et al. (2020). PubMed DOI PMC

Ali M., Kamran M., Abbasi G. H., Saleem M. H., Ahmad S., Parveen A., et al. (2021). Melatonin-induced salinity tolerance by ameliorating osmotic and oxidative stress in the seedlings of two tomato ( DOI

Awlia M., Nigro A., Fajkus J., Schmoeckel S. M., Negrão S., Santelia D., et al. (2016). High-throughput non-destructive phenotyping of traits that contribute to salinity tolerance in PubMed DOI PMC

Bady P., Dolédec S., Dumont B., Fruget J.-F. (2004). Multiple co-inertia analysis: a tool for assessing synchrony in the temporal variability of aquatic communities. PubMed DOI

Barradas A., Correia P. M. P., Silva S., Mariano P., Pires M. C., Matos A. R., et al. (2021). Comparing machine learning methods for classifying plant drought stress from leaf reflectance spectra in DOI

Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. DOI

Billakurthi K., Schreier T. B. (2020). Insights into the control of metabolism and biomass accumulation in a staple C4 grass. PubMed DOI PMC

Boisgontier M. P., Cheval B. (2016). The anova to mixed model transition. PubMed DOI

Briglia N., Petrozza A., Hoeberichts F. A., Verhoef N., Povero G. (2019). Investigating the impact of biostimulants on the row crops corn and soybean using high-efficiency phenotyping and next generation sequencing. DOI

Cano-Ramirez D. L., Dodd A. N. (2018). New connections between circadian rhythms, photosynthesis, and environmental adaptation. PubMed DOI

Caspi R., Dreher K., Karp P. D. (2013). The challenge of constructing, classifying, and representing metabolic pathways. PubMed DOI PMC

Ceccarelli A. V., Miras-Moreno B., Buffagni V., Senizza B., Pii Y., Cardarelli M., et al. (2021). Foliar application of different vegetal-derived protein hydrolysates distinctively modulates tomato root development and metabolism. PubMed DOI PMC

Colla G., Rouphael Y. (2015). Biostimulants in horticulture. DOI

Corwin D. L. (2020). Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. DOI

Danzi D., Briglia N., Petrozza A., Summerer S., Povero G., Stivaletta A., et al. (2019). Can high throughput phenotyping help food security in the Mediterranean area?. PubMed DOI PMC

De Diego N., Perez-Alfocea F., Cantero E., Lacuesta M., Moncalean P. (2012). Physiological response to drought in radiata pine: phytohormone implication at leaf level. PubMed DOI

Dell’Aversana E., D’Amelia L., De Pascale S., Carillo P. (2020). “Use of biostimulants to improve salinity tolerance in agronomic crops,” in DOI

Devarajan A. K., Muthukrishanan G., Truu J., Truu M., Ostonen I., Kizhaeral S., et al. (2021). The foliar application of rice phyllosphere bacteria induces drought-stress tolerance in PubMed DOI PMC

Di Mola I., Conti S., Cozzolino E., Melchionna G., Ottaiano L., Testa A., et al. (2021). Plant-based protein hydrolysate improves salinity tolerance in hemp: agronomical and physiological aspects. DOI

Di Mola I., Cozzolino E., Ottaiano L., Giordano M., Rouphael Y., Colla G., et al. (2019a). Effect of vegetal- and seaweed extract-based biostimulants on agronomical and leaf quality traits of plastic tunnel-grown baby lettuce under four regimes of nitrogen fertilization. DOI

Di Mola I., Ottaiano L., Cozzolino E., Senatore M., Giordano M., El-Nakhel C., et al. (2019b). Plant-based biostimulants influence the agronomical, physiological, and qualitative responses of baby rocket leaves under diverse nitrogen conditions. PubMed DOI PMC

Freitas W. E., de S., Oliveira A. B., de Mesquita R. O., de Carvalho H. H., et al. (2019). Sulfur-induced salinity tolerance in lettuce is due to a better P and K uptake, lower Na/K ratio and an efficient antioxidative defense system. DOI

Genitsaris S., Monchy S., Breton E., Lecuyer E., Christaki U. (2016). Small-scale variability of protistan planktonic communities relative to environmental pressures and biotic interactions at two adjacent coastal stations. DOI

Halford N. G., Shewry P. R. (2000). Genetically modified crops: methodology, benefits, regulation and public concerns. PubMed DOI

Henley W. J. (1993). Measurement and interpretation of photosynthetic light- response curves in algae in the context of photoinhibition and diel changes.

Hou M., Tian F., Zhang T., Huang M. (2019). Evaluation of canopy temperature depression, transpiration, and canopy greenness in relation to yield of soybean at reproductive stage based on remote sensing imagery. DOI

Junker A., Muraya M. M., Weigelt-Fischer K., Arana-Ceballos F., Klukas C., Melchinger A. E., et al. (2015). Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems. PubMed DOI PMC

Lisiecka J., Knaflewski M., Spiżewski T., Frąszczak B., Kałużewicz A., Krzesinski W. (2011). The effect of animal protein hydrolysate on quantity and quality of strawberry daughter plants cv. ‘Elsanta’. DOI

Ludwig-Müller J. (2011). Auxin conjugates: their role for plant development and in the evolution of land plants. PubMed DOI

Lüthje S., Möller B., Perrineau F. C., Wöltje K. (2013). Plasma membrane electron pathways and oxidative stress. PubMed DOI

McCulloch C. E., Searle S. R. (2000). “Generalized, linear, and mixed models,” in DOI

Mellor N., Band L. R., Pìnèík A., Novák O., Rashed A., Holman T. (2016). Dynamic regulation of auxin oxidase and conjugating enzymes AtDAO1 and GH3 modulates auxin homeostasis. PubMed DOI PMC

Meza S. L. R., Egea I., Massaretto I. L., Morales B., Purgatto E., Egea-Fernández J. M., et al. (2020). Traditional tomato varieties improve fruit quality without affecting fruit yield under moderate salt stress. PubMed DOI PMC

Mimmo T., Tiziani R., Valentinuzzi F., Lucini L., Nicoletto C., Sambo P., et al. (2017). Selenium biofortification in PubMed DOI PMC

Miras-Moreno B., Zhang L., Senizza B., Lucini L. (2021). A metabolomics insight into the Cyclic Nucleotide Monophosphate signaling cascade in tomato under non-stress and salinity conditions. PubMed DOI

Moncada A., Vetrano F., Miceli A. (2020). Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth-promoting bacteria in hydroponic leaf lettuce. DOI

Mukhopadhyay R., Sarkar B., Jat H. S., Sharma P. C., Bolan N. S. (2021). Soil salinity under climate change: challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. PubMed DOI

Munns R., James R. A. (2000). Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. DOI

Munns R., Tester M. (2008). Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. PubMed DOI

Mutale-joan C., Redouane B., Najib E., Yassine K., Lyamlouli K., Sbabou L., et al. (2020). Screening of microalgae liquid extracts for their biostimulant properties on plant growth, nutrient uptake and metabolite profile of PubMed DOI PMC

Paul K., Sorrentino M., Lucini L., Rouphael Y., Cardarelli M., Bonini P., et al. (2019a). A combined phenotypic and metabolomic approach for elucidating the biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate on tomato grown under limited water availability. PubMed DOI PMC

Paul K., Sorrentino M., Lucini L., Rouphael Y., Cardarelli M., Bonini P., et al. (2019b). Understanding the biostimulant action of vegetal-derived protein hydrolysates by high-throughput plant phenotyping and metabolomics: a case study on tomato. PubMed DOI PMC

Pretali L., Bernardo L., Butterfield T. S., Trevisan M., Lucini L. (2016). Botanical and biological pesticides elicit a similar Induced Systemic Response in tomato ( PubMed DOI

Qi Y. (2012). “Random forest for bioinformatics,” in

R Core Team (2014).

Rahaman M. M., Ahsan M. A., Gillani Z., Chen M. (2017). Digital biomass accumulation using high-throughput plant phenotype data analysis. PubMed DOI PMC

Rascher U., Liebig M., Lüttge U. (2000). Evaluation of instant light-response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field.

Robert P., Escoufier Y. (1976). A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV- coefficient. DOI

Rouphael Y., Spíchal L., Panzarová K., Casa R., Colla G. (2018). High-throughput plant phenotyping for developing novel biostimulants: from lab to field or from field to lab?. PubMed DOI PMC

Russell L. (2020).

Salek R. M., Neumann S., Schober D., Hummel J., Billiau K., Kopka J., et al. (2015). COordination of Standards in MetabOlomicS (COSMOS): facilitating integrated metabolomics data access. PubMed DOI PMC

Saxena A., Prasad M., Gupta A., Bharill N., Patel O. P., Tiwari A., et al. (2017). A review of clustering techniques and developments. DOI

Schläpfer P., Zhang P., Wang C., Kim T., Banf M., Chae L., et al. (2017). Genome-wide prediction of metabolic enzymes, pathways, and gene clusters in plants. PubMed DOI PMC

Singh A., Ganapathysubramanian B., Singh A. K., Sarkar S. (2016). Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. PubMed DOI

Sorrentino M., De Diego N., Ugena L., Spíchal L., Lucini L., Miras-Moreno B., et al. (2021). Seed priming with protein hydrolysates improves arabidopsis growth and stress tolerance to abiotic stresses. PubMed DOI PMC

Tsugawa H., Cajka T., Kind T., Ma Y., Higgins B., Ikeda K., et al. (2015). MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. PubMed DOI PMC

Tsugawa H., Kind T., Nakabayashi R., Yukihira D., Tanaka W., Cajka T., et al. (2016). Hydrogen Rearrangement Rules: computational MS/MS Fragmentation and Structure Elucidation Using MS-FINDER Software. PubMed DOI PMC

Ugena L., Hılová A., Podlešáková K., Humplík J. F., Doležal K., De Diego N., et al. (2018). Characterization of biostimulant mode of action using novel Multi-Trait High-Throughput Screening of Arabidopsis germination and rosette growth. PubMed DOI PMC

Van Oosten M. J., Pepe O., De Pascale S., Silletti S., Maggio A. (2017). The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. DOI

Vanderstraeten L., Depaepe T., Bertrand S., Van Der Straeten D. (2019). The ethylene precursor ACC affects early vegetative development independently of ethylene signaling. PubMed DOI PMC

Veselov D., Mustafina A., Sabirjanova I., Akhiyarova G. R., Dedov A. V., Veselov S. U., et al. (2002). Effect of PEG-treatment on the leaf growth response and auxin content in shoots of wheat seedlings. DOI

Yamaguchi T., Blumwald E. (2005). Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: challenges and opportunities. PubMed DOI

Yang L., Wu L., Yao X., Zhao S., Wang J., Li S., et al. (2018). Hydroxycoumarins: new, effective plant-derived compounds reduce PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...